Search Results

1. Witana v Tau - Omapere Taraire E (2019) 191 Taitokerau MB 1 (191 TTK 1) [pdf, 535 KB]

   ...15 TNTOK 44. 7 Affidavit of T Wihongi, sworn 5 July 2018, exhibit A, schedule 5. assessed compensation at $10,108.00. The valuation obtained by Top Energy assessed compensation at $20,000.00. [27] On 28 September 2017, Mr Tau sent an email to the other trustees. That email set out the background to the negotiations and advised that Top Energy had agreed to pay compensation at the higher valuation of $20,000.00. The email attached a copy of the draft easement and the Top...

2. LCRO 86/2022 PR v KG and VW (12 November 2024) [pdf, 499 KB]

   ...Representation (just copy KG’s one) and represent yourself. Since I am no longer your lawyer, I have finished my work for you and my account is now due and owing. 1 Mrs PR maintained she was an employee and not an independent contractor. 2 Email KG to PR (19 September 2018). 4 You owe me $68,121.40 for all matters to date … Probably the best way to handle it is to offset this amount from what I owe you and ER thereby now leaving a balance of $49,984.29 owing. [2...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 117 Underhill v Coca-Cola Amatil NZ Ltd [pdf, 429 KB]

   ...Coca-Cola and the Underhills in March and April 2016. Coca-Cola claimed: (a) During the days when Kane and Tyrone Underhill were performing their vending filling services, they could not be contacted. Telephone calls were not answered. Voicemail messages left were not answered. Emails were not replied to. Text messages were not answered. (b) There were complaints from customers about the stocking of vending machines. The attempts to contact both Kane and Tyrone par...

4. [2021] NZREADT 55 – Lammas v Real Estate Agents Authority (6 December 2021) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...with the Freears being the named licensees. The agency commenced on that day and would expire on 7 July 2019. At the time the agreement was signed, the Freears did not have with them the REAA guide for buyers and sellers. [6] Mr Freear sent an email to Mr Lammas that evening at 9:02 pm attaching: 1. The signed agency agreement 3 2. The REAA guide. [7] The eventual purchasers of the property were introduced by the Freears and inspected the property three times from abou...

5. LCRO 64/2018 IG v PC (1 August 2018) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...indicated a willingness to attend mediation; Mr IR did not. [36] The complaint was then referred to a different Standards Committee for determination. Mr IR’s responses [37] Mr IR provided several responses to Mr PC’s complaint. [38] In his email to the Complaints Service dated 9 May 2017, Mr IR said that “it was clearly understood by all parties ([Mr PC and Mr E]) that I will not be liable for [Mr PC’s] fees”. And the all charges will be between them “man to man” [...

6. LCRO 42/2022 QA v Kennelly (19 April 2023) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...him the proposed document before GA signed it. Later in the week,4 Mr QA telephoned Mr Kennelly to find out what was happening and ascertained that GA had an appointment to meet with Mr Kennelly at 4 pm that day. 2 QA complaint at [1.2]. 3 Email Kennelly to YN (28 August 2017). 4 Mr QA’s timeline is dated Thursday, August 31, [country] time. 3 [14] Ms YN provided the document to Mr Kennelly on 30 August 2017. In the accompanying email, Ms YN said: Is this o.k?. Ca...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Arman [2020] NZLCDT 17 (22 June 2020) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...requisite standard? 3. If not, are there breaches which lead to a finding of unsatisfactory conduct? 4. What is the proportionate response by way of penalty which will meet the purposes of the LCA? Process [4] The proceedings were served by email and the affidavit of service states that none of the emails returned as “undelivered". The email address used was that with which Mr Arman had corresponded with this Tribunal in previous proceedings. 1 Section 241(1)(c) Lawye...

8. National Standards Committee 1 v Palmer [2022] NZLCDT 42 (10 November 2022) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...and dishonourable conduct, as viewed by lawyers of good standing. [48] Therefore, we find that the level of culpability of misconduct has been reached in respect of this charge also. Charge 2 [49] Charge 2 relates to a lengthy series of emails which took place between May and July 2017. In the course of this email chain, Mr Palmer made numerous requests to a first-year solicitor, to have coffee with him and subsequently sought to persuade 10 her to have dinner with...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 217 MGK Homes Ltd v Yoon [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...difficult. [11] On 20 April 2020, Astoria posted an advertisement in the New Zealand Korean Post for three positions: a construction-related graduate, a quantity surveyor and an administrator. Applicants were invited to apply to an MGK and Astoria email address. [12] On 22 April 2020, in email correspondence between Shawn Lee, a manager working within both MGK and Astoria, and Ms Yoon, Shawn Lee raised the issue of the incorrect bank details. Ms Yoon explained what had ha...

10. OIA-124050.pdf [pdf, 5.3 MB]

    ...Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 8 September 2025 Our ref: OIA 124050 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Communications with the Free Speech Union Thank you for your email of 23 July 2025, requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Free Speech Union (FSU). Specifically, you requested: All information held by your agencies relating to communications, interacti...