Search Results

1. Wang v Fu [2016] NZIACDT 38 (8 August 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...responding to the complaint that he had lodged the request for reconsideration in time, and had instructions to withdraw the visitor visa applications. The Registrar’s statement of complaint alleges neither claim was true. [1.5] Mr Fu took lodgement fees for the reconsideration and later requests for discretionary relief; he failed to either pay the money to Immigration New Zealand, or refund the money. [2] Mr Fu disputes the factual allegations and contends he complied with his profe...

2. TN v LI [2020] NZDT 1325 (11 August 2020) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 28 days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 28 days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting...

3. [2022] NZIACDT 26 — DA v Ji (8 November 2022) [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...was to be employed as a chef. [6] On 28 August 2017, the complainant and Ryan & Samuel Ltd entered into an immigration services agreement. Mr Ji was named as one of the advisers. The advisers were to prepare a work visa application. The fee was $10,000. [7] The complainant paid the fee of $10,000 on about 31 August 2017. [8] On 16 December 2017 and 10 January 2018, the complainant made payments totalling RMB 100,000 to a person specified by Mr Ji. The Tribunal was unab...

4. [2024] NZREADT 48 – CAC2105 v Chen, Stevenson & Buy West Realty (18 December 2024) [pdf, 565 KB]

   ...ticking the “no refund” box. [11] Ms Chen did not itemise specific costs on her marketing submissions (the marketing submissions) to identify the marketing and advertising costs to be spent by vendors, including in-house charges for technology fees and checks for compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering and Financing of Terrorism Act 2008 (AML). 1 The particulars of the charge, attached to this decision, refer to annexures which identify various properties rele...

5. SC v OX [2023] NZDT 548 (21 September 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a suppo...

6. LW v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 352 (13 May 2024) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a suppo...

7. RB v CG LCRO 117/2013 (30 June 2014) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...request of police, Ms RB registered her objection with NZLS saying Ms CG had breached her right to privacy. NZLS put that matter to Ms CG, obtained her response and dealt with it in the decision. [9] The Standards Committee considered the conduct, fees and privacy aspects of the complaint, the information the parties had provided, and decided pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (the Act) that further action on Ms RB’s complaint was unnecessary or inappropriat...

8. Final Env-Reg-Report-2018-19 [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...the court. This strategy is reflected in the Court’s Practice Note. The Ministry of Justice supports the Principal Environment Judge in the execution of that strategy through its registry and administrative case management services. Some matters filed under the RMA are substantial in terms of their complexity, range and numbers of parties and issues, and are challenging to administer. The Court's principal methods of case management are: (a) Cases that do not require priority...

9. Final Env-Reg-Report-2018-19 [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...the court. This strategy is reflected in the Court’s Practice Note. The Ministry of Justice supports the Principal Environment Judge in the execution of that strategy through its registry and administrative case management services. Some matters filed under the RMA are substantial in terms of their complexity, range and numbers of parties and issues, and are challenging to administer. The Court's principal methods of case management are: (a) Cases that do not require priority...

10. Rattray v Denbigh LCRO 211 / 2009 (16 December 2009) [pdf, 42 KB]

    ...fee. [5] This view is confirmed by the case of Customs Appeal Authority No 29/98 (1999) 1 NZCC 51,128. In that case a party wished to appeal from an assessment of customs duty. A 20-day time limit applied. The appropriate notice of appeal was filed in time but it was not accompanied by the prescribed fee. The appellant was notified of this defect and the fee was provided some days later. When the fee was paid the time for appeal had expired. The notice of the decision of Customs ha...