GL v JS LCRO 289/2013 (30 October 2014) [pdf, 56 KB]
...that the incident was unintentional and arose as a result of oversight by him. He denies that he was (or would ever be) a threat to the processes of the Court. Complaint [12] Having read about the incident, GL (who does not know JS) sent an email to the Lawyers Complaints Service (LCS) lodging “a formal complaint” and asserting that he was “obliged to report” the conduct under rule 2.8 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the...