Search Results

1. TI v UB [2025] NZDT 47 (31 March 2025) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...offer. 6. Accordingly, I find that TI is entitled to a refund of the additional price she paid to have her son attend, and that amount is therefore added to the total of this order. 7. TI also claimed to be refunded the Disputes Tribunal filing fee. Section 43 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 provides that costs shall not be awarded by the Tribunal unless exceptional circumstances apply which do not apply on the facts of this case. No award is therefore made to reimburse TI fo...

2. LCRO 101/2017 RF v QC [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...destroyed in October 2016 without compensation being paid to Mr RF. [7] Mr RF wants his pistol endorsement back, to be reinstated to the [Area] Pistol Club and to get his pistols back. [8] Mr QC provided legal services to Mr RF, but stopped short of filing proceedings against the [Area] Pistol Club, addressing the test requirement with the [Area] Pistol Club and attempting to avert police destroying Mr RF’s pistols until Mr RF gave him $3,000 as security for his fees. [9] Mr...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 141 A Labour Inspector v Dao [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...is not opposed by the respondents. There were compliance issues with previous orders but counsel have advised that these have been resolved. The only outstanding matter between the parties is the issue of the release of further funds for legal fees. [4] To date, the sum of $65,000 has been released for the payment of legal fees. The respondents now ask for a further $11,994.56 to be paid into their solicitor’s trust account. Counsel has undertaken that such funds will be appl...

4. AO v ZH LCRO 301/2011 (12 March 2014) [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...$60,386.14 on account of the bills of costs which left a balance outstanding of $37,121.80. ZH issued proceedings for the recovery of this amount in May 2010. [6] In her complaint lodged on 4 August 2011, AO complained that she considered “the fees for the work undertaken to be excessive and inaccurate”. All of the detail relating to the complaint provided by her concerned alleged inaccuracy in ZH’s statements. [7] In his covering letter to the Complaints Service, FF advis...

5. [2020] NZEmpC 34 Byrne v The New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...respect of the Calderbank offer. Given the successful challenge to the Authority’s determination, Mrs Byrne should be awarded costs with regard to the Authority’s investigation at the tariff rate of $4,500, as well as reimbursement of a filing fee. e) Costs with regard to the hearing of the challenge was sought on a 2B basis, amounting to $28,919, and disbursements being fees payable to the Ministry of Justice. [7] Mr Cain, counsel for NZTA, submitted in summary:...

6. [2021] NZIACDT - 12 EM v Yong (3 June 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...clients. He had made immediate changes to his practice, as listed in Mr Logan’s letter. He intended completing the refresher course available at Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology. This involved approximately 100 learning hours. Complaint filed in Tribunal [33] The Registrar filed a complaint (dated 8 September 2020) in the Tribunal, with supporting documents. It alleges Mr Yong was negligent, a ground of complaint under the Act, or alternatively breached cls 1, 2(a), 2(e) and...

7. Form 10 Family legal aid [pdf, 467 KB]

   ...Provider Listed Provider B Provider name or number 1 2 3 A B 1 2 3 SUP A B Level of experience Provider rate (excl. GST) $ $ Step No. Date Activities Hours Total Fee Hours Total Fee Other (specify) Claim by type of proceeding (excl. GST) (If this claim relates to multiple proceedings, you must state portion of the claim that...

8. How to file and serve documents

   There are various documents you will need to provide to the Family Court. Find out more about how to submit your documents to the court electronically or in-person and how to provide copies of your documents to the other people involved.

   Located in:

   1. Family >
   2. Family Court >
   3. About the Family Court

9. [2011] NZEmpC 101 Arkompat v Thai Chilli Co Ltd t/a Thai Chilli [pdf, 95 KB]

   PRASERT ARKOMPAT V THAI CHILLI CO LTD TRADING AS THAI CHILLI NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 101 [10 August 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 101 ARC 33/11 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time for filing a challenge BETWEEN PRASERT ARKOMPAT Applicant AND THAI CHILLI CO LTD TRADING AS THAI CHILLI Respondent Hearing: 22 July 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Hon Matt Robson, counsel for applicant Paul Gallagher, coun...

10. [2021] NZIACDT 17 - TI v Malcolm (20 July 2021) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...complainant and Mr Malcolm entered into terms of engagement on about 7 August 2020 and shortly afterwards he completed the appropriate visa application form. [8] On 11 August 2020, Mr Malcolm advised the complainant that the application would be filed “tomorrow” and on 24 August 2020, he informed her that he had not heard from Immigration New Zealand. [9] Mr Malcolm did not file the application with Immigration New Zealand until 1 October 2020. [10] Immigration New Zea...