Search Results

1. AT v Accident Compensation Corporation (Mental Injury) [2023] NZACC 131 [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...regarding the country in which the incident occurred is irrelevant as at the date of injury, when the claim was lodged, the appellant was a full time resident of New Zealand”. [37] On 24 December 2019, the respondent wrote to Mr Kletzkin by way of email, requesting the following information: (a) How long the appellant was living in Australia; (b) Did the appellant ever come back to New Zealand, and if so, could she provide these dates; and (c) If she was a child during th...

2. OIA-94638.pdf [pdf, 7 MB]

   ...s9(2)(a) ena koe Official Information Act 1982 request: Cabinet Paper Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 contactus@Just ice.govt.nz I www.Justice.govt.nz Our ref: 94638 Thank you for your email of 23 March 2022, in which you requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), the Cabinet Paper "Criminal Defences Reform: Necessity and Partial Defences (Provocation and Infanticide)" of 18 November 2003 (Cabin...

3. Mann v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction, Social Rehabilitation, Costs on Review) [2023] NZACC 91 [pdf, 365 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 91 ACR 138/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN SHANE MANN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 1 June 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: K Koloni for Mr Mann F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment

4. LCRO 10/2024 BV and XV v OQ (28 May 2025) [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...response. Standards Committee decision [34] The Committee identified the professional conduct requiring determination was whether Mr OQ was in breach of r 5.4 of the Rules.4 2 NH v Singh LCRO 53/2013, 27 August 2014 per Review Officer Thresher. 3 Email from the Complaints Service to Mr OQ (3 October 2023). 4 The Committee noted Mrs BV and Mr XV’s reference in their complaint to r 5.4.1 of the Rules but held that it had no application because there was no evidence that Mr OQ had or...

5. Sycamore v Kusabs - Paenoa Te Akau B [2024] Chief Judge's MB 1323 (2024 CJ 1323) [pdf, 907 KB]

   ...Louise Maria Tahau and John Peter Stebbing ii. A20200011703 by Mihingarangi Lorna Greenaway Ko te hātepe ture o te tono nei Procedural History [21] The Report was sent to those owners and affected parties for whom the Court had addresses and emails. The Court received many responses from owners and trustees of the Paenoa Te Akau Balance block who disagreed with the Report. A response was received from the applicant in support of the recommendations in the Report. [22] The Cou...

6. Disputes Tribunal Annual Report for 12 months to 31 December 2024 [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...those that remained unresolved, 68% were not pursued for reasons that related to perceptions of time, cost, stress or lack of perceived benefit. • On the other hand, of all those surveyed, 96% indicated they can use internet and can send an email, and 85% can use the internet for online video call. We can conclude from this that there is much work still to be done to increase knowledge of the Disputes Tribunal and to continue to enhance our processes to improve access to justi...

7. Volume-II-Supporting-Information-and-AEE_1-November-22.pdf [pdf, 12 MB]

   ŌTAKI TO NORTH OF LEVIN HIGHWAY PROJECT Volume II - Notices of Requirement for a Designation and Application for Resource Consents: Supporting Information and Assessment of Effects on the Environment 1 NOVEMBER 2022 Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project VOLUME II - SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT i DISCLAIMER This Report has been prepared for the benefit of the New Zealand Transport Agency (trading as Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency).

8. Mr-Rasheeds-Authorities.pdf [pdf, 7.1 MB]

   AUTHORITIES 1 Jordan v United Kingdom [2001] ECHR 327. 2 Osman v the United Kingdom [1998] ECHR 101 3 R (Middleton) v West Somerset Coroner [2004] 2 AC 182. 4 Sarjantson v Humberside Police Chief Constable [2013] EWCA Civ 125 5 Wallace v Attorney General [2021] NZCA 506 6 Anjum Rahman, Aliya Danzeisen, Maysoon Salama. (2019). Submissions of IWCNZ to Royal Commission of Inquiry. [online]. Available at: https://islamicwomenscouncilnz.co.nz/submissions-iwcnz/ [Accessed 25 Jan. 2022] 7 Royal

9. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML evidence chief David Mitchell [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   ...of Waiheke Marinas Ltd Dated 29 April 2014 Richard Brabant/Jeremy Brabant Barristers Broker House, Level 2, 14 Vulcan Lane PO Box 1502, Shortland St Auckland City Ph: 09 309 6665 Fax: 09 309 6667 Email: richard@brabant.co.nz/jeremy@brabant.co.nz Introduction 1. My full name is David Forrester Mitchell. I am a Director of Traffic and Transportation Engineers Limited. I hold an NZCE (Civil) and a BE (Hons) from Auckland Unive...

10. [2021] NZEnvC 036 Wood & Henton v Auckland Council [pdf, 9.8 MB]

    IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MA TIER OF BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 03 b appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 E WOOD AND S HENTON (ENV-2021 -AKL-000005) CCORCORAN (ENV-2021-AKL-000006) SPAN FAIUvI BOAT YARD LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-000007) Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AUCKLAND .COUNCIL (COMMUNITY FACILITIES) Applicant Court: EnvironmentJudge MJ L Dick