Search Results

1. DT Application for rehearing [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...and contact person below. Organisation includes an incorporated company or other incorporated entity (for example - an incorporated society/charitable trust). Full legal name Contact person Contact information You will need to provide both an email (if you have one) and a physical address. Your email address and phone number are not able to be confidential and will be shared with the other parties where necessary. Your physical and postal addresses are confidential and will not be sh...

2. QL v GT Ltd [2022] NZDT 129 (9 September 2022) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 129 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT GT Ltd The Tribunal orders: QL is not liable to pay the sum of $5,007.83 to GT Ltd. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business email compromise (BEC) fraud. On 26 April 2022, GT Ltd sent a quotation to QL for the cost of carpeting her house with a [Bank 1] account number for payment. QL rang and discussed some changes, then...

3. DT-Claim-form-v2.pdf [pdf, 750 KB]

   ...information) • Additional copies of the form and any supporting documents (do not send originals) you want to present at the hearing for each of the other parties (Please read the important information). Important information Confidentiality Your email address and phone number are not able to be confidential and will be shared with the other parties where necessary. Your physical and postal addresses are confidential and will not be shared by registry staff. If you want to keep your...

4. Crick v REAA & Woodley [2013] NZREADT 9 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...ponding/pooling issue and that was to ensure that costs were kept to a level acceptable to the vendors in satisfying the Condition that the vendor pay for certain remedial work. [6] The Complainant also alleged that the Licensee deliberately edited an email of 7 February 2011 to avoid detection of his behaviour. [7] On 20 December 2010 there was a series of important emails from the Complainant to the Licensee regarding builders being appointed for both parties (i.e. vendors and pu...

5. [2021] NZREADT 11 - Beath v The Real Estate Agents Authority, Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd, Kemp & Scoble (22 March 2021) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...following: 4 See the Tribunal’s decision in Eichelbaum v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 303) [2016] NZREADT 3 (affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Nottingham v Real Estate Agents Authority [2017] NZCA 1. 5 See Nottingham, at [81]. [a] Emails dated 4 and 6 March 2019 (which refer to emails and documents relating to the March 2015 transaction); [b] Cross-claim documents in a High Court civil proceeding brought by Mr Beath against the vendors of the property, the Agency...

6. 3-Strikes-Proactive-Release-OIA-Requests_Final_Part1.pdf [pdf, 20 MB]

   ...indicated where the final version may be found. Correspondence between the Ministry, the office of the Associate Minister of Justice, and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet have been captured and are detailed in the tables below. Some emails with other external agencies are also included because they were circulated internally. Some information has been withheld under the following provisions of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) to protect privacy of natural persons, �...

7. LCRO 41/2015 CL v JW and IB (26 June 2018) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...fixed. [6] On instructions from Mr CL, Ms WX, a lawyer at the firm, advised HK at 4.53 pm that Mr CL would consider GMY’s proposals over the weekend. She then logged off her computer and left work. [7] On behalf of GMY, HK then sent another email at 4.54 pm saying that the building condition was satisfied (HK’s email). [8] Ms WX did not see HK’s email, nor, it seems did anyone else at Mr JW’s firm. No one at Mr JW’s firm disclosed the arrival of HK’s email, or...

8. Third Party User Guide FINALv2.pdf [pdf, 914 KB]

   ...request ............................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Complete on applicant's behalf .................................................................................. 9 2.2 Email applicant .........................................................................................................11 2.3 Complete with applicant ..........................................................................................

9. Third Party User Guide [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...request ............................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Complete on applicant's behalf ................................................................................... 9 2.2 Email applicant .......................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Complete with applicant ..........................................................................................

10. [2014] NZEmpC 117 Hutchison v Nelson City Council re-issued [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...derision”. The meetings which she attended took place on 10 June, and 14 and 20 July 2011. [12] By early August 2011, difficulties between Ms Hutchison and her managers had become more pronounced. For her part, Ms Hutchison wrote a series of emails outlining her concerns as to what was being required of her; she said, in short, that she was not feeling supported. [13] Mr Louverdis told Ms Hutchison that his preferred choice of communication was not by email, but by face-to-...