Search Results

1. Nile Mosley v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) & Cooper & Co Real Estate Limited t/a Harcourts Cooper & Co [2017] NZREADT 62 [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...wiring. The Agency advised Mr Mosley on 8 April that the electrician had disconnected lights and that the contractor was attending to the rat infestation. [9] Of particular relevance to this appeal are the following: [a] On 9 April, Mr Mosley emailed the Agency: Actually, if the cylinder has been rewired and is working, and if the rat problem in the shed is being attended to, and the noise in the top bedroom is coming from birds, then really there is no reason why the tenan...

2. Guo v PwC (Further Discovery) [2022] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...order. That application has been heard and dismissed. Pleadings – the statement of reply [18] The key responses made by PwC in their statement of reply dated 2 June 2016 are: [18.1] PwC complied with its obligations under PA 1993, s 40. By email dated 25 September 2015 Ms Guo was advised by PwC it intended complying with her request subject to the statutory exceptions allowed by the Act. [18.2] On 2 October 2015 PwC provided Ms Guo with a complete duplicate copy of her full pers...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 56 Urban Décor Ltd v Yu [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...any correspondence between the employees or their representative prior to statements of problem being lodged in the Authority. However, on the third day of the investigation meeting, Mr Young, the defendants’ then-representative, produced an email dated 12 December 2019 which had been sent to the company. [20] The letter has the subject line “personal grievance”. In the investigation meeting Mr Han accepted he may have received it. It reads: personal grievance [Email ad...

4. Williamson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of Entitlements) [2023] NZACC 002 [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...because of recent assessments from Drs Anderson and Johnson, which indicated that he had ongoing failure to control his pain and other symptoms and he thought that an assessment would be “premature and inappropriate”. [15] ACC replied by email on 7 February 2018, saying that he was at risk of losing payment of his weekly compensation if he refused to attend the initial medical assessment. [16] Mr Williamson responded by letter on 9 February 2018 saying: … Please note th...

5. Takamore v Tawhara - Waioeka Papakāinga 25 [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 436 [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...that the appellants had notice of the hearing.6 That is, they had been afforded the right to attend the hearing and be heard. Upon learning that it was Judge Wara presiding over the application, the appellants requested that she recuse herself by email dated 4 December 2024. On the same date the appellants sent a letter of objection to the trustee appointments of Renay Jones and Victoria Upward-Ngaika. [22] In response the case manager advised by email dated 5 December 2024 that s...

6. LCRO 136/2017 RAI and SEM v EYR, IPA and DYN (26 November 2018) [pdf, 333 KB]

   ...relation to J and Ms RAI instructed Ms DYN to write to Ms JOP after they had discussed three options: (a) Ms RAI write to Ms JOP; (b) [CL] write to Ms JOP; or (c) File an application in the Family Court. [11] On 22 January 2014 Ms DYN sent an email to Ms RAI expressing the preliminary view that Ms JOP was not currently a guardian for J. Ms DYN’s view, 3 however, was that if Ms JOP were to apply for orders, she would have “pretty good prospects of succeeding in being app...

7. LCRO 149/2023 HV v BQ (2 April 2024) [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...applicant was one of the two main lawyers with whom CRSL had a referral relationship. In August 2016, CRSL provided the respondent with website links to the two lawyers and recommended she select one of them to represent her. [17] There was then email correspondence between the respondent and a CRSL representative about the respondent’s assessment of the two recommended lawyers, based on the information made available by CRSL and the respondent’s perusal of news media reports she fo...

8. UR v OH LCRO 20 / 2013 (2 April 2013) [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...lawyers. One was the above Respondent. On [2013] the Applicant filed an application for review of each of those determinations. [2] Counsel for the Respondent contends that the Standards Committee decision was made available to the Applicant via email on [2012] (that is, the same day that the decision was made), and further contends that the Applicant’s application for review was not lodged within the 30 working day timeframe required under s 198 of the Lawyers and Conveyanc...

9. [2010] NZEMPC 144 Gilbert v Transfield Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...telephone conference call with the Authority Member, at which a preliminary investigation on the issue of interim reinstatement was set down for Monday 11 January 2010, he requested that all documents be served on both Mr Gilbert and himself by email. He explained that this was important as Mr Gilbert was the applicant in the proceedings and Mr Yukich was away from his office for periods of up to a month at a time, in particular in the summer months when he was on leave. He deposed...

10. Maori Reservations.pdf [pdf, 348 KB]

    ...follow or go online to maorilandcourt.govt.nz/ contact‑us Contact the Māori Land Court The DX number is the postal address. Taitokerau District Level 3, Manaia House Rathbone Street, Whangārei 0110 DX Box AX10086, Whangārei Phone 09 983 9940 Email mlctaitokerau@justice.govt.nz Auckland Information Office Ground floor, Building B 65B Main Highway, Ellerslie Auckland 1051 DX Box EX10912, Auckland Phone 09 279 5850 Email mlctamakimakaurau@justice.govt.nz Waikato- Maniapoto Distric...