Search Results

1. UN Ltd v MI [2023] NZDT 205 (13 April 2023) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...scope, electrical work was not. 3. UN invoiced MI on 8th and 14th September 2022 and both those invoices were paid, totalling $11,267.88 incl GST. On 20 September, UN forwarded its final invoice for $19,518.48 incl GST, and after some back-and-forth email correspondence about the unexpected final amount, MI emailed UN on 4 November 2022 that she had paid $9402.55 in full and final payment against the final invoice. That means MI has paid a total of $20,670.43 to date. 4. UN claims $...

2. DB Ltd v UC [2024] NZDT 449 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...that arrangements depended on student numbers. He says that rooms were provisionally put into the booking system on the basis of the discussion. However, he says, this was not a formal booking and there was no contract at this time; b. DM then emailed the Motel on 29 November 2022. The email refers to a “booking”, it specifies the number of people, that there were 4 apartments and the price. It asks the Motel to send “the invoice.” On the ordinary meaning of these words, this i...

3. CD Ltd v BM [2024] NZDT 396 (10 June 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...additional work, over and above the original scope of work, is undertaken. The client must be advised of the variation, and given an opportunity to either accept or decline the variation. 10. BC claims he advised BM of the need for a variation in his email dated 27 February. The email states the variation was necessary as the dining room door was wider than he expected. BC did not give an estimate for the increased costs. 11. BM responded to the email by advising BC that the doo...

4. Q Ltd v SN & TT [2024] NZDT 628 (19 August 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...agree to the term quoted above. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 b. They made it clear to BS that they could only afford a “deposit” of 20%, and therefore they were only seeking loans of a minimum 80% LVR. 9. BS sent SN and TT an email on 19 April 2023. The email included an attachment with comprehensive disclosure information and terms and conditions. The email gave SN and TT information about how to register and set up their “profile” on Q Ltd’s website....

5. LCRO 95/2013 GI v JM (28 June 2017) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...formally notified Mr JM of that at the time, but on 20 December 2011, he asked Mr JM for a breakdown of his three invoices. Mr JM did not return to work after the Christmas break until 16 January 2012. On 25 January 2012, Mr GI told Mr JM in an email that he “no longer [had] authority to represent [Mr GI]” and he directed him to “cease all further work”. No invoices were issued by Mr JM after 9 December 2011, nor any work carried out, and so for the purposes of this decision I w...

6. E2 Fiona Knox Corporate Options Analysis and Engagement EIC Applicant [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...Centre and Waterfront regeneration programme; and to update progress following the meeting with Mayor Goff and Minister Parker (1 December 2017) and establish a forward engagement framework for the America’s Cup. N/A 22 December 2018 Email correspondence to Panuku Mana Whenua Governance Forum Proposed AC36 consultation plan sent out to all 19 mana whenua – including request to develop CVA N/A 22 December – January 2018 Phone correspondence to various...

7. KY v DZ LCRO 174/2015 (25 October 2016) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...care of the children proceedings in the Family Court from 2012, and relationship property issues that were awaiting final resolution when he was instructed in 2014. Mr DZ communicated with Ms JR over their clients’ matters, 2 including an email he sent on 28 March 2014 in which he proposed two options for progressing resolution of the property disputes: either Mr KY accept Mr DZ’s settlement proposal within 10 working days, or he would immediately thereafter file proceedings in...

8. LCRO 130/2016 RB v ZB (28 June 2017) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...the additional expense [he] incurred in litigating because of the missing file notes”. Mr TC’s file notes [18] Mr RB contends that Mr TC’s file notes existed up until sometime after Mr TC left Mr ZB’s firm. He does not accept that his email of 21 February 2011 prompted Ms TE, a lawyer who was employed by Mr ZB at the relevant time, to action the share transfer. [19] He claims that this is supported by: (a) Ms TE’s enquiry of Ms TB concerning the transfer of shares in...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 155 Best Health Foods Ltd v Berea [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...raises issues as to whether or not the Authority erred, it is necessary to set out its findings. [4] The Authority began by summarising the evidence as to how Ms Berea came to be employed by BHFL for a short period only. [5] After referring to email exchanges, the Authority found that on Monday, 13 January 2020, Ms Berea accepted an offer to work for BHFL as a Marketing, Sales and Production Coordinator.2 Although she indicated she would commence on Thursday, 16 January, it was...

10. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Collins [2022] NZLCDT 22 (30 June 2022) [pdf, 170 KB]

    ...understand the significance of a new EPOA being signed by her and found that she had such. Mrs W confirmed to the doctor that she was content living with her sisters who she found supportive. [17] Having received this report on 7 July, Mr Collins emailed K as executor of Mr W’s estate with a number of questions about probate and the administration of the estate. On the same day he received a response from Gawith Burridge, advising that they were acting in the administration of...