Search Results

1. ORC & Kai Tahu Ki Otago - EIC - Edward Ellison - 17 September 2021 [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...Water 4 Regional Plan Governance Group. I am a former Manager Iwi Liaison at ORC and former Deputy Kaiwhakahaere for Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu. 3 I have many years of experience in engaging with local authorities and Crown agencies on environmental management matters on behalf of Te Rūnanga o Ōtākou and other Otago Rūnaka. 4 I have been asked to give this evidence on behalf of Te Rūnanga o Moeraki, Kāti Huirapa Rūnaka ki Puketeraki, Te Rūnanga o Ōtākou and Ho...

2. 16-May-2020-Regional-Plan-Waste-for-Otago-Table-of-Contents-PC1-proposed-amendments.pdf [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...New Rule 6.6.4 .................................................................................................................... 81 Amended Principal Reasons for hazardous substances and hazardous waste rules ............ 82 Amended Anticipated Environmental Result 6.7.6 ............................................................. 82 Chapter 7 Amended Issue 7.2.2 ............................................................................................................ 87 Amended Is...

3. 2021-12-17 Willowridge & Remarkables Park - MOC - re witnesses at March 2022 hearing [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...attended mediation were directed to advise of the witnesses they intend to call. [2] Willowridge Developments Limited and Remarkables Park Limited intend to call the following witnesses: (a) Claire Hunter (planning); and (b) Quinn McEntyre (environmental consultant). Dated: 17 December 2021 …………………………………………… B B Gresson Counsel for Willowridge Developments Limited …………………………………………….. R A...

4. E79 CVA - Te Kawerau Iwi Tribunal Authority [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Innovation and Employment, the State Services Commission and Treasury) in developing the project assumptions, location options and decision-making criteria for the America’s Cup infrastructure (as outlined in the Executive Summary of the Assessment of Environmental Effects dated 13th April 2018). It is noted, that Te Kawerau ā Maki were not involved in this initial scoping phase so is only commenting on the proposal submitted with the Assessment of Effects in 2018. Under the principa...

5. [2020] NZEnvC 186 Panuku Development Auckland Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 186 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent R Peters and R Bannan R Dexter and A Modrow N Smith P Lange L Whiley s 27 4 parties Court: Environment Judge M Harland Commissioner K Edmonds Commissioner D Bun

6. [2017] NZEnvC 169 Ngai Te Hapu Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...Forum (Te Arawa Takitai) PH Cooney and RC Zame for Bay of Plenty Regional Council as respondent (the Respondent) JM Pou, JA Hope and AM Neems for Maketu Taiapure Committee, Nga Tangata Ahikaroa 0 Maketu , Ngati Makino Heritage Trust, Ngati Pikiao Environmental Society and Ngati Tunohopu 1M Gordon for Te Kahui Kaumatua 0 Te Patuwai (the Korowai of Elders) K Barry-Piceno for Motiti Environment Management Incorporated JR Welsh for Mount Maunganui Underwater Club Incorporated VJ Hamm for...

7. [2020] NZEnvC 025 Willis Bond Capital Partners No. 3 Limited [pdf, 914 KB]

   ...filling will exceed 250 m2 - a discretionary activity (restricted); • The use and development of potentially contaminated land (Rule 32.2.1) - a discretionary activity (restricted). [27] Consent for a discretionary activity under the National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health (2011) is required for the associated soil disturbance and change in land use. [28] There is agreement that on a bundled approach, the resource co...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 117 High Quality v Auckland Council [pdf, 885 KB]

   ...and amenity. Putting aside rural character and amenity, the question is whether or not a discretionary activity can effectively be prohibited by the wording within policies or rules. Certainly that is not our understanding of the decision of Environmental Defence Society Inc v New Zealand King Salmon Company Ltd4 although this was quoted to us by the Council. Albert Road Investments v Auckland Council5 is quoted by the applicant relating to a two-lot subdivision containing one ho...

9. [2023] NZEnvC 048 Evans v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 944 KB]

   EVANS v MDC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 48 IN THE MATTER of the Biosecurity Act 1993 AND of an application under s76 of the Act BETWEEN GEOFFREY IAN TUDOR EVANS (ENV-2020-CHC-105) Applicant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner S Myers Hearing: in Blenheim on 27 September 2022 Appearances: Q A M Davies and

10. [2024] NZEnvC 187 Gisborne District Council v Barraclough [pdf, 6.2 MB]

    ...be provided, and no further earthworks be carried out until the plan is approved. [2] The application was supported by the following affidavits from: (a) David Sluter, a Council enforcement officer. He addressed site inspections and assessed environmental effects; (b) Kevin Ford, a Council enforcement officer. He addressed the compliance history of the site, Council inspections, and the reasonableness of requiring compliance with an abatement notice; (c) Gregor McLean, an env...