Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 60 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...Noble has not responded to any requests for instructions on the application for costs. Second, they seek directions for substituted service of that application; this was stated to be necessary because whilst the firm held a telephone number and email address for Mr Noble, he had declined to provide a physical address in the United States of America (USA) where he resides. [3] The third application is brought by BCL against GRL and/or counsel, that they be joined as parties for c...

2. [2020] NZEmpC 165 Culturesafe NZ Ltd v Turuki Healthcare Services Charitable Trust [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...Winiata and Ms Ratcliff. The letter included commentary on the mediation, details from the Record of Settlement, and comments that were critical of Turuki. It erroneously said that Mr Halse had contacted Turuki “both verbally and in a follow up email” advising them they were in breach of the legislation and requesting immediate payment. The letter made other unsubstantiated statements and made references to Turuki being tax payer/government funded. [20] The letter to Mini...

3. FT Ltd v D Ltd [2020] NZDT 1418 (27 November 2020) [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...minimal input. Instead, D Ltd says that at the time it entered the Agreement and during the implementation of the payroll module, FT Ltd’s pre-set templates were not configured for certain NZ specific payroll requirements. 31. The following email correspondence was provided to support D Ltd’s submission: Response from FT Ltd to D LTD on 6 May 2019, “For the issues specific to NZ payroll, Frank will be addressing these…” D LTD email to FT Ltd 15 May 2019, “…Consider...

4. [2021] NZACC 26 - Haugh v ACC (4 February 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...his weekly compensation had been set up based on his 2014 tax return. • Regular weekly compensation payments of $1,077.17 gross continued from 2 March 2015 to 6 April 2016, which were not abated. • On 17 March 2015, after an exchange of emails between Mr Haugh and the Corporation, he was provided with an ACC206 form for him to complete on a weekly basis relative to the hours of work completed by him. • Mr Haugh acknowledged his understanding of what was required in ter...

5. LCRO 106/2022 MG v WL (30 June 2023) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...They consider that the essence of Ms MG’s application was that her right to natural justice had been breached because:15 a) She was not properly served with correspondence from the Complaints Service because the correspondence was sent to her email address and not her “service address” which is her home address. b) The correspondence sent to her email address could not be opened with the passwords supplied by the Complaints Service. c) The Complaints Service did not accept the...

6. [2025] NZEmpC 34  Xu v Pioneer Education and Immigration Services Group Ltd [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...offer had it been made – he had no problem with performing education consultancy work, which was the basis on which his visa was initially granted. 9 At [30]–[31]. 10 At [41]. [36] The best evidence of what occurred is the emails that were exchanged between Mr Xu and Mr Zhu at the time. [37] In an email sent to Mr Xu on 7 January 2020, Mr Zhu stated: “As explained today, I think I am not capable to fully supervise your practical process from now on, due t...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Woodroffe [2025] NZLCDT 1 (7 January 2025) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...this decision. [5] We consider the following issues: • Did Mrs Woodroffe provide timely advice about security for costs? • Did Mrs Woodroffe’s conduct in the radio programme breach professional standards? • Did Mrs Woodroffe’s email of 3 December 2020 breach professional standards? • If she breached standards, at what level is this conduct? Did she provide timely advice about security for costs? [6] Mrs Woodroffe first received instructions in February 2015....

8. ACCDR COVID-19 Alert Level 2 Protocol [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...use of remote technology or by adjournment as agreed by the parties. 2 Accident Compensation Appeals jurisdiction in the District Comi, managed by Tribunals, Wellington will receive new matters and existing matters will be reviewed . regularly by email. All communications including queries on any matter and filing of all documents are to be by email to email address AppealsACR@justice.govt.nz. Given the restrictions under Level 2, there will be delay in responding to matters. 3 If a...

9. Notice of change of address for service [doc, 34 KB]

   ...exchange for direction to ……………………………………………………[document exchange box number]; or (c)
transmitting it to the party/party's solicitor* by fax to ………………………….. [fax number]; or
 (d)
emailing it to the party/party's solicitor* at ……………………………………. [email address]. Omit this paragraph if email service will not be accepted. Signature of plaintiff …………………………………….. Date:...

10. [2007] NZEmpC AC 45/07 Wyatt v Simpson Grierson Parternship [pdf, 97 KB]

    ...information by February 2001. It was apparent from the balance of his evidence that he did draw the conclusion that salary and fee budget for staff solicitors at Simpson Grierson were generally fixed in the ratio of 1 to 4.5. On 22 May 2001, he emailed Rob Gapes, his team leader at Simpson Grierson, saying I am seeking an explanation for the figures set out in the firm’s letter to me notifying me the result of the 2001 Remuneration Review. The last sentence on the third page of...