Search Results

1. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Redactions) [2019] NZHRRT 53 [pdf, 158 KB]

   1 (1) PERMANENT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF REDACTIONS MADE TO EMAILS DATED 15 APRIL 2016 AND 18 APRIL 2016 (2) PERMANENT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS AND ANY OTHER IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF SERVICE USERS OTHER THAN PLAINTIFF (3) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 53 Reference No. HRRT 029/2018 UNDER T...

2. [2025] NZEmpC 24 Cunningham v healthAlliance NZ [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...Regulations 2000, Mr Cunningham has served a notice requiring disclosure on the defendant, healthAlliance NZ Ltd. The notice requiring disclosure sought all personal information held by healthAlliance from 1 March 2019 until 17 July 2020 in the form of emails to which Mr Cunningham was not a party but where one of three individuals was either the sender or recipient. [3] healthAlliance did not object to the notice requiring disclosure and has provided documents to Mr Cunningham....

3. [2014] NZEmpC 153 Roy v BOT of Tamaki College [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...filed on 21 May 2014), he alleges variously that he was “employed … until September 2010”, that he was “constructively dismissed on 27 September 2010” and that “his resignation came into force on Monday 11 th October 2010”. In his emailed letter to the Principal of the school on 24 January 2011 Mr Roy wrote that he had “resigned in September …”. [7] Even taking the last of these dates (11 October 2010) as that on which Mr Roy’s 90 days within which to raise...

4. AN v TC LCRO 381/2013 (4 August 2015) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...to draft a relationship property agreement for the purposes of s 21(a) of the Property Relationships Act 1976 (PRA). [3] After his 15 May email, Mr AN continued applying pressure on Mr TC to generate a draft agreement until, on 23 May 2013, he emailed Mr TC saying: Hello Mr TC Sorry, as I clearly advised you earlier, you have run out of time. I still need time to check and approve the section 21A Agreement, and on the basis of earlier documentation you have provided for other c...

5. Tucker v Real Estate Agents Authority [2020] NZHRRT 50 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...Tucker v Real Estate Agents Authority [2017] NZHC 1894. [3] That backdrop provides the context for Mr Tucker’s claim to this Tribunal under the Privacy Act 1993. [4] Anticipating an adverse decision by the READT, on 20 September 2016 Mr Tucker emailed the Real Estate Agents Authority (REAA) requesting all information it held about him under the Privacy Act and the Official Information Act 1982. [5] On 22 September 2016 the REAA acknowledged receipt of Mr Tucker’s Privacy Act...

6. LCRO 136/2021 YL v OB (28 February 2022) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...arrangements that had been agreed post separation. [13] Ms YL turned her attention to filing an application for a protection order. Ms YL was particularly concerned that immediately following separation, Mr EH had bombarded her with a number of emails and uninvited gifts. The emails were sexual in nature, unwanted by Ms YL, and considered by her to be harassing in their nature. [14] On 10 February 2021, Ms YH provided Mr OB with a folder containing the offending emails from Mr EH....

7. LCRO 107/2021 NG v WF and OE (29 September 2021) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...estate. [7] On 29 June 2020, [B] lodged a caveat challenging a grant of probate to his late mother’s will. [8] A hearing as to that caveat was scheduled for 22 March 2021, in the High Court at Auckland. [9] On 6 November 2020 [B]’s lawyers emailed a settlement proposal to Mr WF (the settlement proposal), which included withdrawal of the caveat. [10] The settlement proposal was also emailed to Ms OE, although she was not involved in the administration of the late Mrs NG’s e...

8. CJ v XL LCRO 221 / 2010 (1 July 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...inspection of the goods to avoid this fact being discovered. [14] Subsequently, as the dispute progressed towards Trial, all briefs of evidence referred to the fact that 7/8 of the stock had been sold, and the matter proceeded on that basis. The emails [15] The second aspect of the Respondent’s conduct about which the Applicant complains, relates to the evidence that was produced at the Trial. [16] On 13 September 2007 at 4.01 p.m., the Applicant had written by email to Mr...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 80 Tribe v John Scott & Co Ltd [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...that it was the former. 1 Mrs Tribe contends for the latter, challenging the Authority’s determination on a de novo basis. [2] Resolution of the challenge essentially boils down to two communications between the parties. The first is an email in which Mrs Tribe advised that she was confronting imminent major surgery and that she wished to discuss a finish date. The second is the discussion which followed. 1 Tribe v J Scott...

10. Dickinson v The Registrar of the Real Estate Agents Authority [2018] NZREADT 31 [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...Dickinson and his family left New Zealand to live in South Korea.2 He did not suspend his licence, advise the Registrar of his absence from New Zealand, or amend the contact details provided to the Authority. He arranged with the Agency for work emails to be forwarded to a colleague who had his contact details in South Korea. [8] Shortly after arriving in South Korea Mr Dickinson removed the New Zealand SIM card from his cellphone and replaced it with a South Korean one. [9] On...