Search Results

1. OD v MW & FW [2023] NZDT 398 (8 September 2023) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...against both respondents. Reasons 1. In May 2022 OD and his husband were gifted a $1000.00 voucher for [restaurant] in [suburb]. The voucher was to expire in May 2023. OD says they tried to book using the voucher but received no reply to their emails. He noted that [restaurant] did not take bookings by phone as a matter of policy and their online booking system did not accommodate gift vouchers because it required a non-refundable deposit to be paid. The restaurant closed in June 2...

2. [2019] NZREADT 43 - Troughton v Registrar of the Real Estate Agents Authority (10 Oct 2019) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...under s 58 of the Act. Pursuant to the Real Estate Agents Authority (Fees and Levies) Notice 2016, he was required to pay an annual fee to renew the voluntary suspension of his licence (“the annual suspension fee”). [3] On 18 May 2019, an email was sent to Mr Troughton from the Regulatory Services Administration Team of the Authority, advising him that he was required to pay the annual suspension fee by 29 June 2019. Mr Troughton was also advised that pursuant to s 54(h) of th...

3. Stenhouse v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) and Mackay [2018] NZREADT 55 [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...Committee was wrong to accept Mr Mackay’s statement that he had Mr Busse’s consent to consult Mr Steven, and was therefore free to do so, and to find that Mr Mackay’s consulting Mr Steven was “prudent”. [21] Ms Stenhouse referred to email correspondence involving herself, Mr Busse, Mr Mackay, Mr Steven and her personal solicitor, Ms Macdonald, between 25 and 27 March, in which the amendments to the apportionment and cash-out clauses were discussed. She submitted that th...

4. CAC 20003 v Weldrand [2013] NZREADT 78 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...misconduct under s.73(a) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, in that he engaged in conduct that would reasonably be regarded by agents of good standing, or reasonable members of the public, as disgraceful. Particulars: (a) The defendant sent an email to the complainant from an anonymous account using a fictitious identity stating that the sender would ask questions at a National Bank seminar at which the complainant would be speaking about the complainant’s qualifications and rates...

5. Maori Land Court Form 98L - Application for dispute resolution [pdf, 521 KB]

   .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. (Address to which documents or correspondence in connection with the application can be posted or delivered) Email address ..........................................................................................

6. [2014] NZEmpC 64 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board No 5 Interlocutory [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...defendant wrongfully refused to disclose other relevant documents on grounds of legal professional privilege. These documents and other communications are set out in a table at para 10 of Mr Scotland’s memorandum of 17 March 2014. They are all emails between Board members created between 8 October and 3 December 2009. [5] In relation to this series of emails for which privilege has been claimed by the defendant, Mr Webster advises the Court that two of these documents (numbered...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 27 Henderson v Nelson Marlborough DHB [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...statement of claim is filed by Paul Aiden McBride, whose address for [service] is at the offices of McBride Davenport James, Solicitors, 21-23 Blair Street, P.O. Box 19001, DX SP 21007, Wellington; Phone: 04 801 5427; Fax: 04 801 5428 and whose email address for service is paul@mdjlaw.co.nz [5] The evidence before the Court is that on 10 December 2015, the statement of claim in EMPC 364/2015 was sent by Mr McBride to Ms Sharma by email. The Court has no evidence as to whether a...

8. LCRO 28/2017 HK v TX (31 May 2019) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...second defendant, Mr YK, and was written in response to an email Mr YK had forwarded to the real estate agent involved in the transaction; (i) Mr TX accepts that it was indiscreet of him to mention his client in the email; 5 (j) the other emails complained of were forwarded long after the retainer had been terminated; (k) The emails were forwarded at a time when Ms HK and her husband were making extensive allegations against Mr TX in both the High Court proceedings, and in...

9. CM v XH LCRO 97 / 2010 (5 July 2011) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...property matters to be dealt with. All matters were eventually settled, making it unnecessary for any proceeding to be filed. Substantive complaints [11] There were two principal complaints made by the Applicant. The first concerned an email sent by the Practitioner to the Applicant, informing him of R‟s wish to separate and other related matters. This email was sent to the Applicant‟s email address at his work. The Applicant complained that the Practitioner ought to hav...

10. LCRO 22/2019 HT v MK (29 May 2020) [pdf, 326 KB]

    ...BEG’s shares in DOT. 1 The firm acted on matters including a claim against a former employee of DOT, Mr JS, referred to later in this decision. 2 [4] On 10 March 2016, Mr MK reminded (by email) Mr HT that DOT owed $39,538.74 to the firm for outstanding fees.2 Six weeks later on 28 April 2016, in response to Mr MK’s follow up email, Mr HT expressed (by email) his lack of “confidence” with the firm “over the outstandi...