Search Results

1. Humphries v CAC 10070 & Anor [2013] NZREADT 103 [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...$19,500 GST) on Unit 1714 settlement. After receiving the Decision of Complaints Assessment Committee dated 26 June 2012, I claimed the $19,500 GST back in October 2012 (for the GST period April to September 2012). However, I had to send secure emails to IRD explaining the reason for the refund claim. I also paid my tax agent accounting fees for this claim.” [29] In his oral evidence to us, the complainant emphasised that he had claimed and received a GST input from the IRD. He...

2. ENVC Hearing 27Jul15 WML suppl rebuttal Maxwell Dunn [pdf, 962 KB]

   ...Text Revisions AutoCAD SHX Text CLIENT: AutoCAD SHX Text International Marina AutoCAD SHX Text Consultants to the Marina Industry. AutoCAD SHX Text A.C.N. 079 905 481 AutoCAD SHX Text Phone (07)3892 5711 Fax (07)3892 5611 AutoCAD SHX Text Email : imc@imc-marinas.com AutoCAD SHX Text 473 Annerley Road AutoCAD SHX Text ANNERLEY QLD 4103 AutoCAD SHX Text AUSTRALIA AutoCAD SHX Text Consultants Pty. Ltd. AutoCAD SHX Text Designed By: AutoCAD SHX Text TITLE: AutoCAD SHX Text Drawn B...

3. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...serious issues involving the right to free speech and to freely work as a lawyer which I feel have been breached and that warrant your attention. The judiciary is free from attack, but also must not engage in attacks on counsel. [12] In an earlier email dated 25 May 2010 to Mr Graeme Pitt (copied to Ms Olivier) Mr Deliu asserts: What Justice Randerson has done is in my submission far more egregious than the worst judicial scandal in New Zealand history ... In my view, this brings seri...

4. Rafiq v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2012] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...witnesses, counsel and the Tribunal all his proceedings will be at risk of being dismissed under s 115 of the Human Rights Act 1993 on the grounds that they are vexatious or not brought in good faith. [16] In this regard it is noted that Mr Rafiq, by email dated 20 December 2011 to the Case Manager, has copied a letter he (Mr Rafiq) addressed to an officer of the Privacy Commissioner which is in the following terms: Re your Immediate Expulsion from my matters It has come to my attenti...

5. Summary of submissions: Regulations to give effect to the new alcohol laws [pdf, 591 KB]

   ...– 9 submissions hospitality stakeholders (individuals and representative bodies) – 6 submissions retail stakeholders (individuals and representative bodies) – 7 submissions other1 – 13 submissions. 6. Submissions ranged from brief emails on specific issues to comprehensive documents containing question-by-question responses to the matters raised in the consultation document. 7. In the public meetings we sought feedback on the options, proposals, and questions in the con...

6. O'Reilly v CAC301 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 15 [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...requirements for registration were at that time and inadvertently failed to do so: [d] The Incorporated Societies Office also acknowledged that: [i] Further attempts at registration of the 2012 Rules in July 2013 had been hampered by failures in email transmissions and by the 2012 rules and coversheet, which Mrs Buchanan had sent, being lost in the post. [ii] While it considered that the alterations originally recorded in the AGM minutes would not have legal effect for registration...

7. Wolverhampton v Shaftesbury LCRO 145 / 2009 (23 June 2010) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...She expressed her concerns about the contact between S and the Practitioner, of which she had been unaware. She said she had learned that S‟s current lawyer had sought S‟s permission to contact the Practitioner (enclosed was a copy of an emailed request by that lawyer to the Practitioner), and also expressed her concern about the propriety of the contact between S‟s lawyer and the Practitioner since 8 August 2009. [34] The Applicant queried the timing and convenience of th...

8. NH v Singh LCRO 53/2013, 91/2013 and 115/2013 (27 August 2014) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...and Mr Singh’s trusteeship of HIJ. The Committee considered there was a clear possibility that the interests of Mr Singh conflicted with those of Mr and Mrs NH. The conflict was particularly evident, the Committee considered, when Mr Singh emailed Mr NH in terms that strongly suggested he was assisting the lender, or trying to protect the lender’s interests, and when he persuaded Mr NH to agree to QRS taking a registered security over property owned by Mrs NH and the company o...

9. 2011 to 2014 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...resolved in less than one and a half hours, with very few incidents outside of the target 24 Contact details Ministry of Justice The Vogel Centre 19 Aitken Street SX10088 Wellington 6140 Phone: (04) 918 8800 Fax: (04) 918 8820 Email: planning&reporting@justice.govt.nz Website: www.justice.govt.nz – 2011 © Crown Copyright ISSN 1175-8414 (print) • ISSN 1178-6914 (online)

10. Colmore v ACC 2014 NZACA 19 [pdf, 82 KB]

    ...since December 1980 and that there was no fresh incapacity in March 1990 when he left Social Welfare. He points out that there is evidence Mr Colmore’s previous representative accepted there was continuous incapacity (see his representative’s email of 22 November 2010). [65] Judge Beattie agreed with Mr Tui. He found that Mr Colmore had been 14 continuously incapacitated from full-time employment since the accident, as a consequence of the injury sustained then. He h...