Search Results

1. Form 16 [docx, 42 KB]

   ...am the consent holder or I made a submission on that applica‐ tion or review of consent conditions). I received notice of the decision on [date]. The decision was made by [name of consent authority or, in relation to a certificate of compliance, the Environmental Protection Authority]. I have a right to appeal this decision under section 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991. The decision to which this appeal relates is not one of those activities excluded by section 120(1A) or (1B) of that...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 243 Swap Stockfoods Limited v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...Ngāti Kuku is a hapū of the Ngāi te Rangi iwi of Tauranga Moana. Te Runanga o Ngāi Te Rangi Iwi Trust was part of the PC13 proceedings as a s 274 party. Mr Ngātuere has previously given evidence in the PC13 proceedings for Ngāi te Rangi as its environmental spokesperson. [11] As to the involvement of Ngati Kuku and Whareroa Marae in the s 293 proceedings, Mr Ngātuere stated in the affidavit: 4 Involvement of Ngāti Kuku and Whareroa Marae in the proceedings … Ng...

3. 2020-10-16-EPA-PC7-Summary-of-Submissions-Further-Submission-Spreadsheet.xlsx [xlsx, 154 KB]

   ...years) replacement of permits with review conditions, without “clawing back” allocation or preventing irrigation of land uses prior to a new land and water plan framework that gives effect to the NPSFM. N Plan Change 7 70033 70033.01 Central Otago Environmental Society Inc. Support Implement an interim consenting regime to ensure that issued consents are fit for purpose and do not undermine the implementation of the NPSFWM 2020. Consents issued going forward must implement the NPSFWM 2020...

4. ENV-2016-AKL-000188 Lenihan v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...written for flat sites, TitirangilLaiogholm is mostly slopiog and often steep, so many existing houses breach this rule already and vacant sites tend to be the steepcst. A higher buildiog on a smaller footpriot requires less coverage and has less environmental impact than a house that sprawls to maintaio the 8m height limit. A sprawliog house has to step down many levels and is very costly to construct which is contradictory to the aims of the Auckland Plan to create affordable efficient h...

5. Mullen - Hongoeka 4A (2006) 176 Aotea MB 191 (176 AOT 191) [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...also submitted that the process of consultation had been inadequate and that there was consequently a lack of support for the company's proposals fi-om amongst the landowners affected and within the Hongoeka community generally. The issue of environmental impacts and related affects were also raised as a concem. The Law [26] Section 326B ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 states: "326B Reasonable access may be granted in cases of landlocked Maori land Minute Book : 176...

6. Pomare v Rangihaeata - Hongoeka 7 (2009) 16 Whanganui Appellate Court MB 88 (16 WGAP 88) [pdf, 420 KB]

   ...not represent an error in the decision, nor does it landlock Hongoeka Bay and Hongoeka Marae. Improved access is provided. [31] The respondents referred to the great expense that forming the existing legal roadway would incur, as well as the environmental concerns that would arise. [32] In terms of the roadway width, the evidence presented on behalf of Porirua City Council, was that a roadway width of 20 metres would not necessarily allow the possible developments referred to by t...

7. Sanford Limited [pdf, 476 KB]

   ...alternative location exists, or is workable for fishing industry activities. It would be inappropriate to grant consent to the Proposal until such time as these matters have been appropriately resolved, and it can be demonstrated that the adverse environmental effects, including on the Submitters, can be appropriately avoided, remedied or mitigated. (c) Further, and more fundamentally, the Submitters are concerned that their relocation from their current berthage areas is likely...

8. Final name suppression December 2018 [xlsx, 93 KB]

   ...offences 273 244 164 532 273 389 675 428 187 286 10% 10% 7% 18% 10% 13% 20% 14% 7% 12% 10: Illicit drug offences 158 147 210 251 162 485 176 233 178 72 6% 6% 9% 9% 6% 16% 5% 7% 6% 3% 11: Prohibited and regulated weapons and explosives offences 56 37 39 31 23 21 23 39 26 20 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 107 96 83 36 30 34 35 47 84 45 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 13: Public order offences 379 482 226 341 220 230 229 175 138 99 14% 19% 10% 12% 8...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 157 Van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd [pdf, 475 KB]

   ...documents involved; (c) the ease and cost of retrieving a document; (d) the significance of any document likely to be found; and (e) the need for discovery to be proportionate to the subject matter of the proceeding. [23] In Northland Environmental Protection Society Inc v The Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries, it was held in the circumstances of that case that the extraction and review of some 9,700 emails would not be considered oppressive, since the...

10. Te Manutukutuku Issue 35 [pdf, 5.7 MB]

    ...and student exercises. Te Roroa resource kit l ~ z ii .... ~~~::::..:::...::~l Maunganui Bluff, a key feature of the Maunganui block (from Te Roroa resource kit) Those resource kits available from the Waitangi Tribunal are: Set One Kaituna Environmental pollution claim, Rotorua Set Two Motunui-Waitara Environmental pollution claim, Taranaki Set Three Te Roroa Historical land loss claim, Northland Set Four Orakei Historical land loss claim, Auckland Order Form Name: Address:...