Search Results

1. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 v van Noort [2024] NZLCDT 33 (17 October 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...addressing the issues discussed during the meeting, including bringing the Trust documents into order. 21. On 3 March 2020, the Practitioner was provided with information related to the invested funds forming part of the assets of the Trust.6 22. By email dated 3 March 2020, KK thanked the Practitioner for taking the time to meet, and advised the K Siblings looked forward to receiving the Practitioner’s proposal.7 In the email he stated that he and J had only recently learned that h...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 13 NZ Post Primary Teachers Assn & Gray v Cambridge High School & Secretary for Education [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...longer in contention. The hearing before me was confined to two issues relating to disclosure. [2] The defendants seek disclosure (to which the plaintiffs object) of: 1. a list of the first plaintiff’s, (NZPPTA) members; 2. internal NZPPTA emails between NZPPTA officials or employees regarding an email from Ms Sarah Borrell of 15 July 2011, the subject line of which was “Without prejudice proposal around qualifications”. [3] The proceeding involves the interpretation an...

3. DT Application for rehearing [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...and contact person below. Organisation includes an incorporated company or other incorporated entity (for example - an incorporated society/charitable trust). Full legal name Contact person Contact information You will need to provide both an email (if you have one) and a physical address. Your email address and phone number are not able to be confidential and will be shared with the other parties where necessary. Your physical and postal addresses are confidential and will not be sh...

4. QL v GT Ltd [2022] NZDT 129 (9 September 2022) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 129 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT GT Ltd The Tribunal orders: QL is not liable to pay the sum of $5,007.83 to GT Ltd. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business email compromise (BEC) fraud. On 26 April 2022, GT Ltd sent a quotation to QL for the cost of carpeting her house with a [Bank 1] account number for payment. QL rang and discussed some changes, then...

5. Disputes Tribunal claim form [pdf, 354 KB]

   ...information) • Additional copies of the form and any supporting documents (do not send originals) you want to present at the hearing for each of the other parties (Please read the important information). Important information Confidentiality Your email address and phone number are not able to be confidential and will be shared with the other parties where necessary. Your physical and postal addresses are confidential and will not be shared by registry staff. If you want to keep your...

6. Crick v REAA & Woodley [2013] NZREADT 9 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...ponding/pooling issue and that was to ensure that costs were kept to a level acceptable to the vendors in satisfying the Condition that the vendor pay for certain remedial work. [6] The Complainant also alleged that the Licensee deliberately edited an email of 7 February 2011 to avoid detection of his behaviour. [7] On 20 December 2010 there was a series of important emails from the Complainant to the Licensee regarding builders being appointed for both parties (i.e. vendors and pu...

7. NE v Accident Compensation Corporation (Interpretation of decision) [2025] NZACC 155 (22 September 2025) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...panic disorder and dissociative amnesia. She has had and continues to have a significant number of appeals to this Court in respect of cover, entitlement, and jurisdictional matters. [6] Two appeals were heard together. The first concerns an email dated 28 June 2022, which was in response to NE requesting to change her covered diagnosis from PTSD to Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD). The email proposed a psychiatric assessment to help the Corporation to consider the...

8. [2021] NZREADT 11 - Beath v The Real Estate Agents Authority, Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd, Kemp & Scoble (22 March 2021) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...following: 4 See the Tribunal’s decision in Eichelbaum v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 303) [2016] NZREADT 3 (affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Nottingham v Real Estate Agents Authority [2017] NZCA 1. 5 See Nottingham, at [81]. [a] Emails dated 4 and 6 March 2019 (which refer to emails and documents relating to the March 2015 transaction); [b] Cross-claim documents in a High Court civil proceeding brought by Mr Beath against the vendors of the property, the Agency...

9. 3-Strikes-Proactive-Release-OIA-Requests_Final_Part1.pdf [pdf, 20 MB]

   ...indicated where the final version may be found. Correspondence between the Ministry, the office of the Associate Minister of Justice, and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet have been captured and are detailed in the tables below. Some emails with other external agencies are also included because they were circulated internally. Some information has been withheld under the following provisions of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) to protect privacy of natural persons, �...

10. LCRO 41/2015 CL v JW and IB (26 June 2018) [pdf, 241 KB]

    ...fixed. [6] On instructions from Mr CL, Ms WX, a lawyer at the firm, advised HK at 4.53 pm that Mr CL would consider GMY’s proposals over the weekend. She then logged off her computer and left work. [7] On behalf of GMY, HK then sent another email at 4.54 pm saying that the building condition was satisfied (HK’s email). [8] Ms WX did not see HK’s email, nor, it seems did anyone else at Mr JW’s firm. No one at Mr JW’s firm disclosed the arrival of HK’s email, or...