Search Results

1. ENVC combined interested party notices F to L [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...Environment Court Auckland L--_-'-'-'- NOTICE OF PERSON'S WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS Section 274 Resource Management Act 1991 TO: the Registrar Environment Court PO Box 71 47 Wellesley Street Auckland 1. I [full name] By Email : matiatia@justice.govt. nz wish to be party to the following proceedings: ENV -2013-AKL-0001 7 4 An application under section 87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) . Waiheke Marinas Limited-Applicant (?) I made...

2. LCRO 191/2019 UY v FB (26 November 2020) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...(this later described by him as his third complaint). [9] By way of outcome, Mr UY sought that Ms FB be struck off. [10] On 15 September 2019, Mr UY wrote further to the Complaints Service in which he advised that he had omitted to attach an email to his complaint. [11] In this correspondence Mr UY argued that it was implausible that Ms FB’s failure to serve him with a memorandum could be attributable, as argued by her, to a simple error in typing his email address. [12] Mr UY...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 21 Haldemann LLC v Nelson [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...referencing” in the case of recruitment by Enterprise Recruitment. [7] Ms Nelson filed a statement of defence denying the assertions made by Haldeman LLC in its application. She also filed an affidavit deposing that on 17 November 2014 her lawyer emailed counsel who were then acting for the defendants, a copy of the relevant documents; the three documents described above. Ms Nelson further pleads that she does not have any other documents in either of the categories she was orde...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 23 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...litigation, what was said to be an unreasonably broad range of documentation and that the disclosure amounted to “a fishing expedition or audit of the plaintiff’s employment history”. [4] The plaintiff’s notice of objection was sent by email from the plaintiff’s solicitors to the defendant’s solicitors at 4.31 pm on Friday 23 January 2015. The defendant’s solicitors’ office and (I assume) the office of the relevant person responsible for this litigation at the defen...

5. ET and JT v F Ltd [2021] NZDT 1639 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...success. ET had left messages and sent emails, but had had no response. On 13 January 2020, BS contacted ET and JT, saying that she had had severe hay fever, but that she hoped the claim would be completed within a couple of days. On 24 January, BS emailed again, saying that the submission would be submitted by 31 January. By this time, ET and JT had lost confidence in the ability of F Ltd to complete the work in accordance with its promises, and informed F Ltd on 28 January 2020 that the...

6. [2023] NZIACDT 21 – WN v Lawlor (26 June 2023) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...time a licensed immigration adviser and a director of Lawlor & Associates Ltd, of Thames. [6] On 18 September 2019, Mr Lawlor filed a resident visa application under the skilled migrant category for the complainant. [7] Mr Lawlor sent an email to the complainant on 5 March 2020 attaching a document list for a work visa for his partner. A written service agreement was then entered into by the complainant and Mr Lawlor on 16 March 2020 for the partnership work visa. The fee was...

7. DI & KB v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 375 (14 August 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...inclusion in the [model 1] of tiny home. Therefore, G Ltd has not been found to have breached s9 or s13(g) of the FTA. I make these findings for reasons set out below. 9. I am satisfied that the information G Ltd provided to the Applicants in G Ltd’s emails of 17 May 2022 and 9 September 2022 was not misleading. This is because those emails, viewed objectively, do not promise that a heat pump will be included in a set price for the models of tiny home available through G Ltd. I have...

8. NE v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2025] NZACC 021 (4 February 2025) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 4 November 2022. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review for lack of jurisdiction, on the basis that the appellant’s email of 3 May 2022 did not constitute a valid application for review. 2 Background [2] In 2017, the appellant was granted cover for a sensitive claim. Since then, there have been ongoing disputes regarding cover, entitlements,...

9. LCRO 122/2025 MA v HP (30 September 2025) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...[3] An issue has arisen as to whether this Office has jurisdiction to deal with Mr MA’s review application. The question is whether he has lodged it out of time. 2 Brief timeline [4] The Committee’s decision is dated 5 June 2025. It was emailed to the parties on the same date, using the email addresses to which correspondence had been successfully sent during the Committee’s investigation of Mr MA’s complaint. [5] Mr MA lodged his application to review the Committee’s d...

10. Firmin v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2025] NZACC 190 [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...for the cost of his accountant checking the Corporation’s indexation of his entitlements. On 10 May 2023, the Corporation declined to fund Mr Firmin’s personal accountant because it was not an injury related need. [12] Mr Firmin produced emails dated November 2022 and March 2023 asking the Corporation to provide information to his accountant. An email from Mr Firmin’s accountant dated 1 July 2023 said - The ACC didn’t provide adequate answers to my queries, although the c...