Search Results

Search results for filing fees.

7639 items matching your search terms

  1. KL v C Ltd [2025] NZDT 262 (17 June 2025) [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...which was notified by KL within the 12 month period as required by the BA, and so KL is entitled to damages of the cost of installing lighting, which is $1,420.33. Conclusion 59. KL sought an order that C Ltd is liable to reimburse her for the filing fee for this claim. KL has been partially successful in her claim, but the Disputes Tribunal Act provides that costs, which include the filing fee, can only be awarded by the Tribunal in exceptional cases, essentially when there has be...

  2. UU v UX [2019] NZDT 1547 (25 September 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

    ...Company], and was told that it was unlikely the wheel could be successfully repaired. 2. UU now claims $690.00, comprising a full refund of the purchase price, the cost of fitting the new tyres ($80.00) and removing them ($40.00), and his $45.00 filing fee. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Was it a term of the contract that the wheels be in good condition? b) Were the wheels in good condition? c) What remedy, if any, should be granted to UX? Was it a term of the contract that...

  3. KL & KC v EJ Ltd [2022] NZDT 269 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...taking too long to be delivered. The respondent refused to refund the deposit and cited the worldwide shipping issues as the reasons for the late delivery. The applicants claim $4,352.00 from the respondent being the deposit paid and the Tribunal’s filing fee of $90.00. 2. The issues to be determined by the Tribunal were: a. What was communicated about delivery at the time the television unit was purchased? b. Was the unit provided in accordance with the Consumer Guarantees Act 1...

  4. KD & SB v W Ltd [2024] NZDT 894 (19 December 2024) [pdf, 192 KB]

    ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a suppo...

  5. [2013] NZEmpC 6 Weston v Advkit Para Legal Services Ltd [pdf, 70 KB]

    ...at a total of $70 to mainly cover travelling expenses and some photocopying. [19] Turning to the costs in the Employment Court, the substantive hearing took one day plus additional submissions. I am prepared to allow 80 percent of the total fees incurred of $6,780 (excluding GST) in the sum of $5,424. I have excluded GST in accordance with the usual principles. 6 As to disbursements I allow the binding of the bundle of documents at $59.12, photocopying at $40, travelling exp...

  6. De Marco v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on Appeal) [2025] NZACC 27 (17 February 2025) [pdf, 230 KB]

    ...hold the insane sociopathic behaviour of ACC staff to account is to punish them financially. 1.4 million times the 2 years of life Young impacted upon I WILL BE CLAIMING FOR 2.8 MILLION DOLLARS IN DISPERSEMENTS. [3] Ms Botha for the Corporation filed a memorandum dated 20 December 2024 outlining the principles pertaining to the award of disbursements and seeking a direction from the Court that Ms de Marco file a fresh application for disbursements in accordance with the District C...

  7. FG v TT [2018] NZDT 1060 (9 March 2018) [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...rootstocks. In July 2017 FG clarified the exact number of rejections was 2200 and invoiced for that amount at the rate charged to them of 45 cents per rootstock plus GST, being a total of $1138.50. FG claims the invoiced amount of $1138.50, legal fees of $240.00 and interest at 5% from July 2017. Ms TT and Mr TT dispute the invoice, saying the rootstocks were not rejected within a reasonable time. The relevant law is the Sale of Goods provisions in the Contract and Commerc...

  8. Witehira - Awarua A25 (2008) 128 Whangarei MB 282 (128 WH 282) [pdf, 3.5 MB]

    ...COllrt by 30 November 2007 the finallcial Statements and Audit rep0l1s for the years ending 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2007. Once Ihalfurther material isfiled the COllrt will consider appointing a forensic accountant to report to the CalirI 011 expenses alld fees paid to the tmslees and will issue further directions regarding the review of the Tmst Orde/: 128 Whangarei MB 284 (3) Pursuant to section 37(3) the application is fur/her amended to inclilde all application to remove Pele Fa &#...

  9. [2012] NZEmpC 178 Rimene v P J Doherty & Natusch Group Ltd [pdf, 56 KB]

    ...present case is because the 28-day limitation period expired 2 May 2012 but his statement of 1 [2012] NZEmpC 177. 2 [2012] NZERA Wellington 32. claim was not filed until 4 May 2012 and the filing fee was not received by the Registry until 9 May 2012. Leave is, therefore, required to commence the challenge out of time. [3] In my judgment in WRC 14/12, I summarised the facts of the case and the Authority’s conclusions. The...

  10. Form 25B Fixed Fees G [pdf, 299 KB]

    Templates V15 – July 2018 page 1 07/18 form 25b Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedule G Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type ✓ High Court Court location Details of claim Date activity/fixed fee...