Search Results

1. DX v WC LCRO 7 / 2011 (17 August 2011) [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...a contact regime. [4] In March 2009 R applied to vary the Parenting Order so that she could have the day to day care of the girls who would be relocated to Australia. This application was opposed by the Applicant and a notice of defence was filed in April 2009. The main reason for opposing R’s application was the Applicant’s concern that R suffered from a personality disorder that affected her ability to assume responsibility of the girls in a parental role. He did not want...

2. Rules-Committee-Amendment-Rules-2022.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...definition in the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act, and outlining Registry hours and Court holidays; 7.2. making minor updates to previously implemented Rules (the Court of Appeal (Civil) Amendment Rules 2021) which cater for documents to be filed electronically, such as by clarifying how many paper copies of documents must be provided to the Court in addition to an electronic copy; 7.3. setting out the Court’s powers to strike out or stay an application for leave to app...

3. Singh v Patel [2019] NZIACDT 29 (9 May 2019) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...successful. [5] Mr Patel went ahead and prepared an application ready for lodgement with Immigration New Zealand, with Mr Singh paying $10,000. However, prior to lodgement, a dispute arose between Mr Patel and Mr Singh. The latter uplifted the file on 21 May 2014 and requested a refund of his fees. Mr Patel initially declined a refund. [6] Mr Singh made a wide-ranging complaint against Mr Patel to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority) on 10 July 2014. At the prompti...

4. [2023] NZEmpC 129 Dhiman v Naanak Ltd [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...liq) [2022] NZERA 510 (Member Beck). [2] In a subsequent cost determination, issued on 14 November 2022, the Authority ordered Mr Mann to pay Mr Dhiman the sum of $5,375 as a contribution to his costs and to reimburse him the Authority filing fee of $71.56.2 [3] As no payment was made, Mr Dhiman then applied for and obtained compliance orders in the Authority under s 137 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) requiring Mr Mann to pay the sums awarded, together wit...

5. O Ltd & P Ltd v UU [2023] NZDT 474 (4 September 2023) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a support...

6. PI v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 745 (22 October 2024) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a suppo...

7. IQ v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 22 (3 February 2025) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a suppo...

8. Practice direction 4/2025 - Applications to Tribunal.pdf [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...Tenancy Services staff and Tribunal members as to what information must and should be provided with any application. The mandatory information that must be provided 4. Under s 86(1) of the Act, proceedings before the Tribunal are commenced by filing an application in the approved form (the application form) with any prescribed fee. 5. Tenancy Services are not to process an application if the prescribed fee has not been paid or if any of the following information relating to...

9. X Ltd v EK [2024] NZDT 784 (16 September 2024) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...take that into consideration along with the agreement then I am satisfied that the invoices raised by X Ltd are for all work completed and are due. 21. X Ltd seek costs of $2,006.70 for the hearing that was adjourned at the last moment due to EK filing a claim for adjudication with the BDT. The argument submitted is that EK has unnecessarily prolonged proceedings because at the time of the last minute adjournment EK advised he had filed a claim when he hadn’t. X Ltd, say they incurred...

10. Uia v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 62 (30 April 2014) [pdf, 105 KB]

    ...description of services (clause 1.5(b)). [6] In outline, the background was: [6.1] On 5 November 2010, the complainant entered into an agreement that the adviser would provide professional services. [6.2] The complainant had previously paid $50 in fees, and the agreement provided for further fees of $800. [6.3] The adviser undertook work for the complainant and submitted a request to Immigration New Zealand on 19 November 2010. Immigration New Zealand declined the request. [6.4]...