Search Results

1. ENV-2016-AKL-000270 Tram Lease Limited v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...the designated area. (b) Deleting advice note 1.d. entirely. 9.2 Such alternative, consequential or further relief as may be appropriate to give effect to this appeal. 9.3 Costs. 10 An electronic copy of this notice is being served today by email on the Auckland Council at unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. 5 Waivers and directions have been made by the Environment Court in relation to the usual requirements of the RMA as to service of this notice on other persons....

2. LH v NT LCRO 86/2015 (20 April 2016) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...2 LCRO 249/2012 at [33] – [35]. 3 Stephen Todd (ed), The Law of Torts in New Zealand (6th ed, Thomson Reuters, Wellington, 2013) at [5.1]. 5 [21] The surveyor reiterated this point to Mr LH by email on 6 January 2014, saying that “I cannot confirm that any building work was within time.” [22] Mr LH continued to believe that he had an arguable case on the basis that the producer statements issued within the 10 year time limit

3. LCRO 245/2014 and 156/2015 TM v BS and Law Firm A (15 August 2017) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...executor.” [19] The Committee determined that the complaint had been disposed of in 2005 by the [Area] Complaints Committee and that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the complaint again. 5 Email TM to Lawyers Complaints Service (4 September 2014) at [5]. 6 Standards Committee determination (29 September 2014) at [6]. 7 At [3]–[4]. 4 LCRO 156/2015 [20] In May 2015 Mr TM made another complaint that BS and Law Fi...

4. LCRO 277/2016 CH v DS (7 March 2019) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...the content of the letter was entirely appropriate. DS was making reference to the issues that had arisen between the couple with regards to one of their properties, including VN’s access and use of the property. CH had provided confirmation via email that he did not intend to restrict VN’s access to the property. This was acknowledged and the comments did not carry the connotation CH had attributed to them. It was also the case that should CH be concerned that the letter may be...

5. Otago Standards Committee v Zhao [2020] NZLCDT 19 (6 July 2020) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...a course. Although he appealed the Tribunal’s decision, and that decision was not available until 5 17 August 2017, he enrolled and paid for the April 2017 course. It happened to be a Schedule 1 course. [16] On 19 April 2017 he emailed a Law Society officer, advising that he had studied the course workbook but was unable to attend the examination because he had high blood pressure associated with his diabetes. He asked if he could postpone the examination or attend...

6. LCRO 13/2015 UP v HQ (19 June 2018) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...Agreement”.1 [9] Mr HQ explains what occurred next: 2.5 On 15 April 2014 [Law firm] requested a copy of the final agreement from us. A personal assistant from our office attached the signed page to what was unfortunately the draft agreement. This was emailed to [Law firm]. The mistake was noticed by either [Law firm] or Mr and Mrs UP. When [Law firm] contacted us, we explained what had occurred and apologised for the error. 2.6 However Mr UP purported that given the mistake,...

7. Waitangi-Tribunal-COVID-19-Level-2-protocol-29-October-2021.pdf [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...Māori will be made available through simultaneous translation where possible, and through the published transcript where simultaneous translation is not possible. Filing 18. Any filing with the Waitangi Tribunal should be done, where possible, by email or post. The email and postal addresses for all Waitangi Tribunal filing can be found on the Tribunal’s website at https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/contact-us/. 19. Where email or postal filing is not possible, Tribunal application...

8. [2022] NZIACDT 13 – BU v McCarthy (20 June 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...complainant and her son engaged Mr McCarthy in about December 2017 to assist the complainant’s daughter-in-law, who was unlawfully in New Zealand, in making a s 61 request to Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ).2 He and the son exchanged emails as the evidence supporting the request was compiled. Mr McCarthy wrote to the complainant on 18 April 2018 recording his instruction to seek a s 61 visa. He set out his fees and other matters of engagement. She paid his fee of $4,025...

9. Waitangi Tribunal COVID-19 Level 2 Protocol (29 October 2021) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...Māori will be made available through simultaneous translation where possible, and through the published transcript where simultaneous translation is not possible. Filing 18. Any filing with the Waitangi Tribunal should be done, where possible, by email or post. The email and postal addresses for all Waitangi Tribunal filing can be found on the Tribunal’s website at https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/contact-us/. 19. Where email or postal filing is not possible, Tribunal application...

10. CA v DX & OX [2023] NZDT 17 (21 February 2023) [pdf, 211 KB]

    ...determining liability in this claim. 16. DX and OX told the Tribunal that part of the reason they have not paid anything to CA was because they were told by DC that they were not liable for the vet bill. 17. From what the Tribunal was told, and an email produced from DC, it appears that DC decided not to prosecute DX and OX once Buddy was euthanised. That, however, does not affect CA’s right to seek compensation for damage caused by Buddy before this Tribunal. The email produce...