LCRO 97/2019 DH v MB (29 June 2020) [pdf, 273 KB]
...declaration “to achieve a positive outcome”, namely, to enable [Ms DH] to obtain a disability support pension in [Country A]. Not “to put at risk the 71.1% share [Ms DH] held for her sister and [Ms DH]”. [105] To that end, Ms DH refers to her emails to Mrs RS (a) on 7 May 2015 that the property was not to be treated as [Ms DH’s] “investment property until [Mrs RS’s] “death” or “permanent mental disablement”, and (b) on 8 May 2015 reiterating that she and her...