Search Results

1. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block (2020) 415 Aotea MB 1 (415 AOT 1) [pdf, 720 KB]

   415 Aotea MB 1 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20180004434 A20180004854 A20180006936 WĀHANGA Under Sections 43. 19(1)(a). (b). (c), 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block I WAENGA I A Between PHILLIP TAUEKI AND CHARLES RUDD Ngā Kaitono Applicants ME And JONATHAN PROCTER, MATHEW SWORD,

2. Willowridge Developments Ltd & Remarkables Park Ltd - Claire Hunter - EIC - 25 February 2022 [pdf, 11 MB]

   Solicitor acting G M Todd / B B Gresson PO Box 124 Queenstown 9348 P: 03 441 2743 graeme@toddandwalker.com ben@toddandwalker.com Counsel instructed B J Matheson Richmond Chambers 33 Shortland Street Auckland 1140 matheson@richmondchambers.co.nz IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-128 I TE KŌTI TAIAO KI ŌTAUTAHI UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) of the Act

3. 2023-08-101114-O2NL-JWS-Planning.pdf [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-Ā-TARA ROHE ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consents and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin project By NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY-WAKA KOTAHI Applicant JOINT STATEMENT OF PLANNING EXPERTS 10, 11 and

4. 2021-07-05 Transcript (up until1.30pm of day 39).pdf [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...restricted discretionary activity rule recommended by the planners or is that not something that 10 you’ve had an opportunity to consider? A. Well as I say and it says here in that submission, I – because there was notice and there was an email and notification of plan change 7 which stated, “there is a rule for activities that do not have five years of data and that do not meet not planned criteria for a short term consent”. So this is 15 what I’m presented with by Ota...

5. Independent Electoral Review Final Report Accessible word doc [docx, 9.5 MB]

   2 Final Report [image: Independent Electoral Review Logo] He Arotake Pōtitanga Motuhake Independent Electoral Review Final Report Our recommendations for a fairer, clearer, and more accessible electoral system November 2023 This report may be cited as: Independent Electoral Review, 2023. Final Report: Our Recommendations for a Fairer, Clearer, and More Accessible Electoral System. Wellington: New Zealand. ISBN 978-0-473-69963-5 (Print) ISBN 978-0-473-69964-2 (Online) [image:

6. Technical report of evaluation of the court-referred restorative justice pilot [pdf, 681 KB]

   Evaluation of the Court-Referred Restorative Justice Pilot: Technical Report Prepared by the Crime and Justice Research Centre Victoria University of Wellington with Sue Triggs for the Ministry of Justice May 2005 2 DISCLAIMER This research was commissioned by the former Department for Courts. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the a

7. Characteristics associated with the early identification of complex Family Court custody cases [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...a number of different perspectives. Interviews were completed with 11 Family Court Judges, 33 Family Court staff, 9 CYF solicitors, 22 lawyers and 11 specialist report writers. The ‘interview’ with one judge was completed through an exchange of emails because he was going on leave. All but one of the interviews with Family Court staff were completed as a group discussion. Three CYF solicitors took part in a group discussion, the remaining 6 were interviewed individually. One interview wit...

8. Far North District Council - Okahu 3B2B2 (2015) 97 Taitokerau MB 234 (97 TTK 234) [pdf, 396 KB]

   ...my reserved judgment, the IMC publicly notified the 9 February 2015 hearing in the Northland Age. 6 [9] It is less than ideal that the three meetings of owners were not publicly notified. However, I accept that the combination of the emails to owners and their families for whom addresses were held, the reference in the media to the application, and the public notice of the 9 February 2015 hearing amount to reasonable notice of the ahu whenua trust proposal. That is, the n...

9. [2014] NZEmpC 229 Brown Sycamore v New Zealand Basing Limited of Hong Kong [pdf, 306 KB]

   DAVID BROWN v NEW ZEALAND BASING LIMITED of Hong Kong (a wholly owned subsidiary of CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED of Hong Kong) NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 229 [15 December 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 229 EMPC 237/2014 IN THE MATTER OF proceeding removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DAVID BROWN First Plaintiff AND GLEN SYCAMORE Second Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND BASING LIMITED of

10. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants [2015] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...sent a letter to NZICA requesting a copy of the handwritten comments to which Mr Cann had referred. He also asked to inspect the file relating to the 2010 review. Initially NZICA responded the information would be made available but subsequently by email dated 20 May 2011 from NZICA’s General Counsel Mr Newson was advised the material would be withheld in reliance on s 29(1)(b) of the Act. [21] On or about 26 May 2011 Mr Newson made a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner and the...