Search Results

1. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx Terra Nova Planning Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...subdivision within the donor site). (e) Such further or consequential relief as may be necessary to address the matters raised in Terra Nova Planning’s submissions and this appeal; and 9. An electronic copy of this notice is being served today by email on the Auckland Council at unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. *[A copy of the notice is also being served on the Minister of Conservation.] Waivers and directions have been made by the Environment Court in relation to the usu...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 112 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 431 KB]

   RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED v THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 [31 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 EMPC 265/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC First Defendant AND E TU INC (FORMERLY THE SERVICE & FOOD WOR

3. 2014-Environment-Court-Practice-Note.pdf [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...that they have an opportunity to explain or comment upon the information concerned before the case is determined. 6.5 Release of decisions (a) The Court’s decisions are forwarded to all parties at the same time – by mailed hard copy, by email, or both. Copies are not released to the media until, usually, three working days after release to the parties. This allows the parties to read and consider the decision before it becomes public knowledge. Once the Court forwards the...

4. Practice Note 2014 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...that they have an opportunity to explain or comment upon the information concerned before the case is determined. 6.5 Release of decisions (a) The Court’s decisions are forwarded to all parties at the same time – by mailed hard copy, by email, or both. Copies are not released to the media until, usually, three working days after release to the parties. This allows the parties to read and consider the decision before it becomes public knowledge. Once the Court forwards the...

5. LCRO 275/2015 and 9/2016 YM v SC and JW (18 December 2018) [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...to them to pursue complaint against individually named partners in [Firm 1] (not just Mr YM) if they had wished to do so. [29] In identifying the outcome sought, Mr SC said that he required a “large refund”. [30] On 10 September 2014, NZLS emailed Mr SC advising that his issues of complaint “were not entirely clear” and seeking clarification as to whether the complaint was solely about fees, or whether he had other issues of concern. [31] On 17 September 2014, Mrs SC emailed...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 178 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Co Ltd [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...received confirmation JDE would “go live” in this work area on 1 October 2016. That date was a Saturday, so he treated the effective date for the software to be operative as the following Monday, 3 October 2016. On that day he received another email confirming that the software was operative. [11] At the time JDE was declared to be operative, Mr Johnston was waiting to be appointed to a new position. In July 2016 he had successfully applied for the new role of Business Perfo...

7. [2021] NZACC 176 - Renton v ACC (5 November 2021) [pdf, 728 KB]

   ...these proceedings, or indeed any proceedings involving treatment injury. [85] Mr Hunt next refers to a judgment of Judge Powell dated 29 April 2016. In it Judge Powell says: [2] On 3 February 2016 Mr Sara, as solicitor for the appellant, emailed the registry and advised: My instructions are to withdraw the current appeal and to relodge an application for cover under the current legislation. The appeal is withdrawn accordingly. Please acknowledge receipt. [86] After con...

8. LCRO 91/2019 CL v BK and AM (31 August 2021) [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...plumbing job”. 3 [11] He then informed (by letter) the vendor’s lawyer that day that the solicitor’s approval condition was “satisfied”, and he would “advise” as to the insurance condition “tomorrow”. He also received (by email) from Ms CL’s insurer an insurance policy schedule for the property which noted the bank’s interest in respect of a bank loan arranged by Ms CL. [12] Mr BK spoke with Ms CL again on 24 September 2013 and file noted “held insuran...

9. J v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2022] CEIT-2019-0068 [pdf, 530 KB]

   ...J. Evidence of ejecta [65] Ejecta was noted: (a) on 21 August 2014, by HFC in the construction join beneath the hallway to the north of the bathroom (On the C-D line on figure 1); (b) by Mr Ayton after carpets were lifted, recorded in an email sent to Hawkins on 15 July 2015; (c) on 23 July 2015, when the Hawkins Rebuild Solutions Manager sent a photo which shows a grey powdery substance beside the sawcut in the kitchen (A on figure 1); (d) on 6 August 2015, in an email...

10. [2022] NZEnvC 150 Hamilton Homezone Limited v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 26 MB]

    ...of the full suite of consent conditions, the CMP shall include but not be limited to: (a) Contact details of the contractor’s site supervisor or project manager and the Consent Holder’s Project Liaison Coordinator (phone, postal address, email address) responsible for receiving, addressing and monitoring queries and responding and remedying complaints in relation to the construction works; (b) Construction timetable and hours of operation; (c) Confirmation of the constructi...