Search Results

1. LCRO 186/2019 ZU v FD (15 June 2021) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...This is also a matter which will be considered by the investigator appointed as per item (a) above. [32] The Committee then appointed Messrs JV and KM to undertake this task. The Committee’s instructions were to: 1. Review the lawyer’s files and costing records; 2. Request further information from the complainant or the lawyer as might be necessary for the purpose of your assessment; 3. To contact Mr ZU and the complainant, Mr FD, to discuss the costs aspects of the compla...

2. Reedy - Waitangi A1A2 (2003) 65 Ruatōria MB 168 (65 RUA 168) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Clerk of the Court 12 May 2003 Application No: A20020002622 Subject: Sections: Counsel: Waitangi A1A2 & Other Blocks 238/93 Mr Bunbury DECISION Application and Issues Minute Book: 65 RUA 168 This matter concerns an application filed by Mr Manana Kaua Terangi Reedy under section 239/93 for the replacement of Trustees. That application was filed in April 2002. After considering the grounds for bringing the application, I directed that the application be amended to a...

3. BN Ltd v DL [2020] NZDT 1517 (11 December 2020) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 28 days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside 28 days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting af...

4. AA v BB [2024] NZDT 80 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supp...

5. INZ (Calder) v Cleland [2019] NZIACDT 25 (3 May 2019) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...Immigration Adviser. • Assist in recording information on the application form. • Lodge visa applications with INZ. • Organise travel to New Zealand. • Assist family members (spouse and children) in their visa application (with additional fee). • Provide settlement information, if already in New Zealand. [13] The agreement was usually signed by both IPS and the client. In respect of three of the 12 clients, IPS did not sign it.2 Mr Cleland also signed in his capacity...

6. LCRO 60/2023 VE v NB (30 April 2025) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...breached rr 4.4.1 and 7.2 of the CCCR by refusing to provide copies of time records relating to our matter in response to our written requests for the same; d. Whether Mr NB breached any aspect of r 3.4(a) CCCR by failing to provide us with adequate fee information; 3 The original of the photo ID needs to be sighted and the copy certified as a true likeness which requires the certifier to either meet the person or by other acceptable means. 4 Application for review, above n 1, Supp...

7. CI v LI [2022] NZDT 227 (5 December 2022) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...agrees she received a total of $38,000.00 but only $13,000.00 was in cash and $25,000.00 was by way of direct credit to her account and both amounts she received were a gift. 4. LI alleges CI’s actions have caused her additional costs with legal fees. She claims $1265.00 plus her filing fee. 5. The issues I must decide are: a. Did CI give LI, in total, $63,000.00 or $38,000.00? b. If $63,000.00, what were the terms and conditions of the $25,000.00 and is LI in breach of th...

8. LCRO 144/2016 QT v UF (24 August 2018) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...application for review of both determinations, in which he seeks to overturn the Committees findings, to this Office by email on 21 June 2016. The following day, 22 June 2016, this Office received from him both the original of his application, and the filing fee of $50. [26] He claims that by having emailed his application to this Office on 21 June 2016 he had complied with the statutory 30 working days time limit within which an application for review of a Standards Committee’...

9. Chand v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 119 (19 December 2014) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...Chand’s father engaged Mr Ahuja to provide immigration services. Mr Ahuja was employed in a practice which Global Immigration Consultants Ltd. (Global) owned. He was the sole licensed immigration adviser in the practice. [2] Mr Chand’s father paid fees for his initial consultation with Mr Ahuja. One of Global’s personnel told Mr Chand an offer of employment was available for his father. Accordingly, he should pay further fees for his immigration to progress. Mr Ahuja was not aware o...

10. Appalasamy v Yap [2014] NZIACDT 16 (25 February 2014) [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...misleading behaviour as: [6.3.1] He failed to disclose information pertinent to the visa requirements; and [6.3.2] He incorrectly said her children would be able to migrate to New Zealand as dependents. [6.4] He failed to provide a full refund of fees when the complainant realised she could not apply for a visa that would meet her needs. This occurred before the adviser had undertaken any work on the visa application. [7] The Registrar identified the material facts supporting the all...