Search Results

1. MN v LO [2024] NZDT 199 (12 March 2024) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a suppo...

2. TN v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 596 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...invoice in full. 4. TN also says claims that the charging station is not in the correct place and she would like it moved somewhere sunnier, where there is less likely to have slugs enter the charging unit. 5. Both parties have claimed the filing fee. Section 43 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 prevents the Tribunal from awarding the filing fee to a party except in very limited cases, which do not apply here. Therefore, the parties’ claims for the filing fee are not successful....

3. TL v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 90 (17 March 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...doing to be delivered on time. The breach was of substantial character and she was therefore entitled to reject the lehenga. She is entitled to a full refund of the $625.00 deposit. 6. TL’s claim was for $670.00. The balance was the tribunal filing fee. Under s43 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 2008 a party cannot recover the filing fee. Therefore, I cannot award the amount of the fee. Other information 7. EL mentioned there were signs in the shop with its store policy that say...

4. LCRO 84/2020 WF v BP (11 June 2020) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...absence of proof to the contrary, service of the Committee’s decision is presumed to have occurred on the fifth working day after it is made, given or performed or exercised.2 [5] In order to comply with the statutory timeframe prescribed for filing a review application, Mr WF was required to file his review application on or before 5 PM on Thursday 7 May 2020. [6] Mr WF’s application was clearly filed out of time. [7] The approach historically adopted by Legal Complaints Revi...

5. TC & AK v BH & TH [2021] NZDT 1306 (25 March 2021) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...payment. The Trustees maintain that they are entitled to make deductions from the final payment for costs they incurred in relation to the contract. 2. TC and AK claim $16,456.38 plus GST and interest in relation to the final milk payment, and their filing fee. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Did the Trustees breach the contract when they did not pay the final Contractor Payment to TC and AK? b) Are the Trustees entitled to deduct the costs they claim from the final C...

6. ZA v YB LCRO 164/2013 (31 August 2016) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...assist communication between Mr [YB] and his clients. Ms [RI]’s father, Mr [RI], was also involved in the claim process. The WHT had declared a conflict of interest existed between Ms [RI]/Mr [PK] and Mr [RI], and had directed the claimants to file briefs of evidence, initially by 14 December 2012, and then by 21 December 2012. 2 [3] Matters were apparently complicated by Ms [RI] and her husband separating, and being at odds over the division of relationship property, which appe...

7. Kumar v Ahuja [2015] NZIACDT 105 (21 December 2015) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...complaints the Tribunal upheld against Mr Ahuja, the respective grounds for the complaints the Tribunal upheld were: [1.1] In Chand v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 119 (IACDT 012/13) the Tribunal upheld the complaint on the basis Mr Ahuja failed to refund fees of $2,288.50, when the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the 2010 Code) required him to do so. [1.2] In this complaint, Kumar v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 120 (IACDT 013/13), the Tribunal has upheld the complaint on the basis...

8. Chand v Ahuja [2015] NZIACDT 104 (21 December 2015) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...Tribunal upheld against Mr Ahuja, the respective grounds for the complaints the Tribunal upheld were: [1.1] In this complaint, Chand v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 119 (IACDT 012/13), the Tribunal upheld the complaint on the basis Mr Ahuja failed to refund fees of $2,288.50, when the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the 2010 Code) required him to do so. [1.2] In Kumar v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 120 (IACDT 013/13), the Tribunal has upheld the complaint on the basis Mr Ahuja fail...

9. Fees

   There are fees for certain steps in District Court proceedings. These include fees for filing an application, scheduling a hearing date and for the hearing itself. Some steps in District Court proceedings do not require fees. To figure out if you need to pay a fee, check the District Courts Fees Regulations If you are unsure, please contact your nearest District Court. You can apply for the fee to be waived if you cannot afford to pay the fee, or if you believe the proceeding you want to start i...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a civil case in the District Court

10. Annual returns for licence holders

    If you have a licence, you need to send us annual returns telling us if any of your details have changed. You must do this within a year of the date you got your licence. You must also tell us if the details of anyone who works for you have changed. If you don't send a return, your licence will be suspended. You must complete 3 forms. 1. Annual return forms Company licence annual return Individual licence holder annual return 2. Disqualification criteria forms Company licence (disqualification c

    Located in:

    1. Tribunals >
    2. Licences & certificates >
    3. Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority >
    4. Replacements, updates & duties