Search Results

1. AQ v ZI LCRO 105 / 2010 (11 February 2011) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...and March 2009. [7] On 2 April 2009, the Applicant made his concerns about these inconsistencies known to the Respondent, and also requested an indication of all possible costs from that point onwards. [8] On 3 May 2009, he sent a follow-up email requesting a response to his request. [9] Having received no response to either of these emails, he then sent an email to ZH on 19 May 2009 in which he requested a response to his emails, and withdrew his credit card authorisation for p...

2. Yiasoumi v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...following day so that the CIB could conduct the inquiry. Technical constraints affected the instant transfer of the photographs held on the iPhone to the investigation file which existed in hard copy only. This was because Constable Upton had to email the photographs to himself and there was a maximum of about four which could be sent at any one time. In addition there was often a delay between transmission of the emails and their receipt. He believes the two hospital photographs had n...

3. [2024] NZREADT 18 - HH v CAC 2201 & SL (19 June 2024) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...to bid another $1,000. The purchaser’s winning bid was therefore $1,200,000. [12] It was not until 16 March 2022, according to the purchaser, that he found out from Mr P that he had not bid $1,199,000. [13] There followed an exchange of emails between the purchaser and the licensee, as the former sought the bidding history (including identification of the bidders). The purchaser made a complaint to the agency’s manager on 30 March 2022. In an email on 1 April 2022 (at 1...

4. Form-3-Deportation-Appeal-by-Resident.pdf [pdf, 462 KB]

   ...Separated  Widowed  Civil Union  Partnership / De facto  Divorced  Other (specify) ____________ Step 2. Your contact details What is your current residential address? (this cannot be a PO Box) Address: Telephone: Email: What country were you born in? Deportation Appeal by a Resident or Permanent Resident IMMIGRATION AND PROTECTION TRIBUNAL | RŌPŪ TAKE MANENE, TAKE WHAKAMARU Appeal No………………………….....

5. G Ltd v D Ltd [2025] NZDT 222 (9 June 2025) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...the guaranteed weekly income of $2,800.00 meant that G Ltd should have been paid $16,800.00, a shortfall of over $12,000.00. 5. KT said that D Ltd were using clause 7 in a way that was contrary to how KN had told him how it worked. He provided emails he sent to D Ltd that expressed his frustrations with what he had been told about the guaranteed income and how he had invested all his savings to buy the franchise in reliance on the promise KN had made that he would be paid a minimum we...

6. [2009] NZEmpC AC 30/09 Masonry Design Solutions Ltd v Bettany [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...on a number of the company’s projects consistent with his skill in, and experience of, the CAD program. Mr Bettany operated a computer used by him exclusively that both remained switched on constantly and had access to the internet including email services at all times. [9] Towards the end of the three-month term of his employment, MDSL became concerned about Mr Bettany’s time keeping and work output. On a number of occasions over the past 2½ months and without explanation o...

7. MSC v Scholes [2013] NZIACDT 71 (25 November 2013) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...that the course was too elementary for the complainant’s skill level, and insufficient to qualifying for nursing. [16] It is necessary to address this issue, and any significance it has in relation to determining the sanctions to be imposed. Email of 2 May 2011 [17] A disputed fact in the complaint concerned when Ms Scholes ascertained that the complainant had already passed an IELTS test at level 7.5, which was more than sufficient to meet the English language requirements for nurs...

8. LCRO 382/2013 SC v JT (30 June 2017) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...Mr SC as to why he was unable to release files and funds immediately. (a) Mr SC had threatened him with a complaint in contravention of the principle expressed in UF v OU.2 [10] In responding to the complaint, Mr SC submitted that: (a) His email did not constitute an improper threat, but rather was intended to provide opportunity to Mr JT to comply with a proper request. (b) The matter was distinguishable from that in UF v OU, in that case the alleged breach having already occur...

9. Legal-Aid-lawyer-Provider-Manual-updated.pdf [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...are several different phone numbers and email addresses. Please direct your query to the relevant contact to help us respond as soon as possible. If you have a general question about legal aid, please phone 0800 2 LEGAL AID (0800 253 425). When emailing us, please make it as clear as possible what your email is about - use appropriate email subject headings and, where applicable, include the legal aid number (begins with LA xxxxxxxx). Queries about case allocations, specific cases or...

10. Legal-Aid-lawyer-Provider-Manual.pdf [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...are several different phone numbers and email addresses. Please direct your query to the relevant contact to help us respond as soon as possible. If you have a general question about legal aid, please phone 0800 2 LEGAL AID (0800 253 425). When emailing us, please make it as clear as possible what your email is about - use appropriate email subject headings and, where applicable, include the legal aid number (begins with LA xxxxxxxx). Queries about case allocations, specific cases...