Search Results

1. Reihana-Ngatote - Okahu 1, 3B2B2A, 3B2B2C, 3B2B2D, 4A, 4B, 4D, 4C1, 4C2, 3A3B2A (2016) 132 Taitokerau MB 120 (132 TTK 120) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...trustee, her father and their whānau trust, the Nicholas George Te Paa Whānau Trust (“the Whanau Trust”). She says that Mr Mahoney in particular indicated that he was not prepared to engage with her or the Whānau Trust. She refers to various emails in this regard. [17] I have reviewed the email correspondence. I sense that the email traffic was increased by the failure of the responsible trustees to meet, either on their own or with the advisory trustees. The advisory tru...

2. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Ms A [2022] NZLCDT 51 (22 December 2022) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...background, Ms A’s client sent her a draft message in Mandarin. It comprised a statement he might make to Immigration New Zealand to suggest his wife had lied in her application to get permanent residence. On 6 July 2020 at 1.13am, Ms A sent an email to the wife’s solicitor in these terms: Please see the below my client’s proposed letter to Immigration NZ, I will suggest your client to negotiate with our client to resolve the matter in an amicable way. If we do not hear from...

3. LCRO 84/2024 XA v MQ (25 February 2025) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...from the Complaints Service, nothing was received from Mr XA. [26] On 7 December 2023, the Committee required Mr XA7 to produce his files relating to the matters which were the subject of Mrs MQ’s complaints. [27] Mr XA responded to reminder emails on 25 January 2024, advising that he had closed his practice. He did not provide his files. [28] Mr XA again asked for copies of correspondence between himself and the Complaints Service. [29] The Committee replied, pointing ou...

4. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Slater [2019] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 717 KB]

   ...be determined by the Tribunal. [19] We begin with a brief summary of Mr Blomfield’s evidence. The evidence of Mr Blomfield [20] Mr Blomfield is a self-employed consultant. Over a ten year period he used a hard drive to back up his business emails, documents and other personal information. Without his authority that hard drive came into the possession of Mr Slater in or before May 2012 and it was from this hard drive that Mr Slater obtained the personal information about Mr Blomfi...

5. LCRO 9/2024 & 12/2024 QB v WF and SY & WF and SY v QB (27 June 2024) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...than for Ms X’s initial query, which was about constructive dismissal. [9] On the employer formally tabled a proposal that involved the disestablishment of the respondents’ roles. The respondents responded to it. [10] On Mr Y sent an email to the applicant signalling the respondents’ expectation that: … there won’t be viable alternatives for either of us and I think we need to be able to depart taking our four weeks notice with payment of salary in lieu. To this end...

6. UB v OZ LCRO 11 / 2012 (11 October 2012) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...substantially challenged the processes that were being followed, or expressed her dissatisfaction, even though her frustrations about the process became more apparent as time went on. I have not 7 overlooked the clear messages in the Applicant emails which clearly signalled her desire to get on with terminating the franchises (particularly in the February emails), but there is also evidence that she was prepared to be guided by the Practitioner. [28] A pivotal timeframe ap...

7. Mihaka v Housing New Zealand Corporation (Recusal Application) [2017] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...Shaw for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 2 March 2017 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL DISMISSING RECUSAL APPLICATION 1 BACKGROUND [1] The hearing of this case will resume on 3 and 4 April 2017. By email dated Sunday 19 February 2017 Mr Mihaka has applied for the recusal of Hon KL Shirley, a member of the Tribunal convened to hear this case and who participated in the hearing on 3 August 2016. In this decision we explain our reasons for di...

8. Holmqvist v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Coma [2017] NZREADT 15 [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...attendees are not commonly taken. The Committee found that the second respondent and the Agency could not be faulted for not taking a list. [k] Failed to advise the appellants that he was going on holiday: The Committee noted that while an email received by the appellants on 23 December 2014 advised that the second respondent would be on holiday until 12 January, it also advised that he would react to any phone calls. The Committee found that the appellants were unreasonable to...

9. I Ltd v BW [2022] NZDT 246 (6 December 2022) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...that time was a family law practitioner based in [City 2]. 6. On 12 March 2019, I LTD sent BW an invoice for $1,366.20 for attendances on 19-22 January and on 8 March. 7. HX ceased her involvement with this matter on 10 May 2019 stating in an email to I LTD “I am unable to take on any new work at this stage or progress some matters, including BW’s”. HX was appointed as a [Redacted]. 8. BW contacted UI on 12 May and 13 May about recent developments. 9. BW wanted a...

10. IACDT - Section 54 Appeal form [pdf, 74 KB]

    ...Contact Details Please fill in ALL fields with your contact details: Surname(s) First name(s) Company name (if applicable) Occupation Address for service Street Suburb City/town Post code Country Daytime contact phone number Mobile Email address Part 2B Representative’s Contact Details (if applicable) You are entitled to represent yourself or have a lawyer represent you. You need leave of the Tribunal to have a non-lawyer representative appear on your behalf; leave...