7482 items matching your search terms
Consultation Paper New fees framework for civil (ACC) legal aid providers Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or
Consultation Paper New fees framework for civil (ACC) legal aid providers Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or
...lead provider Provider number Name of law firm Firm number Details of claim Covers period from: to: Date of final disposition (if final invoice) Interim invoice Final invoice Please record the number of fixed fees for repeatable fee activities, activities based on anticipated hearing time, and hearing time activities. Number of fixed fees Fixed fee (excl. GST) Total fixed fees (excl. GST) Pre-proceeding Matters Early termination o...
...ON THE PAPERS DECISION The Application [1] The applicant has applied under s 122J of the Copyright Act 1994 (the 1994 Act) for an award under s 122O of that Act. Sections 122A-122U of the 1994 Act were added by the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act 2011 (the 2011 Act). These sections establish a “special regime for taking enforcement action against people who infringe copyright through file sharing” (s 122B(1)). The applicant seeks an award against the res...
...Linton says that Mr Keswick ―talked her out of it‖. Mr Keswick states that he advised Ms Linton that any grant of legal aid would have to be paid back and in light of this Ms Linton elected to make other arrangements regarding payment of his fees. [3] A hearing in respect of this matter was conducted on 17 August 2009 at which both Ms Linton and Mr Keswick were present. [4] Ms Linton originally complained to the Law Society by a letter dated November 10 2008. The central as...
...start date was 17 March 2021 and the appellant had until 17 March 2022 to enter New Zealand. Variation of fee [16] On 29 March 2021, the adviser sent a text to the appellant proposing to vary the November 2019 agreement. He would increase the fees by $6,500 on receipt of the second tax residence confirmation, if the appellant was not in New Zealand at the time the second tax application was made. Together with the original third payment of $2,660 and also $500, the adviser wou...
...make an order under s.122O. What Sum should be paid to the Applicant? [34] Under s.122O of the Act, if the Tribunal orders payment of a sum under s.122O(1), the sum specified is to be determined in accordance with the Copyright (Infringing Filing Sharing) Regulations 2011 (“the Regulations”). Any sum awarded must include a sum in relation to every infringement identified in the enforcement notice that the Tribunal is satisfied was committed against the rights owner at an IP a...
...document. He refused, but drafted a new contact and charged $720 for doing so. [6] The adviser says he provided advice to allow the complainant to research whether it was correct that he had a good prospect of selection, and charged fair and reasonable fees, using the appropriate process. [7] The Tribunal has to determine whether the adviser gave adequate advice, and whether he could justify the fees and the process for setting them. The Statement of Complaint [8] The Registrar file...
On this page: What happens after you have initiated a challenge Will the Employment Relations Authority's determination be stayed? Application for leave to extend the time for filing a challenge Challenges in respect of dismissal of frivolous or vexatious proceedings File a challenge in the Employment Court if you are dissatisfied with a written determination issued by the Employment Relations Authority.1 This is also called challenging a determination. You will be called the plaintiff an...
...New Zealand and a previous client of Ms Ma’s. This person is understood to be Mr L. It was Ms Y who was in contact with Mr L. [6] There followed texts and voice discussions between Ms Ma and Ms Y. The communications concerned the agreed fee (RMB 80,000 for each of the father and son), the documents needed and the requirement for a medical check. At some point, Ms Ma sent her template questionnaire (‘Online application information details’) to them seeking 3 biogra...