Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 118 A v Ms B [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...subsequent GST returns. 7. In addition, following the forensic investigation of [Ms B’s] laptop we have identified the following events of questionable behaviour, including: 7.1 Forwarding a police report sent to [A] to her private email address. 7.2 Fake supplier invoices. 7.3 Batch payments that include misappropriated payments. 7.4 Sending out a falsified email under the guise of the former Finance Manager ... to [Ms B’s] personal email address with fake pa...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 100 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...less than he was ultimately awarded. [5] The exhibit is a collection of correspondence between Mr AlKazaz’s then lawyer and Enterprise IT’s lawyer. It consists of a letter from his lawyer to Enterprise IT’s lawyer and several follow-up emails between them all of which are labelled as being without prejudice save as to costs. The collection is incomplete, because his lawyer’s letter is a reply to an earlier letter that is not part of the exhibit. [6] There are two bases...

3. Tata v Katipa - Waiwhakaata 3E4C Lot 2A [2018] 170 Waikato Maniapoto MB 123 (170 WMN 123) [pdf, 692 KB]

   ...amount paid to Mrs Martin’s account of $37,803.34. [97] As noted, Mrs Martin also argued that all accounts and financial records were handed to Mr and Mrs Tata at the meeting at their house in 2010. In cross-examination, Mr Hope produced an email dated 2 January 2012 from Mrs Martin to Maria Graham, a member of the Court staff, where Mrs Martin said: At another level, I presented all financial reports and minutes of Hiiona Marae meetings held to support financial decisions from...

4. LCRO 69/2021 ID v KZ and UG (7 September 2023) [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...have the cash resources to meet the judgment. There was negotiation with the vendors over terms and timing of payment. [64] Mr ID says it was him who drew attention to the trustee limitation of liability clause in the purchase agreement. The email correspondence at the time appears to confirm that it was Mr KZ who drew the clause to Mr ID’s attention. In any event, this raised the issue of the negligence of the complainants’ previous solicitors, [law firm B]. Negotiations were...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 168 AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 545 KB]

   ...faced by the Prosecutions team was that there were a number of relationship difficulties within the team. Most of these difficulties appear to have revolved around the working relationship between AJY and another CO, PFD. Both AJY and PFD sent emails to Mr Stapleford, Acting Security Manager, each raising concerns about the other. There was subsequently a meeting on 14 August 2017 in which they were advised to “start afresh”. [11] However, the relationship difficulties were...

6. Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Strike-Out Application) [2017] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 439 KB]

   ...Pharmacy allegations were also made against the four directors of the pharmacy (including Mr Burnett). The allegations against Mr Burnett are multiple but all appear to be made against him in his capacity as director of Hamilton Pharmacy. [20] By email dated 7 August 2015 the solicitors for Hamilton Pharmacy and Mr Burnett made representations to the Privacy Commissioner outlining why, in their submission, it would be inappropriate for the Commissioner to investigate the complaint made...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 215 Stewart v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 318 KB]

   ...season. He declined to do so, believing that there were, what he described as “flaws” and/or “illegalities”. He said these were similar to the problems that had featured in the 2019/2020 IEA, which he had also declined to sign. He sent an email that day to the Plant Manager, Mr David Berry, saying that he would not be signing the document in its current form, and noting that he had instituted an employment relationship problem in the Employment Relations Authority regarding...

8. LCRO 130/2022 FN v EO (31 October 2023) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...The Lawyer did not have a mobile phone number for Ms EO and all oral communication was done with an interpreter present (Ms EO did speak good [Language B] but was apprehensive when serious matters were being discussed). b. Regular oral (and some emailed) updates were provided to the [Language] interpreter who worked within [Law Firm A] and the Lawyer understood Ms EO was happy with the level of reporting. c. [Law Firm A] frequently operates on fixed fee invoicing and does not usual...

9. [2024] NZREADT 43 - TL v CAC 2204 LS Ray White (5 November 2024) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...building which were available for short-term accommodation. The licensee’s mother was a director of the rental company. The licensee acknowledged she had an “involvement” with this company.1 [6] On 1 June 2022, the listing agent forwarded by email to the vendor the initial offer from the purchasers.2 She disclosed that the purchasers were relatives of a colleague, so a valuation was required. It was recommended the vendor obtain independent legal advice. [7] The list...

10. TG v Ma [2025] NZIACDT 27 (27 May 2025) [pdf, 332 KB]

    ...provided assistance to the complainant in the visa application form, or alternatively a breach of cls 1 or 31(a) of the Code. 2. Misrepresenting the complainant to Immigration NZ, or alternatively a breach of cls 1 or 29(d). 3. Providing a false email address for the complainant in the visa application form, or alternatively a breach of cl 1. 4. Providing a false and misleading employment agreement with the visa application, or alternatively a breach of cl 1 or 31(a). Negligence...