Search Results

1. [2019] NZEmpC 73 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd [pdf, 446 KB]

   ...matter set out in Mr Drake’s letter had been addressed and satisfactorily responded to. [57] RightWay’s then solicitors responded to Mr Drake advising that RightWay’s preliminary position was that the claim made had no merit. Ms Kazemi filed a statement of problem in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) on 19 May 2017, to which RightWay responded. [58] By letter dated 14 July 2017 Ms Kazemi resigned from RightWay, effective 11 August 2017. [59] RightWay a...

2. [2019] NZEmpC 59 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd [pdf, 446 KB]

   ...matter set out in Mr Drake’s letter had been addressed and satisfactorily responded to. [57] RightWay’s then solicitors responded to Mr Drake advising that RightWay’s preliminary position was that the claim made had no merit. Ms Kazemi filed a statement of problem in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) on 19 May 2017, to which RightWay responded. [58] By letter dated 14 July 2017 Ms Kazemi resigned from RightWay, effective 11 August 2017. [59] RightWay a...

3. CAC20002 v Gollins [2015] NZREADT 2 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...contract being entered into between Foodstuffs and Whitby Coastal Properties on 14 September 2010. [4] The agreement for sale and purchase has a special clause at Clause 33 which said: “The purchaser shall be responsible for the agent’s fees for the licensed real estate agent set out on the front and last page of this agreement in respect of the sale notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the general terms.” [5] Mr Gollins’ name appeared on the agreement. Th...

4. LCRO 7/2016 Mr and Mrs YJ v XW (22 August 2018) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...conditions; (d) an order made for a refund from Mr XW for monies already paid; (e) an order made for cost incurred by the YJs due to Mr XW’s resignation as a Trustee (as Mr XW has consistently refused to supply a written explanation of his fees); (f) an answer to the question of how the three lump sum figures in question were calculated; (g) a ruling of unsatisfactory conduct made against Mr XW for a breach of r 3.4; 3 (h) a ruling made against Mr XW for the double char...

5. [2022] NZIACDT 10 - BC v Lawlor (18 May 2022) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...though that the brother-in-law said he only found out 7 about his unlawful status in August 2020, because the first s 61 request was filed in February 2020 with the brother-in-law’s knowledge. (4) He should have ensured the successful filing of the reconsideration application. While the fee was to be paid with his business credit card, it was linked to a client account and required funds from the client. When the officer told him payment could not be made, he rang the com...

6. Guide 1 - A guide to residence appeals [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...instructions. You can appeal on either or both of these grounds. Immigration and Protection Tribunal ­ Rōpū Take Manene, Take Whakamaru https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/immigration/immigration-and-protection/make-an-appeal/forms-and-fees/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/immigration/immigration-and-protection/practice-notes-legislation/ IPT Guide 1 – Residence Appeals – 1/07/2025 Page 2 of 8 5. How much time do I have to lodge an appeal? The Tribunal...

7. Form 31 Family Invoice Oranga Tamariki [pdf, 230 KB]

   Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 31 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Oranga Tamariki Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Plea...

8. LB v Standards Committee LCRO 77 / 2011 (1 September 2011) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...to exercise transparency” with the executors. The Inspector’s report covered a number of 2 estates handled by the firm, but particularly focused on the [X] Estate. Of this the Inspector noted that there had been a sizeable uplift in fees (near to one-third of the entire bill), and that no client care disclosure or invoice appeared to have been sent to the executors. [5] The Practitioner was sent a copy of the Inspectors report and invited to comment. The Practitioner...

9. KN v ID Inc [2021] NZDT 1527 (13 August 2021) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...dismissed. Reasons 1. On 2 May 2021 KN’s vehicle was parked in the car park adjacent to the [City] Stadium (the turf). A ball hit on the turf, flew over the fence and damaged KN’s vehicle. 2. KN is claiming $1475.00 for damage to his vehicle, filing fees and costs to prepare for the hearing. As noted during the hearing the filing fee and costs are not available to KN as this claim does not meet the required threshold under s43 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. 3. The iss...

10. NC & CC v FU Ltd [2020] NZDT 1389 (28 October 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...applicants that they considered it to be ‘wear and tear’ rather than a product fault. 3. NC and CC claim $1744.00, being $498.00 product refund, $644 for retiling behind the affected product and $552.00 for plumbing costs, as well as the Tribunal filing fee. 4. The issues to determine are: • Are the products of acceptable quality, specifically are they acceptable in appearance and finish, free from minor defects and are they durable? • What remedy, if any, is available t...