Search Results

Search results for email.

9628 items matching your search terms

  1. OIA-124649.pdf [pdf, 3.1 MB]

    ...ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 8 September 2025 Our ref: OIA 124649 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Ministerial Advisory Group for victims of retail crime and facial recognition technology I refer to your email of 4 June 2025 to Hon Paul Goldsmith, Minister of Justice requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Ministerial Advisory Group (MAG) for victims of retail crime and the Privacy Commi...

  2. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (HDC Act) [2020] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 434 KB]

    ...Mrs Marshall on four occasions found medication down the side of Eamon’s wheelchair or in his clothing, raising concern that he had not received the medication on those occasions. [4] That concern (and others) were set out by Mr Marshall in an email dated 8 December 2015 addressed to Kai Jugo of the Needs Assessment and Service Coordinator (NASC) service of the Hawke’s Bay District Health Board. In the same email Mr and Mrs Marshall expressed their view that Eamon should be transiti...

  3. LAT Form 1 - Application for Review [pdf, 1.6 MB]

    ...review to the Tribunal. 8 How to apply for a review To lodge an application for review you can either: • Complete the application form online; or • Complete this form and forward together with your supporting documents to the Tribunal by email, fax, or post. Contact details are at the end of this form. 9 What happens next? If your application can be accepted, the Tribunal will send a copy of your application to the Legal Services Commissioner. The Tribunal may seek additio...

  4. Respondent TPO Information Pack [pdf, 548 KB]

    ...time, you must apply to the Court and a Judge will decide if you can get bail. Do not contact the Protected person or anyone covered by this Order You cannot contact the Protected person or any of their children. This means no calls, texts, emails, faxes, talking face to face, social media (such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, WhatsApp and others), letters, or any other type of communication. Do not ask or tell someone else to contact them in any way. Read the words...

  5. [2020] NZEmpC 112 Mataura Valley Milk Ltd v Scott [pdf, 225 KB]

    ...to the Mataura Valley’s computer server. That request alerted Ms Morrison to the fact that the laptop had not been returned as agreed. [12] Ms Morrison instructed Focus Technology to end Mr Scott’s access to Mataura Valley’s server. She emailed him on 17 March 2020 and asked for the laptop to be returned as soon as possible. According to Ms Morrison, Mr Scott’s response was that he had reached an agreement with Mr May to continue to hold on to the laptop for three months...

  6. DX v OI Ltd [2019] NZDT 1529 (24 October 2019) [pdf, 146 KB]

    ...argued that DX agreed subsequently to pay OI’s charges. Whatever the actual legal rights of the parties to a contract, where there is a genuine dispute they are free to reach their own agreement to settle the dispute between them. DX did state in an email on 9 August 2018 that she would pay once her insurance claim came through (not realising that her insurance had been cancelled). However, at the same time and repeatedly, she made it clear that she did not believe she was obliged to pay...

  7. [2022] NZEmpC 114 STL Linehaul Ltd v Waters [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...conditions and about how STL could operate more efficiently, but no formal process was put in place to consider a possible restructuring. [10] The only supporting evidence STL produced of its concerns over staffing levels were comments in two emails between the Administration Manager in Auckland and the Office Manager based in Christchurch. Those emails, sent on 15 October 2019, were discussing gossip that was said to be taking place within the Auckland team. The Office Manager...

  8. Q Ltd v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 454 (2 July 2024) [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...and DI discussed Prototype 1 and LS asked for some design changes, that is, that the table be built from lighter steel with wire mesh for the top surface. DI then built a second prototype (“Prototype 2”). 4. On 17 December 2023, DI sent LS an email with an estimate of $2,280 (plus GST) per table based on the Prototype 2 design if 50 tables were purchased, and $2,645.00 (plus GST) per table if 10 tables were purchased, noting that he may be able to bring the price down a bit dependin...

  9. [2025] NZEmpC185 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...similar notice was served on the first plaintiffs which they have satisfied. [9] Fonterra required disclosure from E tū of three categories of documents but only the first one remains alive: 1. Any evidence including but not limited to, letters, emails, written communications, meeting minutes, notes, recordings of oral conversations or other documentation, that outline or discuss the Second Plaintiff’s position communicated to its members and/or to the Defendant and/or Font...