Search Results

1. Tomov v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 34 [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...respondents are misguided. At no stage prior to the adjudication did PBS seek to be removed from the proceedings, despite having the opportunity to do so. The Tribunal is not a pleadings-based jurisdiction and it was open to PBS to simply file an email providing reasons as to why it should be removed. For the Tribunal now to receive evidence and submissions at this very late stage would in effect be to undermine the Tribunal’s own processes. [85] The purpose of the Weat...

2. LCRO 139/2017 ML v OP QR [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...Attendances” (sale proposals invoice), “LINZ Attendance” (sale to [TTT] invoice). She also queries why she has been charged for “stationery”, “postage” (all three invoices), “facsimile charges” (sale proposals, sale to [TTT] invoices), “Email printing charges” (sale proposals, sale to [TTT] invoices). Response Deduction of fees [21] In response, Mr OP states that the position he took in his letter dated 12 May 2017 to Mr BG stands. In essence Mr OP’s argume...

3. Deputy Registrar - Utakura 7 Block (2010) 7 Taitokerau MB 71 (7 TTK 71) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...question of cancellation of roadways, I note that in the course of ML 403297 being prepared and the survey staff wrestling with the question of the existence of the roadway, the suggestion was made by one of the survey staff to the Project staff (email dated 15 April 2008) that “where an order is made cancelling several titles and substituting one title that this would include cancelling any roadways unless they made specific reference to give access to a block not included in the a...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 97 Banks v Hockey Manawatu Inc [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...agreed bundle of documents became available on 14 January 2016, not long before the hearing commenced. She said it was a vital document which should have been produced much earlier, indeed at the investigation meeting, especially as multiple emails had been sent on behalf of Mr Banks during the lead-up to the substantive 28 At [22]. 29 At [69] – [71]. investigation meeting requesting production of all relevant docum...

5. Family Court rewrite submission: Backbone Collective [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...submission along with notes taken from our face to face meeting with the Panel on 19 September 2018, the submissions we have collated and presented to the panel from 42 children and young people and the eight Backbone reports shared with the panel via email. a) All Eyes on the Family Court: A watchdog report from the Backbone Collective1 b) Out of the Frying Pan and into the Fire: Women’s experiences of the New Zealand Family Court2 c) Don’t Tell Me Your Problems: The Family C...

6. Offord v Patel [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...the claimants to advise the Tribunal of the total interest that would be paid by the claimants up to and including 5 December 2008, being the date on which the decision of the Tribunal would be released. In answer to that request the following email was received on that same day: “The total interest to 5 December 2008, on the basis agreed by all parties, is therefore $43,104.77. From that should be deducted interest of $565.27 for half the cost of the painting ($4,942.12...

7. November 2019 Outstanding Applications [pdf, 663 KB]

   ...of the Chief Registrar in Wellington, quoting the appropriate application number at: Physical address: Postal address: L7, Fujitsu Tower, 141 The Terrace DX Box SX11203 WELLINGTON WELLINGTON Phone: 04 914 3102 Fax: 04 914 3100 Email: maoriappellatecourt@justice.govt.nz RTR WAITITI Chief Registrar, Māori Land Court and Māori Appellate Court 2 APPLICATION NO: SECTION: APPLICANT: SUBJEC A20070003193 45/93 Elizabeth Raukawa...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 222 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd [pdf, 311 KB]

   HAIG DAVID CHARLES FLASHOFF v NEW ZEALAND TECHNOLOGY GROUP HAWKES BAY LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 222 [9 December 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2020] NZEmpC 222 EMPC 319/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN HAIG DAVID CHARLES FLASHOFF First Plaintiff AND DONALD PETER PRICE Second Plaintiff AND RAYMON

9. September 2019 Outstanding Applications [pdf, 648 KB]

   ...of the Chief Registrar in Wellington, quoting the appropriate application number at: Physical address: Postal address: L7, Fujitsu Tower, 141 The Terrace DX Box SX11203 WELLINGTON WELLINGTON Phone: 04 914 3102 Fax: 04 914 3100 Email: maoriappellatecourt@justice.govt.nz RTR WAITITI Chief Registrar, Māori Land Court and Māori Appellate Court 2 APPLICATION NO: SECTION: APPLICANT: SUBJEC A20070003193 45/93 Elizabeth Raukawa...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 199 SKP Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.9 MB]

    ...to Mr Ormsby's affidavit discussed the governance difficulties of the Board after 2014, acknowledges the other litigation including the continuing uncertainty deriving from the Maori Land Court decision. some communication difficulties with emails, and confirms the commitment in the letter of 18 December 2018 to engage with both Ngati Paoa entities until the mandate dispute is resolved. These matters were further discussed by Mr Ormsby at paragraphs [55] to [60] of his affidavit....