KR v WH LCRO 141 / 2010 (14 May 2012) [pdf, 128 KB]
...from ADR advising that they had been instructed by KR’s former partner, that the terms of the letter of 24 September 2008 were largely agreed, and requested a draft agreement. 2 [5] The detail of the attendances which took place on the file is recorded in the section of this decision headed “The delay”. However, the facts giving rise to one aspect of this complaint are that ADR sent three further faxes seeking a response from WH and the draft agreement to which she did...