Search Results

1. NU v ZY LCRO 239/2012 (31 March 2016) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...for levelling of accusation that venal interests were dominating the decisions. [23] It is against the backdrop of that troubled context, that this review falls for consideration. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [24] Mr NU filed his complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service on 19 December 2011. The complaints filed were comprehensive. Mr NU submits that: (a) Mr ZY had failed to take steps to ascertain whether Mrs EL had capacity...

2. Baker - Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Trust (2011) 19 Taitokerau MB 116 (19 TTK 116) [pdf, 9 MB]

   BAKER MLC 19 Taitokerau MB 116 21 April 2011 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 19 Taitokerau MB 116 (19 TTK 116) A20100004537 A20090015424 UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Trust BETWEEN MARYANNE BAKER Applicant Hearing: 26 May 2010 (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 21 April 2011 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER Introduction [1] The Te Tii (Waitangi)

3. Burrows & Anor v CAC20002 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 17 [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...property or any part of it is sold to anyone introduced during the period hereof, I agree to pay you (or if the property is sold or the or the introduction is made by any franchisee of Harcourts Group Ltd other than you, then to that franchisee) the fees set out below whether such sale is on the terms set out herein or any other terms acceptable to me if any exchange of the property or part of it is made by you or me or any other person during the period hereof or if such exchange is made...

4. ENV-2016-AKL-000198 G M Welsford Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz). within 20 working days after the Council notifies its decisions in relation to the recommendations of the Hearings Panel under section 148(4)(a) of the LGATPA (i.e. by no later than 16 September 2016). You must pay the filing fee required by regulation 15 of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure for Auckland Combined Plan) Regulations 2013 at the time you lodge this notice with the Environment Court. If your appeal concerns a r...

5. LCRO 65/2019 PT v [Area] Standards Committee [X] [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...determination of unsatisfactory conduct. Background [4] Ms ZM was sole principal of DB (the firm) until Ms PT joined her and they formed a business partnership (the partnership). The partnership endured for several years. [5] Ms PT had a physical file in her office that related to a complaint made to the NZLS around 2014 regarding conduct on the part of Ms ZM (the complaint). The complaint included an allegation that Ms ZM had breached her fiduciary duty to a client of th...

6. Family Court Rewrite Submission - Resolution Institute [pdf, 685 KB]

   ...Co-ordinator tasked with providing information and facilitating access to out of court services One party not wanting to participate  Not wanting to change current arrangements or experience further conflict  Cost of FDR  Remove FDR fees so cost isn’t a disincentive  Sanctions for a party who refuses to participate in FDR without reason, if the case goes to court The message of self-resolution if possible, albeit with assistance, needs to be clear and reinf...

7. Mokaraka - Waima C8 (2019) Chief Judge's MB 1137 (2019 CJ 1137) [pdf, 419 KB]

   ...dated 13 August 2019 set out the background to the application. The reports are reproduced in full as follows:- APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 45 OF TE TURE WHENUA MĀORI ACT 1993 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Introduction 1. This application, filed by Miha Maihi Mokaraka and six others (the applicants), seeks to amend succession orders and an order determining ownership of a dwelling made at 2 Kaikohe (Succession) MB 32 in respect of Pani Mokaraka, deceased and the ownership of a h...

8. Gough-Pataua 4B (2011) 19 Taitokerau MB 1 (19 TTK 1) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...into Pataua 4A, 4B and 4C. 5 Pataua 4C was alienated to the Crown and now forms a public reserve administered by the Department of Conservation. Pataua 4A and 4B remain in Māori ownership. Progress of applications [12] The applications were filed in 2006 and were set down for hearing without first being referred to a Judge for directions. They came before Judge Ambler on 29 August 2006 when he adjourned the application to Chambers to issue directions. 6 On 22 December 2006

9. Manuel v Waitakere City Council [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...Lockhart QC INTRODUCTION [1] The adjudication hearing of this claim commenced on 3 December 2007. It was estimated to last five days. The evidence finally concluded on 17 December 2007 after 8 actual hearing days. Counsel were to file written final submissions - some by 23 January 2008 and the others by 1 February 2008. The hearing was adjourned to recommence on 13 and 14 February 2008 to allow all counsel to make oral submissions. The filings of written submissio...

10. Sargent - Ngatekawa Block (2008) 126 Whangarei MB 134 (126 WH 134) [pdf, 658 KB]

    ...resolutions to the establish an aim whenua trust, to appoint trustees and to determine any special terms of the trust. [4] The application was ne},,'t heard by me on 9 October 2007. The agents had convened a meeting of owners however they had not filed anything confirming adveltising of the meeting or copies of the minutes or consents of the trustees. The application was adj oUl1led for that the take place. [5] The application was next heard on 23 November 2007. Minutes of th...