Search Results

Search results for filing fees.

7493 items matching your search terms

  1. [2022] NZEmpC 88 ABC v DEF [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...Appeal did not consider that there was a seriously arguable question of law, that was a finding made for the purposes of an appeal to that Court and was not therefore a relevant consideration. [17] ABC also pointed out that she had received a “fee waiver at the Court of Appeal on the grounds of public interest”. [18] She also said the Court of Appeal had considered there should be no award of costs on either application; however, as mentioned earlier, DEF had not sought costs,...

  2. [2025] NZIACDT 49 - CE v Asici (22 September 2025) [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...complaint is accepted. Ms Asici has learned from the mistake. It is acknowledged their practices had fallen short of the standard. Oral explanations of the agreement are now given. They agree that a client should sign off an application prior to filing. They continue to look for ways to improve their processes. They hold regular CPD sessions on rulings of the Tribunal, best practice and the Authority’s requirements. Ms Asici also regularly attends webinars of the Authori...

  3. Kemp - Pouto Topu A (2012) 51 Taitokerau MB 277 (51 TTK 277) [pdf, 146 KB]

    ...affidavit are to be served by the Trustees on those whose buildings may be located on the Trust’s property without their authority. After the application has been filed it is to be set down for a 2 hour fixture in Whangarei. The application fee is waived. The present applications [15] The application under s 18(1)(a) was filed on 24 January 2011. By direction of 15 April 2011 4 Judge Spencer noted that in terms of his direction of 13 October 2010, it would seem that the s...

  4. Hartlepool v Basildon LCRO 79 / 2009 (3 September 2009) [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...Hartlepool was serious in her allegations of negligence it was proper for her to look for alternative counsel. However its general tenor is consistent with Mr Basildon acting in the matter once he received instructions on the basis of his agreed fees. [18] On 14 November the appeal had still not been filed. It appears that Mr Basildon (perhaps quite reasonably) had misgivings as to its merits. In a letter of that date (which followed a telephone call of the previous day) he confirm...

  5. 2017 Ministry of Justice Annual Report [pdf, 3.7 MB]

    E.64 (2017) Annual Report 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 https://justice.govt.nz 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2016–17 ANNUAL REPORT 2016–17 3 A nn ua l R ep or t 20 16 –1 7 Making it easier for people to use justice services so everyone can get on with enjoying life CONTENTS E.64 (2017) 2 OUR STORY Introduction from the Chief Executive 4 Achieving a safe and just New Zealand 6 Our vision 6 Our strategy 7 Our services 8 Achieving shared goals 9 Delivering policy priorities 9 Le

  6. Directory of Official Information Search Tool

    Accident Compensation Corporation Te Kaporeihana Āwhina Hunga Whara acc statutory crown entity Helps people injured in an accident, works to prevent injuries, helps businesses manage employee injuries, while encouraging safer workplaces and helps health providers lodge and manage claims. the minister for acc appoints a board of non-executive members to govern acc board members serve terms of up to three years with the option of reappointment the minister's formal line of accountability wi

  7. Regulatory Impact Statement Trans Tasman Proceedings Bill [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...Under the Brussels model, a court‟s jurisdiction is determined primarily by the defendant‟s domicile or by specific rules regarding particular types of claim. Where more than one court has jurisdiction, priority is decided by a „first to file‟ rule. Judgments are readily enforceable, with only limited exceptions. This option is not preferred. It was originally designed for EU Member States when all were civil law countries. Its civil law origins do not make it the best mod...

  8. LCRO 46/2017 DL v SC (18 May 2017) [pdf, 138 KB]

    ...still involved in Ms UV at some level. Once Mr MP was suspended he could no longer act for a client or have an instructing solicitor. Mr DL could have insisted on Mr MP providing a comprehensive briefing note, as a condition of taking over the file. If the handover of Ms UV’s matter had been properly managed, Mr MP should have been relieved of any and all further involvement. [24] There is clear evidence that Mr DL was engaged in correspondence with Mr MP in the lead up to th...

  9. Tane-Stockler - Hauturu East 8 (2002) 120 Otorohanga MB 3 (120 OT 3) [pdf, 2.1 MB]

    ...that there can be no succession. COpy TO: Ol20A.thc\3·12 Otorohanga Minute Book Volume 120 Folio 12 Page 10 The applicants have made their application in reliance on the Court's title. In the circumstances it is appropriate that their fees be refunded and I direct accordingly. Dated at Hamilton this 10th day of May 2002 .. ~~ ............. , .... " JUDGE G D CARTER The Applicants and to ali interested parties Recorded on the Court files....

  10. [2020] NZIACDT 29 - Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v Penty (6 July 2020) [pdf, 119 KB]

    ...the adviser’s unlawful delegation of control of the visa application and management of the client relationship to the staff of IPS/BNAC. [8] Mr Cleland had been disciplined in respect of 12 Filipino clients, with the applications having been filed with Immigration New Zealand in September and October 2016. The complaint against Ms Penty concerned 11 Filipino clients for whom she had acted between about March 2017 and August 2018. [9] The standard arrangement saw IPS/BNAC source...