GT v TJ LCRO 10 / 2011 (20 January 2012) [pdf, 57 KB]
...acted for the Applicant in about 12 years. [17] I accept that the Standards Committee was correct in the view that it took. The Applicant‟s belief that he remained a client of the firm is immaterial. The lawyer-client relationship does not endure forever. The Standards Committee‟s explanation about the nature of the relationship was correctly set out in its decision. [18] I also agree that the Committee was correct in the view that the Practitioner‟s involvement or advic...