LCRO 77/2024 KU v CI (9 April 2025) [pdf, 170 KB]
...involvement with representing her parents should have alerted him to the fact that he could not countenance changes which affected the Deed of Family Arrangement; and (b) Mr CI had been dilatory in attending to the administration of the estate; and (c) fees charged were excessive. [9] The Complaints Service advised the parties that Ms KU’s complaint would be managed by an Early Resolution Services Committee. [10] Mr CI was not required to provide a response to the complaint but t...