Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 98 Narayan v Telecom NZ Ltd [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...leave for three weeks from 6 December until 27 December 2011. On this basis Mr Narayan was to return to work on 27 December 2011. Mr Narayan was intending to travel to Fiji for his annual leave. [14] On 27 December 2011, Mr Narayan sent an email to Telecom indicating that he was unwell and could not return to work on that day or the following day. That email was sent to Mr Ricky Henry, the Customer Care Manager for Telecom. Mr Narayan also sent a copy of the email to Mr James...

2. [2019] NZEmpC 67 Hokotehi Maori Trust v Prater [pdf, 379 KB]

   ...2017. [11] Mr Prater sent his statement of problem by email to the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) in Christchurch. That document and its attachments totalled some 214 pages. The volume was such that he sent it by means of four emails, just after 9.00 pm on 16 October 2017. He said he subsequently learned that the emails had been received by the Authority at 1.00 am on 17 October 2017. [12] The statement of problem asserted there was a “constructed dismissal wh...

3. LCRO 137/2023 FK v QT (10 June 2025) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...gave details of the respondent’s first avoidance or refusal to take or respond to his calls in November 2020. At that time, the respondent reminded the applicant of his associate’s advice of August 2020. [11] On 17 February 2021, the applicant emailed the associate with a settlement offer on the relationship property dispute. The associate replied the following day advising that the respondent would be handling the matter. 2 FK v QT & LM [2025] NZLCRO 023. 3 [12] On...

4. Peters v Wellington Combined Shuttles (Application by Defendant that Jurisdiction be Declined) [2013] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...[12.4] The jurisdiction objection is thereafter to be determined by the Tribunal following a hearing on the papers. The evidence filed by Mr Peters [19] On 1 November 2012 Mr Peters sent to the Tribunal and to the solicitors for the defendants an email in the following terms: Please find attached the following documents in response to the above case, HRRT017/2012, Presley John Peters v Wellington Combined Shuttles Limited and Wellington Combined Taxis Limited. 1. Response by the pla...

5. VK & VI v AC LCRO 268-269 / 2011 & 105 / 2012 (13 May 2013) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...September 2011 concerning the conduct of Mr AC. Mr AC and his partner, Mr AD, provided a response to those complaints by letter dated 19 September 2011. That letter was sent to Mr VK. [2] On 26 September, Mr VK copied to the Complaints Service an email that he had sent to Mr VI, with which he had sent the response from Messrs AC and AD. He sent that letter to Mr VI as he considered that Mr VI and his wife should be given the opportunity to review the content of the letter. [3]...

6. Cavanagh v Nassiep [2012] NZIACDT 38 (31 July 2012) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...application. The letter also had handwritten notes saying points had not been awarded for Mr Cavanagh being a diesel mechanic, and he should appeal. However, Ms Nassiep could not assist as she was not in New Zealand. [20.5] Ms Nassiep sent an email to Immigration New Zealand dated 24 November 2010. It referred to Mr Cavanagh’s qualifications, and said she was leaving New Zealand two days later. It suggested Immigration New Zealand should liaise with Mr Cavanagh after that. [20...

7. 2023-05-22-Form-33-Prouse-Trust-K-S-Prouse.pdf [pdf, 429 KB]

   ...alternative dispute resolution of the proceedings. For ourselves and on behalf of the Prouse Trust Partnership Jlf /o.s/ 2023 Date Address for service of person wishing to be a party: karen.stephen@xtra.co.nz Telephone: 0272487676 or 06 3683832 Fax/email: karen.stephen@xtra.co.nz Contract person: Karen Prouse Otaki N Appendix Prouse Trust Partnerships / SJ KM Prouse Levi Highway Project Submission I':.. Greater ... .., ~~,.. .... '-• Wellington Ka~iti Co...

8. [2025] NZEmpC 39 Alexander v Thorn [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...suffer prejudice as a result of a new claim coming against him because the claim is not new. Analysis [12] The last day for filing a challenge was 16 May 2023. Mr Alexander purported to file a document in the Authority on that date by way of email. His email included Mr Thorn and Mr Alexander’s own representative as recipients. It is not clear what the document attached to that email was or how the Authority responded. I accept that his actions on that date show t...

9. Guide 1 - A guide to residence appeals [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...than 42 days from the date on which Immigration New Zealand notified you of its decision. You were notified of the decision: a) if it was sent by registered post or courier, when it was delivered to your contact address; or b) if it was sent by email, that same day. This is because the date of receipt is when it was delivered to the server of your internet service provider or other server used by you for the receipt of email. The only exception to this if there is evidence to indicate...

10. Guide-4-A-Guide-to-Deportation-Appeals-by-a-Non-Resident.pdf [pdf, 277 KB]

    ...New Zealand; or e) decline your appeal, but delay your deportation for up to 12 months, or order that a temporary visa for up to 12 months be granted, to enable you to get your affairs in order. After the Tribunal makes its decision, it posts or emails a copy to you, your lawyer or representative (if you have one) and to Immigration New Zealand. The estimated time for appeals to be determined is given on the Tribunal’s website. The Tribunal publishes its decisions on its website....