Search Results

1. 2017 NZEnvC-121 Auckland Council [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...of any Notice of Appeal with the Court. (iv) A direction that any Notice of Appeal be filed within 30 working days of the date of these directions. (v) A direction that any Notice of Appeal be served on the Auckland Council electronically by email tounitaryplan@aucklandcoucnil.govt.nz. (b) Section 274 notices (i) A waiver of the usual requirement to lodge a signed original and one copy of any s 274 notice with the Court, and a direction instead that anyone seeking to join the...

2. ET & ETT v UG Ltd & UGG [2016] NZDT 962 (13 July 2016) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...entitled to a refund of 50% of the remaining days’ charter fee. If so, what is the correct calculation of a refund? [12] UG Ltd has referred to prices quoted in September to Mr ET and Mrs ETT in response to an online enquiry from them. The email, dated 10 September 2015 says ‘The cost is $850.00 per 24-hour day for the first 7 days=$5950. The cost for 10 days is $7905.00.’ Mr ET and Mrs ETT says they have never received that email from UG LTD. [13] The contract p...

3. Kaupapa-Inquiry-Claimant-Form-Tuapapa-Events-Editable-v6.pdf [pdf, 427 KB]

   ...required before the claim will be assessed and processed for payment.  Please supply copies of any evidence as originals will not be returned. Need help? If you have any questions about this form or what you can claim for, please contact us by email claimantfunding@justice.govt.nz, call 0800 268 787 and tell them you want travel support for a kaupapa inquiry event, or text 027 361 2236 (we can call you back) We can make and pay for travel and accommodation bookings for you...

4. 2025-August-FV-Provider-Update.pdf [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...incorporated this year’s updates. If you have any questions on the changes, please reach out to your contract manager. FVPP Forms We understand that navigating the forms can sometimes cause confusion and have some reminders to assist. • Emailing forms - When sending client forms to DVprogrammes: - please format the subject line - FORM – NAME – CASE # - and ensure that you create a separate email for each client. • FVPP05 - Please provide reasoning in your comments...

5. Notes on High Court Appeal Process May 2019 [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...address for service of the appellant is [physical address]. Documents for service on the appellant may be left at this address for service or may be: (a) posted to [postal Address]; or (b) left at a document exchange for direction [Address], (c) emailed to [email address]. 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CIV-201 WELLINGTON REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE IN THE MATTER OF An appeal by way of Case Stated from the determ...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 155 George Weston Foods (NZ) Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...disclosure. In that context, George Weston has redacted two documents provided to First Union. [4] First Union challenges George Weston’s redactions, and this judgment resolves that challenge. [5] The two documents in issue are: (a) An email dated Wednesday 24 July 2019 at 1.33 pm. The recipients and senders of that email are not solicitors, but George Weston claims privilege, as it says the email was sent internally for the purpose of instructing Kensington Swan, and incl...

7. [2020] NZREADT 01 - Leith v CAC 1903 & Cobham - Ruling (24 January 2020) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...[12] Ms Leith seeks leave to submit her cell phone log for September 2016. She also seeks leave to submit an email thread between Ms Cobham and herself, and including correspondence with her solicitor, a valuer, insurers, and her bank. Some of the emails are included in the Bundle of Documents. Discussion [13] The Tribunal is not required to give leave for any material that Ms Leith provided to the Committee to be submitted for consideration on appeal. The Tribunal will conside...

8. LT v NL [2022] NZDT 13 (5 May 2022) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...it was to be returned; has not been returned; and her claim is not out of time. This is not an onerous burden, she need only prove this on the balance of probabilities. Did NL receive $30,000 that he has not returned? 5. There are numerous emails in September 2017 and in 2020 between the parties in which NL said he would return money, but if he did it would prevent him from building the hangar. He says this was either in reference to money LT was to receive from [redacted] or puf...

9. ZG Ltd v C Ltd [2019] NZDT 1506 (12 September 2019) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...including provision of specific information and documents. On Monday 22 January, ZG could not contact Mr WS’s employer due to [public holiday], but paid out the loan anyway based on the income shown in WS’s bank statements. 3. The next day, ZG then emailed C Ltd as follows: “I’ve just spoken with customer’s employer. They advised that WS they he left and come back (which is fine), but they advised this was due to him sorting out his Visa. The application shows customer as a...

10. T Ltd v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 322 (1 September 2023) [pdf, 241 KB]

    ...Liquidator about her own claim. 4. In late September 2022, SB was approached by NJ, an employee of B Ltd, about the homeowner’s claims. SB says that she was asked to prepare reports on building defects and uncompleted work. 5. On 3 October 2022, SB emailed NJ advising that the reports would take some time to compile, and asked “[i]s this something we can put with my claim to compensate for the hours spent on it?” NJ responded “[p]lease can you keep track of your hours separ...