Search Results

1. ENV-2016-AKL-000189 Cabra Rural Developments Limited & Others v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...E39.7.2 Reinstate E39.8.1 Reinstate E39.8.2 Reinstate E15.3(4)(a) Reinstate Appendix 15 Reinstate 15.3 Reinstate Reinstate all Panel provisions relating to rural subdivision. 10. An electronic copy of this notice is being served today by email on the Auckland Council at unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. Waivers and directions have been made by the Environment Court in relation to the usual requirements of the RMA as to service of this notice on other persons. 11 . The follow...

2. PSPLA - Form B: Application for an individual licence [pdf, 642 KB]

   ...additional $27 To confirm how you pay the application fee, visit our website: https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/licences- certificates/pspla/forms-and-fees/ If you need further assistance, then please contact the Authority on: Ph: 0800 477 752 Email: pspla@justice.govt.nz Application fees are non-refundable. Application process In normal circumstances, it will take a month to hear the outcome of your application. If you have a criminal conviction your application may take...

3. LCRO 14/2020 CL v BB (18 December 2020) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...rendered his account in the sum of $3,475 plus GST and disbursements. Ms CL’s complaints [8] Ms CLs letter of complaint summarised the issues that concerned her: “Lack of duty of care – excessive account – $4,171.25, being charged $70 emails to book an appointment and then receive “ok” back.”1 She has analysed the firm’s time records and refers to charges of $70 for minor administrative matters. She also refers to time recorded by Mr BB’s PA. [9] The entry i...

4. LCRO 14/2020 CL v BB (18 December 2020) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...rendered his account in the sum of $3,475 plus GST and disbursements. Ms CL’s complaints [8] Ms CLs letter of complaint summarised the issues that concerned her: “Lack of duty of care – excessive account – $4,171.25, being charged $70 emails to book an appointment and then receive “ok” back.”1 She has analysed the firm’s time records and refers to charges of $70 for minor administrative matters. She also refers to time recorded by Mr BB’s PA. [9] The entry i...

5. Online Final PO Information at Service Pack Respondent [pdf, 461 KB]

   ...Judge will decide if you can get bail. Do not contact the Protected person or anyone covered by this Order You cannot contact the Protected person (this is the person named in the Order) or any of their children. This means no calls, texts, emails, faxes, talking face to face, social media (such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, WhatsApp and others), letters, or any other type of communication. Do not ask or tell someone else to contact them in any way. Read the words...

6. LCRO 133/2019 HM v RN (24 February 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...than fair and reasonable for the services he provided to Mr HM, or that his conduct or the service he provided fell short of a proper professional standard. 1 Letter RN to HM, 6 November 2018. 2 Email [Law Firm] to RN, 6 May 2017. 4 [15] The Committee considered the materials and determined, pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act) that further action on the complaint was not necessary or appropri...

7. 10. JWS 10 - Deemed Permits & Associated Rights of Priorities 2 & 5 July 2021 [pdf, 373 KB]

   ...the Act) of the Resource Management Act 1991(the Act) BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant ENV-2020-CHC-127 Scribe Rachel Currie Date 2nd and 5th July 2021 Venue 2nd July : Otago Regional Council – Manuherekia Room 5th July: Email communication Witnesses For Attendance 2nd July Attendance 5th July Tom De Pelsemaeker (TP) Otago Regional Council All day All day Sally Dicey (SD) Otago Water Resource Users Group/ Beef and Lamb All day Via email Murr...

8. D Ltd v QT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1468 (21 January 2021) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...rubble by midday. At or about midday QT Ltd received the results of the asbestos testing conducted by DF which confirmed that 10 square meters of asbestos was found in the wall of the bathroom (the DF report). 4. On 22 September 2017, QT Ltd emailed D Ltd attaching an invoice totaling $29,444.95 (including GST) for the demolition work. The email explains that the costs have “risen quite considerably by $17,500 + gst over and above the initial quotation estimate” because asbesto...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 47 Farrand Orchards Ltd v Tane [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...meeting between Mr Kerry Farrand and Mr Tane on 8 March 2019, the Authority had not erred by stating there was no accord as to a 90-day trial provision on that occasion.3 (b) A draft individual employment agreement (IEA) was submitted to Mr Tane by email on 17 March 2019. The document was confusing because it contained reference to both a probationary period of 90 days, and a trial period of 90 days. Each was of different effect.4 (c) The covering email of that date suggested al...

10. [2023] NZIACDT 24 WN v Lawlor (25 August 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

    ...Lawlor was successful, with residence being granted on 10 July 2021. [7] Meanwhile, on 16 March 2020, the complainant and Mr Lawlor had signed a service agreement for a work visa for the partner. The complainant cancelled the instruction by email to Mr Lawlor on 13 April 2022. He asked for the original documents back and a discussion about a refund. The complainant sought updates and/or expressly requested the documents and/or a refund on 4 August, 13 August, 7 September, 22...