Search Results

1. [2021] NZIACDT - 12 EM v Yong (3 June 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...8,100.42 ($A 2,575, plus 6% tax) was issued by Kitson on 11 April 2019 and was paid on the same day. [10] The assessment was arranged by Kitson’s unqualified staff, Mr P and Ms U (Ms U). The client dealt only with them. There were over 30 emails and seven ‘WhatsApp’ 3 messages between the client and the staff, many of which were copied to Mr Yong. But there were no replies from him. Nor did he make any file notes recording any interaction between him and the client....

2. KC v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2022] NZACC 224 [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...relating to her work in 2014. The parties have also obtained a further psychiatric assessment by consent. The assessor, Dr Turner, also could not identify a mental injury as a result of a Schedule 3 event. [27] On 21 November 2020, the appellant emailed the Corporation referring to mental health treatment investigations in 2014 involving the DHB. She explained that a mental health assessment was undertaken, that she was getting treatment for tuberculosis exposure in 2014 and that...

3. [2024] NZIACDT 29 INZ v Li (6 December 2024) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...client, to seek visas for the client and others. They were supposedly to work as car groomers for the employer. [7] On 15 August 2023, MQ, an unlicensed agent, sent documents concerning the client to Ms Li and asked her to check them. [8] Ms Li emailed the services contract to MQ on 16 August 2023 asking her to obtain the client’s signature. The copy produced to the Tribunal shows the client’s name typed in the place for his signature.1 There is an electronic signature of Ms...

4. [2010] NZEMPC 137 NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union v Steelfort Engineering Co Ltd [pdf, 40 KB]

   ...backwards we feel that an acceptable result will have been achieved. [9] Between April and June 2009 there were a number of bargaining related meetings or discussions between Ms Reid and Mr Keenan and on 18 June 2009 Mr Keenan sent Ms Reid an email, marking the start of a short exchange of correspondence, which figured prominently in the course of the hearing. Mr Keenan’s email was obviously sent in response to queries that had been raised by Ms Reid in the course of the bargai...

5. Easthope v Pirikia - Te Ngae Farm Trust (2012) 62 Waiariki MB 92 (62 WAR 92) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...(Counsel for the applicants) Mr C Linkhorn (Counsel for the Crown) Mr McKechnie (Counsel for the respondents) Judgment: 8 October 2012 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD Copies to: Donna Hall: Woodward Law - email: info@mokoia.co.nz Chris La Hatte: Barrister - email: chris@lahatte.co.nz Brendan Hall: Sandford & Partners - email: brendan@sandfordpartners.co.nz Murrary McKechnie: Barrister - email:mmckechnie@xtra.co.nz Craig Linkhorn: Cro...

6. Turner v The University of Otago (Legal Professional Privilege Claim) [2016] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...2016 the narrative will necessarily be brief and restricted to matters which are not in issue. BACKGROUND [5] Reliance on the s 29(1)(f) legal professional privilege withholding ground appears to have been first asserted by the University in an email dated 18 June 2013 from Mr BCS Dorking (representing the University) to Mr W Forster (representing Dr Turner). A particularised list of the documents for which the privilege was claimed was subsequently provided by the University to the P...

7. Cutaran-Tanggaan v Earnshaw [2012] NZIACDT 61 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...Cutaran- Tanggaan she could do little to assist her, due to “the recession, and illnesses in the family”. She undertook to return the professional fees paid by Ms Cutaran-Tanggaan. However, she has not done so. [13] Ms Cutaran-Tanggaan produced emails evidencing promises by Ms Earnshaw to refund fees, which included the following emails from Ms Earnshaw to Ms Cutaran-Tanggaan: [13.1] 14 July 2009 — Ms Earnshaw said she had “put forward your request for a refund less of course...

8. EHQ v NKN [2013] NZIACDT 65 (20 September 2013) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...been started. 16. The complainant was provided with accommodation owned by Mr Taylor’s ex-wife. 17. The complainant was not successful in finding his own employment and left New Zealand in August 2011. 18. On 18 August 2011 the complainant emailed the adviser’s company and the New Zealand company, stating that he was taking the first step described in 4 the complaints procedure, and expressing his dissatisfaction with their services. 19. On 22 August 2011, the...

9. IJ v BLV [2014] NZIACDT 38 (25 March 2014) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...indicates: [14.12.1] The complainant’s job offer dated 17 February 2012 was essential before the process of applying for a work visa could commence. [14.12.2] The prospective employer contacted the adviser on 21 February 2012, the same day the adviser emailed the employer setting out the documents required, and he prepared the work visa application and sent it to the employer who submitted it to Immigration New Zealand (received on 9 March 2012). Poor communication [14.13] The co...

10. Chung and Lok v Yap [2014] NZIACDT 66 (30 May 2014) [pdf, 149 KB]

    ...the complainants. [9.3] On 14 December 2011, the adviser’s practice entered two agreements related to applying for Long-Term Business Visas to enter New Zealand. The adviser signed the agreements. [9.4] Later that month an unlicensed employee emailed the complainants a checklist of information and documents required to submit their applications for visas. The adviser was a recipient of the email. 3 [9.5] One of the unlicensed employees referred the complainants to a...