Search Results

1. [2021] NZIACDT 7 - IMH v Marica (22 March 2021) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...NZIACDT 2. 3 [8] Mr Gimranov filed a visitor visa application with Immigration New Zealand for the complainant on 1 June 2016. Two days later, on 3 June, it was approved, with an expiry date of 3 September 2016. [9] Mr Gimranov sent an email to the complainant on 3 June 2016 confirming that the visitor visa had been approved, valid until 6 September 2016. The same erroneous expiry date was then entered in the immigration consultancy’s client record. [10] Immigration...

2. Pai - Waihi Kahakaharoa 3B2A and Waihi Kahakaharoa 9A (2019) 407 Aotea MB 180 (407 AOT 180) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...immediately, in order to test the amount and quality of honey that might be produced. He was at that time working with a company known as Watson and Son. He was to receive a finder’s fee if the hives were put on the trust land. [6] In an exchange of emails, the trustees expressed support for Mr Livingstone’s proposal, but asked that he provide further details, and a formal written agreement be put in place, before any action was taken to place beehives on the land. Zoe Pai, tru...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 46 UQE v TBN [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...not appointed to the position they had applied for (it appears that TBN was interviewed on 4 July 2019, and the position was filled that month). TBN raised concerns about the comments with their union, enclosing a “to whom it may concern” email from ZUD (dated 2 October 2019). The email set out the alleged comments in detail. It did not specify the date of the conversation. Nor did the email specify the date on which the conversation had been brought to TBN’s attention. T...

4. LCRO 39/2022 RD v QL and ZH (29 November 2023) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...2 Rule 6.3 provides that an information barrier within a firm does not affect the application of, or the obligation to comply with, rr 6.1 or 6.2. Mr CU could not have acted for Ms RD given the conflict of interests already identified by Ms QL. 3 Email CU to ARD (9 October 2020). 3 [14] Ms RD initially instructed [Law Firm D] to act for her and subsequently Mr EW, a partner in the firm of [Law Firm E]. [15] As a condition of entering into a new lease, the trustees of [Trust A] req...

5. January 2016 National Pānui [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...applications and wish to make representations concerning the application, you must notify the Court in the District in which the application is being heard in writing by 4pm on the 5th of January 2015, providing your name and address, telephone number, and email address, if any, and setting out your connections with the applications and brief details of your concerns. The Court may, on considering your notifi cation, arrange for the application to be set down for a formal hearing if the...

6. Steele v Salisbury School (Costs) [2012] NZHRRT 26 [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...made under s 85(1)(a) of the Privacy Act that there has been an interference with Mr Steele’s privacy. [56] We are of the view that no such declaration should be made. Mr Steele’s communications with school management on 19 November 2010 (the email addressed to Mr Heal and copied to Ms Kennedy) and on 21 November 2010 (the email to Ms Davies) were written in aggressive and offensive terms. So too was the email he sent to Mr Dennis on 25 November 2010 making a request under the Priv...

7. FS v UR LCRO 247 / 2010 (12 October 2011) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...email) to limit his time to „approximately 2 hours”. The following week, in another email to the Practitioner, the Applicant said he asked the Practitioner to advise if he were able to keep his time to “another hour or two.” Copies of the emails were included in the complaint. The Applicant said that the Practitioner did not respond and he reiterated this email the following day. [4] The Applicant advised that the Practitioner reported back to him in two emails on 5 Oc...

8. Y v R LCRO 57 / 2009 (9 June 2009) [pdf, 30 KB]

   ...view a very hard line while at the same time G would be making statements and offers which were inconsistent with him having given instructions for Lawyer R to take an aggressive stance. [5] At the centre of this complaint is a paragraph in an email Complainant Y wrote to her client on 17 December 2007 in the context of this relationship property dispute. That paragraph stated: I think you have to understand that Lawyer R may be the problem one he probably thinks G is his best c...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 181 Evans v JNJ Management Ltd [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...shown a revised roster that did not include him or any other JNJ security staff. Nevertheless, he was advised that Mr Kwak, the Director of JNJ, wanted him to stay on and continue as Head of Security. [17] Following that meeting, Mr Evans emailed the new security firm to arrange a time to discuss the new implementation and training. The following day, 28 February 2019, Mr Evans emailed Mr Kwak setting out some “major concerns” that he had. The first concern was regarding...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 59 Johnson v Chief of the NZ Defence Force [pdf, 246 KB]

    ...application for costs following a successful challenge. [2] In the substantive judgment, I found that Mr Johnson had established a disadvantage grievance.1 The New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) had conducted an inquiry as to whether he had sent an email to the office of the Deputy Prime Minister. It was concerned there had been a security breach. Mr Johnson presented statements 1 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force...