Search Results

1. Independent review of intelligence and security - call for submissions [pdf, 951 KB]

   ...say Submissions will be open until 5pm on Friday 14 August 2015. You can make a submission online at https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/independent/iris, or by completing the “Submission” section of this document. Written submissions can be emailed to IRISsupport@justice.govt.nz or posted to IRIS Support Team, Ministry of Justice, Level 3 – Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street, Wellington, DX SX10088. What will happen to your submission? Your submission will help the independent...

2. Suresh v Elizabeth [2019] NZIACDT 45 - Sanctions (3 July 2019) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...the number of points for automatic selection from 140 to 160. The complainant was accordingly no longer eligible for automatic selection. [11] On 12 October 2016, the complainant initiated a complaint with BMS. There followed discussions and emails between the complainant and the staff in relation to his complaint about delay and request for a refund. [12] There was a telephone discussion between the complainant and a manager on 15 October 2016 concerning his complaint. He was t...

3. Auckland Standards Committees 3 and 4 v Banbrook [2017] NZLCDT 35 [pdf, 404 KB]

   ...on the understanding the Practitioner would pay her fines, she paid him $3,000 on 20 August 2011, $2,000 on 8 September 2011, and $1,000 on 23 September 2011. These payments were made by deposits into his bank account. She sent him a number of emails on the relevant dates confirming payment to him of monies for the fines, all of which have the subject heading “re: payment of arrears of fines”. Despite this, the Ministry of 7 Justice never received the payments from the Prac...

4. Song v CAC 20008 & Clement [2014] NZREADT 54 [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...prior to him and his wife signing the sale and purchase agreement. [33] The Complainant submits that the Licensee only informed him about the title issue after he had signed the sale and purchase agreement and that was by a Monday 22 April 2013 email. 7 [34] In response, the Licensee has claimed that she had visited the Complainant and his wife prior to them making an offer and had explained to them that a new title would be issued and that they should consult a lawyer on the...

5. LCRO 84/2020 WF v BP (11 June 2020) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...time frames for filing an application. (b) Confirmed that a filing fee was required to be lodged with the application. (c) Provided advice as to the information that needed to be filed with the application. [33] Mr WF filed his application by email on the afternoon of Thursday 14 May 2020, and when doing so, confirmed that the filing fee would be paid separately, on that day. Mr WF’s application made no reference to his ability to file his application having been affected by CO...

6. TQ v FW LCRO 214/2015 (27 September 2016) [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...separated, they arranged to share the care of their children on a three-day rotation basis. However, as at June 2015, Mr TQ’s view was that over the previous two years since separation, the children 2 Email TQ to NZLS (14 September 2015). 3 Above n 1. 3 had primarily been in his care,4 and that the “current care regime” is that he has “custody”.5 He says Ms RT has “a diagnosed mental illness” and hints at alcohol- r...

7. [2020] NZIACDT 23 - Y(O)R v Tian (8 June 2020) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...complainant, including her husband and their dependent son. An adult son was not migrating with them. [7] The entrepreneur visa was declined by Immigration New Zealand on 7 August 2015. That letter was addressed to Ms Tian and sent to her by email and by post. She did not advise the complainant of the decision. [8] On 14 July 2016, Ms Tian sent an email to the complainant’s husband asking him to prepare a long list of documents. This is alleged by the complainant to relate t...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 54 Chen v NZ Sugar Co Ltd [pdf, 42 KB]

   ...does not drink alcohol and considered the functions involved a lot of late night drinking. He did attend the company Christmas lunch just prior to Christmas. [14] In January 2008 Ms Gilroy arrived back to work from leave to be faced with an email from Mr Chen advising that he disagreed with the outcomes of the December counselling session. At some point in January 2008 he pointedly asked Ms Gilroy how he could make a complaint against her. Somewhat graciously on her part she...

9. NA v AL LCRO 68 / 2011 (10 April 2012) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...discretion to grant interim relief especially because of the question of delay. This is pivotal in my discretion to refuse the interim remedy. [23] The Applicants’ complaint was that they had specifically instructed the Practitioner, by email of 5 September, to file litigation on 8 September 2006, but the proceeding was not filed until 5 October. They conclude that had the proceeding been filed on 8 September there would have been no third party, and no impediment to their a...

10. [2021] NZIACDT 7 - IMH v Marica (22 March 2021) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...NZIACDT 2. 3 [8] Mr Gimranov filed a visitor visa application with Immigration New Zealand for the complainant on 1 June 2016. Two days later, on 3 June, it was approved, with an expiry date of 3 September 2016. [9] Mr Gimranov sent an email to the complainant on 3 June 2016 confirming that the visitor visa had been approved, valid until 6 September 2016. The same erroneous expiry date was then entered in the immigration consultancy’s client record. [10] Immigration...