Search Results

1. Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation (on application for leave to appeal) [2025] NZACC 188 [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...Introduction [1] The applicant seeks leave to appeal a decision of Judge Spiller dated 4 June 2025.1 [2] The appeal concerned a review decision dated 4 February 2025 which dismissed an application for review on the basis that the Corporation’s email of 7 November 2024 was not a decision for the purposes of the Act. 1 Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation [2025] NZACC 089. 2 [3] The Court dismissed the appeal. The Corporation opposes the leave to appeal application...

2. JW v QE LCRO 192 / 2011 (19 September 2012) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...the Standards Committee in that complaint was also referred to this Office for review. [6] Mr QE responded to Mr JW’s questions about the manner in which the form had been completed, but Mr JW was not satisfied with the response. A series of email communications between the parties ensued in a somewhat tetchy tone from both parties. [7] The investment with FAI was completed in September 2009 although Mr QE did not confirm this to Mr JW until Mr JW pursued a response. [8]...

3. Ministry of Justice review for the State Services Commission’s Inquiry into the Use of External Security Consultants [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...validated, e.g. are they licensed under the Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority.   6.4. where there is not a contract, considering whether the interaction seems appropriate e.g. is  the  lack  of  contract  explicable,  do  emails  seem  professional,  is  information  exchanged  consistent with what you would expect of state servants.   7. Assurance was to be informed by seven years’ worth of financial records and, on...

4. LCRO 181/2019 SL v GB (29 January 2021) [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...and Ms CS on 13 July 2015.4 [6] On 28 September 2015 Mr DJ served a settlement notice on the vendors’ lawyer who responded on 6 October 2015 with the vendors’ offer to sell the property to [FHL] for $509,000. [7] Ms SL instructed (by email) Mr GB on 8 October 2015 to make a counteroffer of $469,000. The following day, 9 October 2015, Mr DJ informed the vendors’ lawyer that [FHL] rejected the vendors’ offer of $509,000 but would pay $455,000 as provided in the sale agr...

5. AB v IJ, OBO and EF LCRO 203/2014 (29 August 2016) [pdf, 312 KB]

   ...parties that there was a meeting between the persons Mr [IJ] refers to in his complaint. 1 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209. 2 In this decision I refer to [EF]’s Aunt as Ms [TF]. 3 Email [IJ] to Lawyers Complaints Service (20 January 2014). 4 Above n 3. 3 [11] On 25 March Ms [AB] sent an email to Mr [IJ]’s employer thanking him for referring Mr [IJ] to her (the firm) and advising she had obtained instructions d...

6. Environment Court Consolidated COVID-19 Protocol [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...Alternatively, the parties may agree that matters can be heard “on the (electronic) papers”. 5. The Court will be flexible with its procedures and filing deadlines. If deadlines are not able to be met, contact should be made with the registry by email to seek an extension of time. Mediation and expert conferences 6. Any mediations or expert conferences that proceed during this period will be conducted by audio-visual link or telephone. Filing of documents 7. Court docu...

7. Land Valuation Tribunal Consolidated COVID-19 Protocol 7 Sept 2021 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...Alternatively, the parties may agree that matters can be heard “on the (electronic) papers”. 5. The Tribunal will be flexible with its procedures and filing deadlines. If deadlines are not able to be met, contact should be made with the registry by email to seek an extension of time. Mediation and expert conferences 6. Any mediations or expert conferences that proceed during this period will be conducted by audio-visual link or telephone. Filing of documents 7. Documen...

8. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Response Form [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...Commission (EQC), or a person added as a third party respondent, against which the claim is being made. Full name * Contact name (if applicable) Do you agree to receive official documents, letters and notices from the Tribunal by email? * (tick one) Yes, my email address for service is: No, please send to the postal address for service below: Postal address for service* Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Response Form Case Title...

9. L Ltd v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 247 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...based in [City]. 3. At N Ltd.’s request, L Ltd provided a valuation for items of jewellery. The valuation was for an insurance claim made by H, a customer of N Ltd, in respect of stolen jewellery. 4. L Ltd provided the valuation to N Ltd in an email on 5 July. 5. On 8 July, N Ltd replied: Thank you for your email. Please advise which of these items would be able to [be] replaced through your business. Please also advise of any applicable insurance discount for this....

10. PDLA regional contact list - 2023/24 [pdf, 173 KB]

    Coverage Area PAL Name Mobile Email Notes Northland 3 Adam Pell 021 904 005 lawyer@adampell.co.nz Wife speaks German, Slovenian and Croatian Northland 4 Dave Sayes 021 127 4966 criminallaw@xtra.co.nz Northland 2 Jarrod Griffin 027 510 6106 jarrod@jarrodgriffin.co.nz Northland 2 Jonathan Natusch 021 207 5496 jgnatusch@gmail.com Northland 4 Shannon-Leigh Litt 021 131 7410 Lawyerchristchurch40@gmail.com Northland 2 Stephen Nicholson 021 616 723 stemicnic@xtra.co.nz Northland 3 Tracy Spencer...