Search Results

1. [2024] NZIACDT 17 – LB v Luv (23 May 2024) [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...decision has been made by Immigration New Zealand. 14.5 If either You or We terminate this agreement under this clause, We will be entitled to be paid a fair and reasonable fee as agreed. 19. COMMUNICATION 19.1 Our method of consultation is via email to avoid any miscommunication. Office and phone consultations can be requested but are at the discretion of the Adviser. Response times will be in order of urgency and in order of client communication received. Communication will norma...

2. INZ (Calder) v Chiv [2019] NZIACDT 73 (21 October 2019) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...numerous allegations against Mr Chiv. The allegations include unlawfully delegating his work to unlicensed advisers, failing to exercise proper care in relation to visa applications, and breaching his clients’ confidentiality by sending group emails to them. This conduct is said to breach the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) and the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014 (the Code). BACKGROUND [3] Mr Khieng (Kevin) Chiv, was at the relevant time a...

3. [2020] NZIACDT 49 - HQT v Singh (19 November 2020) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...complainant’s statement of reply (19 December 2019) at first attached page, Mr Singh’s further statement of reply (30 January 2020) at [6.4]–[6.7]. 3 Registrar’s documents at 21–26. 3 [8] On the same day, 14 February 2019, Colin sent an email to the complainant referring to the meeting that day and attaching the Client Evaluation Form to be completed and returned. He advised they would then analyse a suitable visa option, most likely a visitor visa for partners. If...

4. LCRO 76/2020 FV v GT (23 July 2021) [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...On the afternoon of [redacted] 2018 and again on the morning of [redacted] 2018, IRD informed Mr GT that they would be proceeding with the liquidation proceedings as no arrangement had been reached. (c) Mr GT had not responded to IRD’s earlier emails or phone calls. (d) On [redacted] 2018 Mr GT’s business partner informed Miss FV that there had been no obligation for Mr GT to attend the hearing on [redacted] 2018. Another law firm subsequently advised Miss FV that this was not...

5. KX and NX v GV Ltd [2022] NZDT 47 (14 January 2022) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...sum of $210.00 within 21 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. In or about May 2021, NX entered into a contract with GV Ltd for the hire of a caravan for the period 4 January 2022 to 13 January 2022. 2. On 17 November 2021, GV Ltd emailed its customers stating: To ensure our staff and customers stay as safe as possible we will be requiring all of our customers over the age of 12 to be double vaccinated (except where there is a valid Ministry of Health exemption) at the...

6. TD v D Ltd [2022] NZDT 70 (1 June 2022) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...for moving household goods from New Zealand to the United States. After reviewing information received, TD accepted the quote provided by D Ltd and signed a contract with that company. 2. Prior to acceptance of the quote, TD had received an email from D recommending all goods be sighted and packed by their crew. If not, D would be unable to provide US Customs with the required inventory, which could result in additional charges being payable for Customs to examine or xray the goods...

7. Enforcement of an access direction - reply (s104) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...Surname Phone/mobile number _______________________________________________________________________ Preferred contact option for this reply. Please choose one and give the details. Email Postal address Email address __________________________________________________________________________ THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Enforcement of access direction - Reply When to use this form Use this form if...

8. COVID-19 Communications to Family Violence Providers [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...Practice – COVID-19 Supplementary Information 2020 May - Family Violence Provider Update 2020 July - Family Violence Provider Update 2 COVID LEVEL GUIDANCE AND FAQ FOR MINISTRY OF JUSTICE PROGRAMME DELIVERY: 24 April 2020 Email to providers 24 April 2020 This document provides specific guidance regarding programme delivery at level 3 and 4 of COVID-19. It is to be read alongside the Code of Practice COVID-19 Supplementary document released on 25 March 2020...

9. LCRO 113/2013 AB v EF (3 August 2017) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...Service did not “keep him informed or ask a single question” of him. [19] On 16 July 2012 the Complaints Service sent Mr EF’s response to the complaint to Mr AB and requested any response he wished to make by 23 July 2012. Mr AB replied by email on 17 July. From then, until the complaint was considered by the Standards Committee at its meeting on 1 March 2013, the Committee provided and sought further information to, and from, Mr AB. [20] Mr AB’s allegations are not suppor...

10. [2025] NZLVT 17 – Topping v Tasman District Council (28 April 2025) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...Tasman District Council (the Council) advised Mr Topping that a decision had been made to alter the valuation. [5] Mr Topping has filed an objection with the Tribunal. The objection form is dated 17 December 2024. The objection was received by email on 18 December 2024. The form was emailed to the Tribunal from Reception Richmond, Tasman District Council, and states that the information was being sent on behalf of Mr Topping. In the objection form Mr Topping states that he rec...