2959 items matching your search terms
... that: (a) the Ambient Air Quality Standards (“AAAQS”) impose greater restrictions on activities than what is provided for in the National Environmental Standard for Air Quality; (b) the imposition of those higher standards does not promote the purpose of the RMA; (c) there is no justificatio...
... that: (a) the Ambient Air Quality Standards (“AAAQS”) impose greater restrictions on activities than what is provided for in the National Environmental Standard for Air Quality; (b) the imposition of those higher standards does not promote the purpose of the RMA; (c) there is no justificatio...
... that: (a) the Ambient Air Quality Standards (“AAAQS”) impose greater restrictions on activities than what is provided for in the National Environmental Standard for Air Quality; (b) the imposition of those higher standards does not promote the purpose of the RMA; (c) there is no justificatio...
...in the submission on the resource consent application, dated February 281 '\ 2023. I understand this submission has already been filed with the court by the applicant. Issues include: • The CIA presented by Ngati Raukawa and Assessment of Environmental Effects include inaccurate historical narratives about Muaapoko, and other Kurahaupo f-wi. • Nluai7poko information and appropriate design responses are not included in the CEDF. • Muaftpoko rangatiratanga, mana 1-11hakahaer...
...may state - (a) the significant resource management issues for the district; and (b) the methods, other than rules, for implementing the policies for the district; and (c) the principal reasons for adopting the policies and methods; and (d) the environmental results expected from the policies and methods; and (e) the procedures for monitoring the efficiency and effectiveness of the policies and methods; and (f) the processes for dealing with issues that cross territorial authority b...
...of evidence 1.8 My evidence addresses: (a) Key issue and positions (section 2); (b) Relevant RPS provisions (section 3); (c) Relevant PRCEP Maps and Schedules (section 4); (d) Other relevant PRCEP provisions (section 5); (e) Motiti Island Environmental Management Plan (section 6) (f) Discussion of planning issues (section 7) (g) My planning conclusion (section 8). 2 Key issue and positions 2.1 I understand that the key issue for this appeal is to reconcile the quite differen...
...to the claimants, who are Māori living on or affiliating to Motiti Island . Motiti Māori are an isolated island community in an especially vulnerable position . They will bear the brunt of what seem likely to be significant adverse cultural and environmental effects if the wreck is allowed to remain on the reef . It is in this light that we consider that the Crown’s consultation with them has been neither robust nor meaningful . The consultation process has neither adequately informed...
...• The wider eco~omic position associotion with an extended IIlnway -Including the costsibenefits associaled with a~y of the RESA options, or otller economidactors as wetl as any b911Snts to WIAL that may derive irom the extenslo~ Itself. • Environmental- are lIlere a~y likely C(Jnse~lability issues associated with proYkiing a RESA extension (whilst acknowledging Ihat thi, is ultimotely a matter for the Environment Court)? EMAS as a produ~t has not yet been installed at a N0W Zeala...
...buildings and all operations and management shall be carried out in accordance with the following documents, except where subsequently modified through the consent process, in which case the latter shall prevail: a) Application Form and Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by Isle Land Limited, dated April 2017 b) Letter from Isle Land Limited dated 5 July 2017 c) Report by Commute Transportation Consultants dated 20 June 2017 d) The following plans included in Attachment...
...been used in the past; (2) Requiring minimum flow, residual flow or take cessation conditions on existing consents to be carried over as consent conditions on any consents that replace existing water permits; and (3) Reducing the risk of further environmental degradation and unforeseen economic hardship for water users, by discouraging further investment in irrigation expansion or land use intensification until a new NPS-FM 2020 compliance planning framework has bene introduced (tha...