Search Results

1. EA v BO LCRO 237 / 2010 (29 September 2011) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...this decision have been changed. Background [1] This complaint arose in the course of a dispute between ABO and Mr and Mrs EA about the quality of an ESOL course offered by ABO in which Mrs EA was enrolled as a student. [2] Mr EA wrote by email dated 6 May 2010 to ABO expressly identifying himself as Mrs EA’s husband and employer, to complain about the course, and to request a refund of the fees (or at least a waiver of the fees). At the foot of the letter he used the autom...

2. Mabruk v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) and Watson (not participating in appeal) [2018] NZREADT 74 [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...“between 590-615K”. On 7 June, the complainant, Mr Watson, submitted a tender to buy the property $620,000. A tender was also received from Mr Roberts, at $629,000. Neither tender was accepted by the vendors. [10] 8 June, Mr Mabruk sent an email to Mr Watson’s partner: Thank you for your offer. There were multiple offers received. It would appear that the Vendor has found or is looking for a new tenant. If I see any similar property on this price range I will let you...

3. Wilton TRI-2021-100-002 Procedural Order 8 [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...the cladding from Rockcote to Wattyl. 4. Wilton Joubert cannot have any culpability in relation to any lack of control joints within the plaster cladding or any defects claimed by the trustees. [21] It is submitted that the drawings and emails relied on by the council on joinder do not concern any of the matters identified by the assessor or set out in the claim. [22] Furthermore, those communications sent by Mr Wilton from the Wilton Joubert email address which were unr...

4. 2023-06-23-Email-of-counsel-for-HDC-re-Hearing-Venue.pdf [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...(through to 3 November). This involves some juggling on the Council’s part (for example moving the full Council meetings that usually occur on a Wednesday for those two weeks).     Liam, you can liaise with Lauren Baddock of HDC (copied with this email) if/when you are able to formalise arrangements, and for example to add in additional rooms for the Court, if needed. I think there is an ante-room that may be of use, and there are others for a more private meeting space.     For...

5. OIA-112572.pdf [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 18 June 2024 Our ref: OIA 112572 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Voice recording retention I am writing in response to your email of 27 May 2024, where you asked: How long does the MoJ retain: a. voice recordings of High Court proceedings presided over by Judges; and b. voice recordings of telephone conferences presided over by Judges. In brief, I wish to know wh...

6. CAC 414 & 416 v Tafilipepe [2019 ] NZREADT 13 (10 May 2019) [pdf, 332 KB]

   ...that, in the circumstances, he should not have been present at the property without her permission. [11] MPRE identified Ms Tafilipepe as the salesperson who had dealt with Ms Cokojic. Ms Cokojic’s email was forwarded to Ms Tafilipepe, who emailed a response to her at 3.23 pm the same day. She apologised for the “misunderstanding” about [ ]’s identity, and stated that he was “an agent who is new with [MPRE] and is working with me at the moment”. This was a false...

7. [2022] NZIACDT 27 - ZK v Li (8 November 2022) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...[11] On 15 October 2018, Ms X sent an email to the complainant (copied to Mr Li) setting out the process and documents needed for an expression of interest (expression) and then the residence visa application. [12] This led to an exchange of emails and information between Ms X and the complainant, as the information and documents necessary for the expression and visa application were compiled. Such emails continued through November 2018 until January 2019. Some of them were copi...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 144 Jerard v Wildbore [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...request on Ms Jerard and I understand through the Registrar that Ms Coulston did so. The Registrar then made repeated efforts to contact Ms Jerard to ascertain her response to Ms Coulston’s application and her intentions regarding the proceeding. Emails were sent to Ms Jerard on 23 April, 29 May and 4 June 2013. The Registrar eventually spoke with Ms Jerard by telephone on 4 June 2103 and sent the email again to an alternative address provided by her. When there was no respons...

9. DY v WB LCRO 27 / 2010 (12 July 2011) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...for a review of this decision by the LCRO must be made within 30 working days after the date of this decision. An application for review must be on the prescribed form and accompanied by the prescribed fee of $30.67. The LCRO may be contacted by email: lcro@justice.govt.nz; Telephone: 0800 367 6838; Post: Private Bag 92020, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142. web: www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/legal-complaints-review-officer/contact-us” [4] On 31 December 2010, the Applicant s...

10. 2017 NZSSAA 011 (31 March 2017) [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...2015. The report states that the decision under review was made on 27 November 2014 which was the date on which the Ministry sent Ms XXXX a full breakdown of her debt for the period August 1996- June 2014.3 [9] The report to the BRC cites an email from Mr Howell dated 2 December 2014 as containing the appellant’s case. In its s 12K report the Ministry 1 Submissions of G Howell dated 6 March 2017 at [6]; s 12K report at [3.4]. 2 Submis...