CJ v XL LCRO 221 / 2010 (1 July 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]
...inspection of the goods to avoid this fact being discovered. [14] Subsequently, as the dispute progressed towards Trial, all briefs of evidence referred to the fact that 7/8 of the stock had been sold, and the matter proceeded on that basis. The emails [15] The second aspect of the Respondent’s conduct about which the Applicant complains, relates to the evidence that was produced at the Trial. [16] On 13 September 2007 at 4.01 p.m., the Applicant had written by email to Mr...