Search Results

1. BORA Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading And Other Matters) Amendment Bill [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...(freedom of expression) of the Bill of Rights Act. However, these limits are clearly justified under section 5 of that Act. In regard to the powers to compel information, we note that if a person is required to appear to give evidence before the Environmental Protection Authority, an enforcement officer, or a District Court Judge, this cannot be used in evidence against the person in criminal proceedings. 4. The Bill confers upon enforcement officers the power to enter land or pre...

2. 2020-11-12 Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...be served, including this notice, are to be sent to the party at their alternative address. Signature of person wishing to be party (or person authorised to sign on their behalf) Date 12 November 2020 Richard Grant Allen Manager Environmental Policy Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd *Note: If this notice is not filed by the due date, you may apply to the court under section 281 of the Resource Management Act 1991 for a waiver of this timing requirement. htt...

3. Auckland Regional Public Health Service 225 [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...effects on human health. (c) The reasons the respondent gave in its decision to reject the Hearing Panel's recommendations are sound and supported by ARPHS. (d) Council has the ability under Regulation 28 of the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Air Quality) Regulations 2004 (NES­ AQ) to impose more stringent rules, and thereby more stringent air quality standards. The 2004 NES-AO is out of date, and there is scientific justification to impose standard...

4. Auckland Regional Public Health Service 228 [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...effects on human health. (c) The reasons the respondent gave in its decision to reject the Hearing Panel's recommendations are sound and supported by ARPHS. (d) Council has the ability under Regulation 28 of the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Air Quality) Regulations 2004 (NES­ AQ) to impose more stringent rules, and thereby more stringent air quality standards. The 2004 NES-AQ is out of date, and there is scientific justification to impose standard...

5. Auckland Regional Public Health Service 222 [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...effects on human health. (c) The reasons the respondent gave in its decision to reject the Hearing Panel's recommendations are sound and supported by ARPHS. (d) Council has the ability under Regulation 28 of the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Air Quality) Regulations 2004 (NES­ AO) to impose more stringent rules, and thereby more stringent air quality standards. The 2004 NES-AQ is out of date, and there is scientific justification to impose standard...

6. Auckland Regional Public Health Service 217 [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...effects on human health. (c) The reasons the respondent gave in its decision to reject the Hearing Panel's recommendations are sound and supported by ARPHS. (d) Council has the ability under Regulation 28 of the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Air Quality) Regulations 2004 (NES­ AQ) to impose more stringent rules, and thereby more stringent air quality standards. The 2004 NES-AQ is out of date, and there is scientific justification to impose standard...

7. 2020-12-16 ORC MOC Willowridge s 274 notice [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...earthworks activities) and Rule 14.5.2 (restricted discretionary earthworks activities). Other submitters have sought the removal of these rules and this was set out as a decision requested in the summary of submissions publicly notified by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). Anyone with an interest in these rules was therefore on notice of submitters seeking the removal of these rules and had an opportunity to lodge a further submission. On that basis, it is not cons...

8. Environment Court: Covid-19 Protocol [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...Court is not categorised by the Chief Justice and Heads of Bench as a Category 1 essential service court. 3. All cases listed for hearing in the week of 23 March 2020 in the Environment Court have been adjourned, except for ENV-2020-AKL-025, Environmental Protection Agency which is being processed on the papers. 4. While a Level 4 alert is in place, the Environment Court will not physically sit in courtrooms or elsewhere. Alternative dispute resolution such as mediation and expe...

9. 20-03-25 Environment Court protocol [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...Court is not categorised by the Chief Justice and Heads of Bench as a Category 1 essential service court. 3. All cases listed for hearing in the week of 23 March 2020 in the Environment Court have been adjourned, except for ENV-2020-AKL-025, Environmental Protection Agency which is being processed on the papers. 4. While a Level 4 alert is in place, the Environment Court will not physically sit in courtrooms or elsewhere. Alternative dispute resolution such as mediation and expe...

10. BORA Dairy Industry Restructuring Amendment Bill [pdf, 87 KB]

    ...package of measures to maintain regulatory disciplines on Fonterra’s activities and enhance aspects of the dairy industry’s performance by: a. removing some regulatory requirements that are no longer necessary to support and encourage better environmental performance of the dairy industry; b. providing Fonterra with more flexibility to manage some aspects of its operations; and c. providing increased clarity on aspects of the regulatory regime for both Fonterra and other dairy ind...