Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 243 Ngāti Kuku Hapū v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 794 KB]

   ...under Part 3 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Tukutai Moana) Act 2011. 3 Notification and reporting required by this consent should be made in writing to the Manager Regulatory Compliance, Bay of Plenty Regional Council, PO Box 364, Whakatane 3158 or email notify@boprc.govt.nz and should include the consent number RM20-0629. 4 The consent holder is responsible for ensuring that all contractors mailto:notify@boprc.govt.nz carrying out works under this consent are made aware of...

2. MacDonald v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury/Costs on Review) [2023] NZACC 175 [pdf, 339 KB]

   ...explained to Ms Koloni that evidence to support Mr MacDonald’s application for a review was required. (c) No written submissions or medical evidence was provided prior to the hearing. However, Ms Koloni did enter into extensive derogatory email correspondence with ACC’s representative, Mr Lister. (d) For costs to be awarded, I need to be persuaded that an applicant has acted reasonably in mounting a review notwithstanding that they have been unsuccessful in the review out...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 287 Port Taranaki Limited v New Plymouth District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...excused from mediation. OMV New Zealand Limited and Taranaki Energy Watch are also section 274 parties. They were granted leave to be excused from attending mediation. Those parties did not sign the consent memorandum dated 27 September 2024. By email dated 11 October 2024, those parties were given a final opportunity to confirm their position on the consent documentation. OMV New Zealand Limited confirmed it has no interest in the matters addressed in the consent documentation. The...

4. 2025 NZSSAA 01 [pdf, 338 KB]

   ...Ministry is to provide any response within ten working days of receipt of any cost information filed for Ms XXXX. 42 Social Security Regulations 2018, reg 255. 19 (c) The parties may seek to vary the timetable by agreement by email addressed to the case manager. Dated at Wellington this 10th day of January 2025 ___________________ R. Palu Chairperson ___________________ T Tran Deputy Chairperson ___________________ B Johnstone Member...

5. Cribb - Succession to Tieme Karepe, Te One Karepe, Hoani Karepe and Porokuru Te Kiwi [2025] Chief Judge's MB 373 (2025 CJ 373) [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...1/36 1/36 1/36 1/36 1/36 1/36 Identification of evidence that may be of assistance in remedying the mistake or omission 15. The applicant has provided the following documents in support of this section 45 application: (a) Email document setting out critical statements of the applicant and the Karepe/Cribb whānau land blocks for succession. Received 28 March 2024. (b) Additional research document on descendants of Te One John Hoani Karepe. Received 8 June 20...

6. [2024] NZEmpC 250 High Performance Sport New Zealand Ltd v The Athletes Cooperative Inc [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...Cooperative Inc v High Performance Sport New Zealand Ltd, above n 1, at [62]. [34] At the second meeting, TAC made a proposal for a collective agreement by tabling a draft document for HPSNZ’s consideration and response. [35] In an email dated 5 April 2024, HPSNZ declined to respond to the draft on the basis that “both sides have acknowledged that athletes are not employees, and HPSNZ has made it clear that it has no intention of employing athletes in the future”. It...

7. FINAL_FLS_Lawyer-for-Child-Best_practice_guidelines_29.4.24.02.pdf [pdf, 432 KB]

   ...school. (iv) In some cases, the Court will accept a written statement from the school being admitted into evidence by consent without needing the teacher to be called in court. Schools should be aware that any evidence provided (even as a letter or email) may mean that a teacher is required to give evidence. (v) It is preferable that evidence about a child is provided from the primary source (i.e. the class teacher rather than the Principal) and that the evidence is limited to matters...

8. Biester v Kingi - Te Ti B Part being Lot 17 DP 61631 (2025) 296 Taitokerau MB 177 (296 TTK 177) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...original Pae Tukutuku went on extended leave, the Registrar should have sufficient systems in place to ensure that files do not fall into an abyss in such circumstances. The fact that there was such a prolonged delay here, in spite of my numerous emails to the Registrar, is inexcusable. All parties are entitled to the prompt and efficient administration of their proceedings in this Court. Clearly, that has not happened in this case. He aha ngā mauhanga e whakaatu ana? What do th...

9. Court-User-Survey-2025-results.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...a hearing were also asked if they knew how that would take place before arriving. 69% of respondents said they did. Respondents were asked to rate the information they received about court. Most respondents received this information in a letter, email, or phone call. • 84% said it was easy to understand • 83% said it was helpful o Among those in criminal proceedings, 77% said it was helpful • 67% said it explained what a person needed to do in their hearing • 69% said it e...

10. [2017] NZEnvC 162 Mawhinney v Auckland Council [pdf, 24 MB]

    ...objection31 to the return of the applications including objections to the further reasons contended by the consent authority in its letter dated 5 March 2012. This was received by the Council on 29 March 2012. [43] On 27 April 2012 Mr Mawhinney emailed32 Mr C D McKinney at Auckland Council as follows: 30 31 32 Asserted by D C McKinney in his evidence-in-chief 6 July 2017 at [5] [Environment Court (201 6) document 16]. P W Mawhinney 1 s l affidavit dated 16 June 2015, Exhibit...