Search Results

1. AD & Anor v ZU LCRO 60/2013 (3 March 2014) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...[20] Mr ZU says he discussed with the ADs the prospect of them making an application for legal aid, and advised them early on that they had too many assets to qualify for a grant of aid. [21] The decision1 records that the Committee considered emails between Mr AD and Mr ZU that addressed legal aid2, finding that Mr AD had asked about legal aid, and Mr ZU had responded advising the ADs that they would not qualify because they owned too much property. The Committee was satisfied w...

2. LCRO 144/2016 QT v UF (24 August 2018) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...reimbursement of Mr QT’s invoice paid by her to uplift the loan documents. Application for review [25] Mr QT forwarded his application for review of both determinations, in which he seeks to overturn the Committees findings, to this Office by email on 21 June 2016. The following day, 22 June 2016, this Office received from him both the original of his application, and the filing fee of $50. [26] He claims that by having emailed his application to this Office on 21 June 2016...

3. [2022] NZREADT 23 - CAC 1904 v Bright (8 November 2022) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...route, via the main road. [13] On the next day, 4 July 2019, the complainant made a verbal complaint to Ms Jordan. She said that Mr Bright had made her feel very uncomfortable, but she did not divulge details of the complaint. Ms Jordan sent an email that afternoon to Tom Rutherford, the agency’s owner and manager, alerting him to a possible complaint by a woman against Mr Bright. Ms Jordan sent an email to the complainant on 6 July 2019 setting out the contact details of the...

4. CAC20003 v Wright [2015] NZREADT 25 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...2. The licensee denied this in a letter to REAA dated 3 July 2013. He stated: Not so. I will forward all these to you no later than 10 July 2013. 3. The statements were not provided on 10 July 2013. 4. On 1 November 2013, the licensee emailed the investigator for REAA, stating: 3 It is looking like I need an extension till 5pm Monday 4th November. This is due to unforeseen circumstance’s (sic) at my end. I currently have found my file that includes all the mont...

5. Hahn v Walke [2019] NZIACDT 19 (8 April 2019) [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...in-house legal counsel of the Migration International Group, threatening him with legal action in respect of his defamatory accusations. [38] The Authority first raised the complaint with Ms Walke on 23 January 2018. There followed an exchange of emails and correspondence between the Authority and Mr Chang. [39] On 31 January 2018, Mr Chang questioned Mr Hahn’s motive as a direct business competitor. According to Mr Chang, there was no evidence that anyone other than Mr Wa...

6. [2021] NZREADT 28 - New Zealand LJ International Limited & Zeng (15 June 2021) [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...Committee 1901. [ii] one charge of misconduct under s 73(c)(i) of the Act, of wilfully or recklessly failing to comply with a Notice issued under s 85 of the Act (“Charge 4”). [3] The charges were served on the Agency and Mr Zeng by email on 30 September 2020. Pursuant to reg 7 of the Real Estate Agents (Complaints and Discipline) Regulations 2009), they were required to file a response to the charges within ten working days. No response was filed by or on behalf of...

7. [2023] NZREADT 11 - CAC 2103 v Lieven (15 May 2023) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...dated 12 February 2018. [9] On 25 July 2019, HH signed a real estate agency agreement with the agency appointing the agency as selling agent. The agency agreement named the selling client as HH and Ms Lieven. [10] On 26 July 2019, Ms Lieven emailed the tenants from the agency’s email address informing them that the property was being put on the market, as required by s 47 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1989 (the RTA). [11] On or about 28 July 2019, Ms Lieven advised the ten...

8. Cheng v Corrections [2025] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 332 KB]

   ...A Minute issued following the pre-hearing teleconference set out this new hearing timetable. [10] On Monday 7 October 2024, the first scheduled day of the hearing, the Tribunal Registrar repeatedly tried unsuccessfully to contact Mr Cheng. By email dated 7 October 2024 timed at 12.32pm the Registrar (at the direction of the Tribunal) advised Mr Cheng that the Tribunal had decided to defer the starting time of the hearing to 2.15pm 5 Applicable to the Privacy Act 2020 pursuant to...

9. CAC10027 v Brankin [2013] NZREADT 32 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...(the defendant) and clients. (d) That the defendant restricted the complainant’s hours in the office and instructed her she was not allowed more than ten listings at any one time. (e) That the defendant accessed the complainant’s private emails. (f) That the defendant disclosed to a friend of his private and confidential details with respect to a client for whom he was acting.” [2] “Misconduct” is defined under s.73 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 as follows...

10. Schiller-Cooper v Lozano [2013] NZIACDT 1 (08 January 2013) [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...Schiller-Cooper complained of various administrative issues, in particular an incorrect address being held for her and it not being corrected promptly when she notified Ms Lozano’s office. [18] She also complained Ms Lozano did not respond to an email of 16 June 2010 until 30 June 2010. Ms Lozano explained the delay as due to being “on and off work” due to family reasons. Ms Schiller-Cooper was concerned, as no mobile telephone number had been supplied and the issue she was pursui...