Search Results

1. CAC 20006 v Azimi [2014] NZREADT 69 [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...were completed by me, and that I may have provided either Eli or Patrick with a copy of my passport and driver licence. 23. At no stage did I envisage that false information would be provided in the application. I can't recall but would have emailed or called Patrick or Eli with personal documents, including bank statements, etc 24. Patrick and Eli were known to each other as Eli's husband had also worked for the same company. 25. I deny that I ever provided information...

2. O'Connell & Anor v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 7 [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...then limited knowledge of the required recladding) concluded that the wall planes highlighted, might require recladding as the result of additional investigation. [21] Kaizon met with Karen Malcolm of the Council. Ms Malcolm subsequently emailed Kaizon stating: There would also be a requirement that confirmation be given that the walls to have targeted repairs have the building wrap correctly wrapped, failure to determine this would mean that Council would not be abl...

3. Singh v Singh and Scorpion Liquor (2006) Ltd [2016] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...inconsistency is less minor and indicates the plaintiff’s tendency to embellish. This inconsistency relates to his description of his duties at the liquor store. He said his duties included customer assistance and security. Having read his emails to the Human Rights Commission and considered his own admission that he needed his brother, and later a Hindi interpreter, to assist him with his complaint, we are inclined to believe Shane Singh and Aaed “Mike” Abu Iaila that his...

4. Family justice reforms: An initial cohort analysis [pdf, 898 KB]

   ...Management System (RMS) and the court’s Case Management System (CMS). Data from the two systems were linked by probabilistic matching. This involves using common information from two systems such as names, aliases, dates of birth, addresses, emails and phone numbers to determine that a person in one system is likely to be the same person in the other system. This method of data matching is not ideal. We are unable to state with confidence how accurately the match represents ev...

5. [2017] NZEnvC 180 Ngai te hapu Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC \ 30 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under s 120 of the Act BETWEEN NGAI TE HAPQ INCORPORATED (ENV-20 16-AKL -000042) NGA POTIKI A TAMAPAHORE TRUST (ENV-2016-AKL-000045) Appellants AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND ASTROLABE COMMUNITY TRUST Applicant Court: Environment Judge JA Smith Date of Decision: 31 October 2017 Date of Issue: 31 Oc

6. LCRO Annual Report 2010 [pdf, 517 KB]

   ...were provided to the Practitioner. Obtaining the Vendors’ approval was complicated by the fact that the two Vendors were each presented by different lawyers, thus requiring separate consents. But both consents were on the file, contained in brief emails, and the LCRO it possible that the Practitioner had overlooked these consents. Copies of the Vendors’ consents were forwarded to both parties, they being informed that the review would be postponed pursuant to section 201 of the Lawyer...

7. October 2020 Notification of Applications in Office of Chief Registrar [pdf, 573 KB]

   ...of the Chief Registrar in Wellington, quoting the appropriate application number at: Physical address: Postal address: L7, Fujitsu Tower, 141 The Terrace DX Box SX11203 WELLINGTON WELLINGTON Phone: 04 914 3102 Fax: 04 914 3100 Email: mlc.chief-registrars.office@justice.govt.nz RTR WAITITI Chief Registrar, Māori Land Court and Māori Appellate Court 2 APPLICATION NO: SECTION: APPLICANT: SUBJECT: A20070003193 45/93 Elizabet...

8. D-G Conservation - EiC - M J Brass - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 455 KB]

   ...Director-General of Conservation / Tumuaki Ahurei dated 5th February 2021 Department of Conservation / Te Papa Atawhai RMA Shared Services Operations Group Private Bag 4715 Christchurch 8140 Solicitor: Pene Williams Email: pwilliams@doc.govt.nz M Brass Evidence: Proposed Plan Change 7 to Regional Plan: Water for Otago [DOC-6540513] 2 Table of Contents Summary of key points ........................................................

9. Hutcheson v Clarkson - Mangamaire B No 2 Block (2020) 86 Takitimu MB 283 (86 TKT-283) [pdf, 379 KB]

   ...hear from Mr Hope on that matter, given the trustees have now waived privilege. [42] Counsel also submitted that independent inquiries have revealed the Court sent copies of the decision to the trustees themselves in February 2020, and also by email at some stage. This would have given the trustees approximately one month to answer the Court’s questions and file the information, which should not have been an onerous task given it is all information 86 Tākitimu MB 295 that ou...

10. Tata v Tata - Waiwhakaata 3E 4C Lot 2A Block (Hiiona Marae) [2020] Maori Appellate Court MB 166 (2020 Appeal166) [pdf, 427 KB]

    2020 Māori Appellate Court MB 166 I TE KOOTI PĪRA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO In the Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand Waikato-Maniapoto District A20180009413, APPEAL 2018/23 A20190001839, APPEAL 2019/1 WĀHANGA Under Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Waiwhakaata 3E 4C Lot 2A Block (Hiiona Marae) I WAENGA I A Between DAVID TATA Te Kaipīra Tuatahi First Appellant ME