Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 107 Zespri International Ltd v Yu interlocutory [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...relevant information. The IT Expert will then undertake a key word each (Key Word Search) using those key words. (f) The IT Expert is to prepare a report that he will provide to counsel for the parties (Report) that: (i) Lists all email correspondence on the laptop (details to include date of email, sender and all recipients of the email (including blind carbon copied recipients), and the subject line of the email); (ii) Describes all other files on the computer by fi...

2. Spring v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 308 & CAC 403) & Buczkowski [2017] NZREADT 82 [pdf, 325 KB]

   ...Buczkowski explain to Ms Norris and Mr Spring, that Mr Wallwork seemed genuine and that he had visited the house with his wife and/or children. [7] Mr Spring says that Ms Buczkowski stated that the purchaser was known to her. This was reflected in her email to Mr Spring’s lawyer. The evidence is inconclusive as to whether those exact words were used [ie: indicating a prior relationship] or whether she said she “met them” at an open home and knew of them that way. [8] In any...

3. CAC 409 v Wong [2018] NZREADT 8 [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...Prasad-Ganesh and one other) for loading onto the realestate.co.nz website, and commented that “We don’t have a Logo created as yet but it would be a solid ring with the numerical “1” in the centre”. On 23 March 2015 Mr Wong sent Mr Ganesh an email: “We are on”. Mr Wong set out the website name, and his password, and commented “they can add as we want by advising them”. [11] On or about 31 July 2015 the Authority received a complaint made by Mr Newal Singh agains...

4. Peter Thompson v Complaints Assessment Committee 413 & Ajay Rathod [2017] NZREADT 51 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...purchasers, then the licensee is subject to all of a licensee’s obligations under the Act and Rules, not just those that apply to customers. [38] However, having examined the documentary material before the Committee (in the main, letters and emails), there can be no doubt that notwithstanding his acceptance that he would have been perceived to be acting as an agent in respect of potential purchasers, and his description of his role as being as a valuer and consultant, Mr Thomp...

5. LCRO 134/2019 NM v LL (23 October 2020) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...JG on 31 May 2017, Ms LL informed the Tribunal on 6 June 2017 she “accept[ed]” Ms JG had been instructed to act for three of the four claimants, but Mr BT wanted [Ms LL] to continue to act for him. [8] On 7 June 2017, Mr NM requested (by email) Ms LL to “forward all [her] records relating to the claim”. [9] Ms LL’s practice manager responded (by email) to Mr NM on 14 July 2017 explaining that because Ms LL had acted for the claimants since 200[8] she needed to “ret...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 157 Van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd [pdf, 475 KB]

   ...subject matter of the proceeding. [23] In Northland Environmental Protection Society Inc v The Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries, it was held in the circumstances of that case that the extraction and review of some 9,700 emails would not be considered oppressive, since these could be reviewed reasonably quickly and not at a cost disproportionate to what was at issue in the proceeding.9 In any event, the expenses incurred could be reflected in costs awarded a...

7. Hawke's Bay Standards Committee v Queenin [2020] NZLCDT 26 (25 August 2020) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...have regarded Ms Queenin as a suitable candidate. [20] Mr Z admits to having had some anxiety about the letter but signed it with some brief amendments and did nothing further until 26 November. Then, since the matter was still concerning him, he emailed Mr Metcalf to ask why LINZ had required the letter regarding Ms Queenin. [21] Mr Z did not receive a response to the letter until late on 5 December. In his email Mr Metcalf referred to the supervision arrangements “… from an...

8. [2023] NZIACDT 13 - OT v Ramos (24 April 2023) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...released information about a one-off residence visa for certain work visa holders in the country (the 2021 RV instructions or application). Those eligible could apply from 1 March 2022 until 31 July 2022. On 30 September, the complainant sent an email to Ms Ramos asking whether it was great news for him. Ms Ramos replied on the same day to say it was great indeed. Then on 27 December 2021, Ms Ramos sent an email to him stating that she would lodge an application for him and his...

9. LCRO 145/2021 AZ v BY (28 October 2022) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...delayed or prevented progress being made. [22] Rather than changing instructions, Mr AZ says he was pressured to follow Mr BY’s approach. [24] Mr AZ considers Mr BY has breached r 5 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules12 by forwarding emails from him to Mr EV which had the effect of exacerbating tensions between the experts. [25] Mr AZ refers to Mr BY’s terms of engagement which state that he will send interim invoices. Mr AZ speculates that the time records provided...

10. Level two Protocol - AKL - 7 March 2021 [pdf, 116 KB]

    ...https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/MOJ-Health-and-Safety-factsheet-COVID-19-Alert-Level-2.pdf 7. Any concerns about health and safety practices should be raised with the Registrar in the first instance Filing of documents 8. Documents may be filed by post or by email. Documents cannot be filed in person at the Environment Court Registry. 9. A general waiver suspending the requirement to file paper originals and copies is in place. Filing fees 10. Th...