Search Results

1. [2023] NZIACDT 26 - BL v Registrar (10 October 2023) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...February 2023 (at 10:26 am) requesting assistance with her immigration status as no decision had been made on a reconsideration application, but her interim visa would expire on 8 February 2023. On the same day (at 11:21 am), the adviser sent an email to the appellant asking her to fill out a questionnaire (information sheet) and book a consultation. They would advise her of her options. The cost would be $195.50. The adviser attached the information sheet. An invoice (1 Februa...

2. O Ltd v DI [2022] NZDT 67 (29 March 2022) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...Ltd.’s Terms of Engagement in the form of a PDF file attachment. 2. B of O Ltd phoned DI that same afternoon and a time was arranged for a phone call the following day. On 15 November 2021 there was an initial 54-minute phone call after which DI emailed B (in response to his email request sent during the call) a large number of documents relating to her employment issue. DI says she asked about O Ltd.’s fees during that phone conversation – each party has a different version of t...

3. [2022] NZIACDT 29 - EQ v McCarthy (19 December 2022) [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...another email to Mr McCarthy saying he had been trying to get in touch with him for a couple of months and was starting to worry. He pointed out that Mr McCarthy had received $10,366 and also $5,690 for Immigration NZ. X said he had sent eight emails, phoned 14 times and left five voicemail messages. He had called Mr McCarthy’s mobile phone and his office number. [30] In his email, X stated that the family had gone through a lot of emotional turmoil and cost to prepare all th...

4. [2023] NZIACDT 4 – TC v MacLeod (7 February 2023) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...meeting the annual turnover forecasts in the BP within 12 months. An appeal to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal arguing exceptional circumstances was declined on 13 July 2017. [9] Following Immigration NZ’s decline, Mr MacLeod exchanged emails with the visa officer in an endeavour to lower the third year forecast. On 26 October 2016, the officer said that the forecasted revenue in the BP could not be downgraded. Immigration NZ’s instructions (policy) required the compl...

5. [2025] NZIACDT 36 – BL v Schoeller (17 July 2025) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...Immigration NZ the previous day and it 3 was suggested she apply under s 61 of the Immigration Act 2009.1 The complainant asked whether Ms Schoeller could assist. [8] Ms Schoeller appears to have immediately texted a reply stating she would email what was needed. There followed an exchange of texts between them. [9] Ms Schoeller sent an email that day (at 11:21 am) and later a text (at 11:35 am) stating the complainant would need to fill out the attached questionnaire and bo...

6. CAC 20006 v Richardson [2013] NZREADT 92 [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...Glenis Claydon in relation to the sale of the property. Inter alia, he referred to the formal responses received by the Authority from the defendant and Ms Claydon on 13 October 2011 and generally covered necessary background including the relevant email correspondence. The Evidence of the Defendant [17] The defendant provided a detailed typed brief of evidence and was thoroughly cross-examined by Mr Clancy. [18] At material times, the defendant was the branch manager of Ponsonby E...

7. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 2 v Leach [2024] NZLCDT 19 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...practitioner was a barrister practising at [town] under the name Resolve Law & Mediation. She held herself out as having expertise in relationship property litigation. Factual background 2. On 4 October 2017 Ms H, then of [town], sent an email to the practitioner concerning her prospective instructions to act for her in relationship property proceedings: I would like you to apply to the Family Court on my behalf for a Judge to make out a Court order for the division of proper...

8. Deeming v Whangarei District Council (Discovery) [2015] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...June 2010 following a request by Mr Deeming under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA). From the copy of the documents made available to the Tribunal it would appear redactions were made to most, if not all of the emails to conceal the identity of individuals referred to in the text of the emails, the identity of the persons to whom the emails were sent and in some instances, the identity of the sender of the email. [10] When Mr Deeming complained to...

9. TT v KEN [2019] NZIACDT 64 (11 September 2019) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...meet Messrs P and Q the next day. He advised them about his qualifications, industry background and 3 gave them other information relevant to the immigration criteria. He paid New World R 32,500 on the same day, 23 February.1 [10] In an email on 23 February 2017, Mr Q sent the complainant New World’s client agreement. It made no reference to the adviser. It stated that the company was registered internationally for South Africa, New Zealand, Canada and Australia. A not...

10. Ngog v Tourism Holdings Ltd [2025] NZHRRT 46 [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...relationship with the hiring manager) and his race when terminating his employment application. THL denies the plaintiff’s claim. BACKGROUND [3] In late 2023 the plaintiff applied for a position at THL. On 5 January 2024 the plaintiff received an email from the manager of the relevant team at THL, EHI, advising him that she was interested in his application and requesting a 15-minute phone interview. [4] The phone interview took place with EHI on 9 January 2024. Following t...